User talk:Piracalamina

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

¿Liceo/UTU duplicado?[edit]

Hola. ¿Puede ser que haya uno duplicado en los datos de origen que importaste? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q119826994 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q119827390 Muralituy (talk) 02:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! Lo decís porque tienen una ubicación muy parecida? Los números de puerta son distintos, uno está en Gral. Batlle Y Gil 1065 y otro en General Batlle Y Gil 3247. Supongo que deben ser dos establecimientos diferentes. O tenés otra información? Los datos son del catálogo de ANEP, no he andado por el barrio :) Piracalamina (talk) 13:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias. Esto ya logre entenderlo, en el catalogo no estan bien las ubicaciones. Al igual que otros tantos de ese catalogo que he ido corrigiendo... Muralituy (talk) 00:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment[edit]

Dear Piracalamina,

I hope you are doing well,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I am working on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender model that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our model based on your previous edits.

Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published in a research venue.

The experiment should take no more than 15 minutes, and it will be held next week.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfA1wfdBfCRlcG3WhDyc-V8lzgPNx3fDFCNXkyn4CSwahXZ_A/viewform?usp=sf_link

Then, I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about my project, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa

In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leveling Up Days: your feedback is needed![edit]

Thanks for joining the Wikidata Leveling Up Days!

Hello there,

You receive this message because you added yourself on the participants list of the Wikidata Leveling Up Days. I hope you had a chance to attend the event!

If you didn't have a chance to attend, no worries: all the video materials are available in this Wikimedia Commons category. It includes captions in English and you can also contribute to adding translations in other languages.

If you attended at least one session or watched a video, we would love to have your feedback on the event! We kindly ask you to fill in this participants survey. It is anonymous and will take you 5-10min to answer.

We hope to see you around on Wikidata in the future. If you want to stay in touch with the community, feel free to join or subscribe to our communication channels!

Best, Lea Lacroix (WMDE)

Re: subclasses of image decay (Q125416855)[edit]

Per Help:Basic membership properties#subclass of (P279): X is a subclass of Y only if all instances of X are also instances of Y. Classes like fold (Q52560700), stain (Q97119922), and leaching (Q1483184) are not limited to occurrences in photographs, so it is not appropriate to make them subclasses of image decay (Q125416855), and in fact, because P279 is transitive, this leads to false inferences like skin fold (Q7535393)subclass of (P279)image decay (Q125416855). I have left alone the items you created specifically for types of image decay, but I note that some of them (like foxing (Q1454672)) seem to apply to types of documents other than photos, so those descriptions may need adjusting to make their P279 statements valid. Swpb (talk) 18:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are totally right. after the discussion on the property proposal I don't know if I even need Q125416855. I'll finish cleaning things up. thanks a lot. Piracalamina (talk) 18:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, happy to help! Swpb (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion entre liceos? Ansina y Cardozo[edit]

Hola. Si podes revisa estos dos items, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q119827123 y https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q113708558 Hay alguna confusion, o en los numeros/nombres o en la imagen, o algo raro.

  • Las fotos del 2do item son del primero.
  • El 2do item creo que es la escuela 10 de cardozo, y no el liceo 10 Mauricio Lopez Lomba.
  • No parecen ser el mismo porque tienen distinto codigo RUEE.
  • O las coordenadas y direccion del segundo estan mal.

No se si el error viene originado del catalogo de ANEP o que... pero algo mal hay.

Creo que la solucion seria mover las fotos al 1er item. Cambiar el segundo item, nombre y propiedades para que sea escuela primaria. Muralituy (talk) 00:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Piracalamina&oldid=2145028417"