The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process? (Q33336841)

25 July 2017

The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process? (English)

1 reference

25 July 2017

0 references

1 reference

James M Brophy

5

0 references

Louise Pilote

Louise Pilote

11

0 references

Robert W. Platt

Robert W Platt

3

0 references

Ritsuko Kakuma

Ritsuko Kakuma

9

0 references

Ian Shrier

1

Ian Shrier

1 reference

25 July 2017

Jean-François Boivin

2

1 reference

25 July 2017

Russell J Steele

4

1 reference

25 July 2017

Franco Carnevale

6

1 reference

25 July 2017

Mark J Eisenberg

7

1 reference

25 July 2017

Andrea Furlan

8

1 reference

25 July 2017

Mary Ellen Macdonald

10

1 reference

25 July 2017

Michel Rossignol

12

1 reference

25 July 2017

21 May 2008

1 reference

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

25 July 2017

1 reference

25 July 2017

8

1 reference

25 July 2017

19

1 reference

Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

25 July 2017

start time

21 May 2008

1 reference

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

copyright status

copyrighted

1 reference

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

exact match

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1472-6947-8-19

0 references

cites work

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

Revisiting the Cochrane Collaboration. Meeting the challenge of Archie Cochrane--and facing up to some new ones

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

Medical and nursing clinical decision making: a comparative epistemological analysis.

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2F1472-6947-8-19

Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2F1472-6947-8-19

Systematic Reviews in Health Care

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2F1472-6947-8-19

Where now for meta-analysis?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2F1472-6947-8-19

Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186%2F1472-6947-8-19

A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2408567

Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. II: Replicate variability and comparison of studies that agree and disagree

31 October 2018

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18495019

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collabor

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18495019

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

The application of decision making concepts by nurse practitioners in general practice

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18495019

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1186/1472-6947-8-19

1 reference

journals/midm/ShrierBPSBCEFKMPR08

25 July 2017

1 reference

DBLP Dataset 2021-01-02

Dimensions Publication ID

28 January 2021

0 references

1 reference

25 July 2017

1 reference