Lexeme talk:L7015

homosexual sense(s)

I feel like the current second sense, (usually of men) homosexual, could be split up into two, one for “homosexual” (in general) and one for “male homosexual” (specifically). Does anyone agree/disagree? (Pinging ArthurPSmith and Jc86035, who edited this lexeme.) —Galaktos (talk) 21:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

@Galaktos: I'm not sure. It would be useful if there were a guideline for this sort of thing. Jc86035 (talk) 09:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

I've been trying to match sense scope closely to Wikidata items; the current sense fits the linked item pretty closely. If there's justification for splitting the linked item then perhaps two senses also would be warranted (or vice versa). ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)