Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs: a review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews (Q24614045)

From Wikidata

Jump to navigation Jump to search

scientific article

Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional chinese medicine RCTs: A review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews

Language	Label	Description	Also known as
English	Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs: a review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews	scientific article	Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional chinese medicine RCTs: A review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews

Statements

scholarly article

0 references

5 references

25 June 2019

8 September 2019

19 September 2019

2 October 2020

3 July 2021

systematic review

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs: a review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews (English)

0 references

traditional Chinese medicine

1 reference

8 September 2019

biomedical investigative technique

1 reference

19 September 2019

evidence-based medicine

1 reference

2 October 2020

patient selection

1 reference

3 July 2021

systematic review

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

author name string

Jia He

1

0 references

Liang Du

2

0 references

Guanjian Liu

3

0 references

Jin Fu

4

0 references

Xiangyu He

5

0 references

Jiayun Yu

6

0 references

Lili Shang

7

0 references

language of work or name

0 references

publication date

13 May 2011

5 references

25 June 2019

8 September 2019

19 September 2019

2 October 2020

3 July 2021

0 references

12

0 references

1

0 references

122

0 references

copyright license

Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

5 references

Europe PubMed Central

25 June 2019

Europe PubMed Central

8 September 2019

Europe PubMed Central

19 September 2019

Europe PubMed Central

2 October 2020

Europe PubMed Central

3 July 2021

copyright status

0 references

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1745-6215-12-122

1 reference

9 September 2019

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1745-6215-12-122

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

7 April 2017

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

7 April 2017

Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

7 April 2017

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

7 April 2017

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

7 April 2017

The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

7 April 2017

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

7 April 2017

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

7 April 2017

Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'.

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine: a survey of 13 randomly selected journals from mainland China

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Improving the quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine, part I: clinical trial design and methodology

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Bias in clinical intervention research.

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

27 September 2017

Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

30 May 2018

Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3114769

30 May 2018

[Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals]

1 reference

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21569452

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

Identifiers

10.1186/1745-6215-12-122

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

Dimensions Publication ID

1 reference

9 September 2019

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1745-6215-12-122

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

ResearchGate publication ID

0 references

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q24614045&oldid=1636891174"