Shortcut: WD:PP/ORGWikidata:Property proposal/Organization
| Property proposal: | Generic | Authority control | Person | Organization |
| Creative work | Place | Sports | Sister projects | |
| Transportation | Natural science | Computing | Lexeme |
See also[edit]
- Wikidata:Property proposal/Pending – properties which have been approved but which are on hold waiting for the appropriate datatype to be made available
- Wikidata:Properties for deletion – proposals for the deletion of properties
- Wikidata:External identifiers – statements to add when creating properties for external IDs
- Wikidata:Lexicographical data – information and discussion about lexicographic data on Wikidata
This page is for the proposal of new properties.
Before proposing a property
- Search if the property already exists.
- Search if the property has already been proposed.
- Check if you can give a similar label and definition as an existing Wikipedia infobox parameter, or if it can be matched to an infobox, to or from which data can be transferred automatically.
- Select the right datatype for the property.
- Read Wikidata:Creating a property proposal for guidelines you should follow when proposing new property.
- Start writing the documentation based on the preload form below by editing the two templates at the top of the page to add proposal details.
Creating the property
- Once consensus is reached, change status=ready on the template, to attract the attention of a property creator.
- Creation can be done 1 week after the creation of the proposal, by a property creator or an administrator.
- See property creation policy.
 |
On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2024/05. |
Politics/public election[edit]
- Please review Wikidata:WikiProject every politician before proposing. Ping members of project using {{Ping project|every politician}}
--PoliceSheep99 (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --PoliceSheep99 (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.
WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Lewisiscrazy (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
hasFeldpostNumber[edit]
| Description | Property to link German military units to their respective Feldpost numbers, referencing the specific identifier used during the military communications in the world wars. Referencing German military unit (Q63074246) to Feldpost number (Q467921) |
|---|---|
| Represents | Feldpost number (Q467921) |
| Data type | String |
| Example 1 | 2nd Company 8th Replacement Marine Artillery Battalion hasFeldpostNumber"31447 A" |
| Example 2 | Q125555196 hasFeldpostNumber"00309" <-- in this case the URI ofthe Secret Military Police Group 724 |
| Example 3 | 2nd. Company Sturm-Pionier-Bataillon 178 hasFeldpostNumber"15605" |
| Planned use | To create a link between German military units and their Feldpost numbers for better data accessibility and research. |
| See also | German military unit (Q63074246), Feldpost number (Q467921) |
Motivation[edit]
I want to create a database of German military units from the two world wars for a database project. To make all my data FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) and especially to make it publicly accessible, I need this new property "hasFeldpostNumber" to provide essential information on research about the units. This property will utilize the existing Feldpost number (Q467921) to mark these units. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sveburk (talk • contribs) at 11:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Discussion[edit]
- @LimaMario:, could you please fulfil the minimum requirements, see
{{Property proposal}}for more info. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)- Dear ZI Jony, I tried my best to meet the requirements, could you tell me, what information is still needed? Sveburk (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- why have the 'has' at the start? Is there a general military unit number that could be used instead, rather than create new properties for each country? Vicarage (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- The has is to imply the difference between the resource „Feldpostnummer/Feldpostnumber“ and the new property. As the German Feldpostnumbers have their own resource it is clear to me, to link the units to the resource with the unique post-code numbers that were used within the units. The use of a general number therefore would not be suitable, especially not for my project as described in the proposal. Sveburk (talk) 18:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think you need to make this clear with concrete examples and get people who know about German military structures to comment, as I don't Vicarage (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Oppose as concerns not addressed. This sounds like a personal project that's going to be poorly integrated into WD. Vicarage (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think you need to make this clear with concrete examples and get people who know about German military structures to comment, as I don't Vicarage (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- The has is to imply the difference between the resource „Feldpostnummer/Feldpostnumber“ and the new property. As the German Feldpostnumbers have their own resource it is clear to me, to link the units to the resource with the unique post-code numbers that were used within the units. The use of a general number therefore would not be suitable, especially not for my project as described in the proposal. Sveburk (talk) 18:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Hotel[edit]
Organization[edit]
- See also Wikidata:Property proposal/Pending for approved items awaiting the deployment of currently unavailable datatypes
intervener[edit]
Motivation[edit]
Half of Supreme Court of Canada decisions are made with third-parties called interveners and it has even been said that you can tell how important a case by the number of interveners allowed to weigh in on a pending legal decision (https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4029&context=scholarly works) The role of interveners are of great interest to legal scholars, political scientists, and activists. At present, legal cases allow for a plaintiff and a respondent to be properties of a legal case, but not third party intervenes who are also allowed to present documents to the court. Interveners should be considered an 'input' to a legal decision and not an 'outcome' and as such, they don't belong as 'part of' a decision of the judges. Happy to clarify any of the above. Note: I've asked WikiProject Canadian law for comment. Copystar (talk) 21 April 2024 (UTC)