Wikidata:Property proposal/type of deterioration

deterioration

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

   Done: deterioration (P12680) (Talk and documentation)

Description	to indicate types of deterioration presented by an artwork, building, artifact, etc.
Represents	deterioration (Q3045438)
Data type	Item
Domain	work of art (Q838948)
Allowed values	abrasion (Q331424) stripe (Q3421342) fold (Q52560700) tear (Q125416942) Q125416963 Q125416981 craquelure (Q1329067) Q125417008 Q125417030 active mushrooms (Q125417043) Q125417048 Q125417054 silver mirroring (Q112581162) sulfidation (Q17083717) Q125417099 Q125417103 Q125417121 Q125417125 leaching (Q1483184) stain (Q97119922) Q125417683 Q125417692 Q125417710 Q125417716 image processing (Q327008) Q125417770 Q125417781 Q125417806 Q125417819 foxing (Q1454672) Q125417857
Example 1	Q52200306→silver mirroring (Q112581162)
Example 2	Q52200306→tear (Q125416942)
Example 3	Q52200306→Q125417819
Source	https://cdf.montevideo.gub.uy/system/files/documentos/guia_2023_-_para_web.pdf
Planned use	Wikimedistas de Uruguay has been working with Montevideo Center of Photography (CdF) to upload to Commons their collection of scanned old photographs. The CdF has provided metadata about the pictures, including the type of damage each photograph has suffered. We are requesting this property to use it as Structured Data on Commons.
See also	state of conservation (P5816)

Motivation

We believe that this property is particularly relevant for Structured Data on Commons. Our planned use is to describe scanned photographs. It can also be used to describe other works of art. This has been discussed in the GLAM-Wiki global telegram group.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Piracalamina (talk • contribs) at 20:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC).

Discussion

• Creating this property after discussion on Wikidata:Property proposal/image decay
•  Support Also I think this is aligned with the P44 has condition property of CIDOC CRM (Q624005). —Ismael Olea (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
• Is there a reason to prefer calling this "type of deterioration" instead of just calling it "deterioration"? Intuitively, I would prefer the shorter label but I'm unsure whether anyone sees problems with it. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 21:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

  I'm fine with it being named just "deterioration". I proposed "type of..." only because it's the literal translation of the field label used by the CdF's catalogue: https://cdf.montevideo.gub.uy/catalogo/foto/09904fmhge ("Tipo de deterioro"). Piracalamina (talk) 13:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

• This needs to be kept distinct from state of conservation (P5816) for buildings, so weathered, burnt out etc, but not ruined, demolished. Vicarage (talk) 15:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

  good point! That said, I support the proposal; it sounds like a good idea Jerimee (talk) 01:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

• @Piracalamina, Olea, Jerimee, Vicarage, ChristianKl:  Done as deterioration (P12680). Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)