Use of evidence in WHO recommendations (Q34627124)

3 August 2017

Use of evidence in WHO recommendations. (English)

1 reference

World Health Organization

3 August 2017

0 references

1

Andrew D Oxman

1 reference

3 August 2017

3

Atle Fretheim

1 reference

3 August 2017

John N Lavis

2

1 reference

PubMed ID

17493676

3 August 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 June 2007

1 reference

3 August 2017

1 reference

3 August 2017

369

1 reference

3 August 2017

9576

1 reference

3 August 2017

1883-1889

1 reference

Effect of panel composition on physician ratings of appropriateness of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: elucidating differences between multispecialty panel results and specialty society recommendations

3 August 2017

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography--do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Appropriateness of surgery for sciatica: reliability of guidelines from expert panels

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Effect of specialty and nationality on panel judgments of the appropriateness of coronary revascularization: a pilot study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

The science of reviewing research

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Rationale for systematic reviews

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Use of research to inform public policymaking

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

More informative abstracts of articles describing clinical practice guidelines.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960675-8

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60675-8

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

3 August 2017

1 reference

PubMed ID

17493676