User talk:Opensofias/Archive 1
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikidata, Opensofias!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Best regards! --Tobias1984 (talk) 09:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikidata, Opensofias!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, please ask me on [[User talk:|my talk page]]. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Best regards! --Tobias1984 (talk) 09:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Property[edit]
has facet polytope (P1312) is done. Feel free to request more properties. Should we start a WikiProject Mathematics on Wikidata? Would be good to gather imported items and frequently used properties. It also helps new users find information about the items they would like to improve. -Tobias1984 (talk) 09:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
You might also like to join:
- Wikidata:WikiProject Physics
- Wikidata:WikiProject Informatics
- And crystallographic properties are found at Wikidata:WikiProject Chemistry and Wikidata:WikiProject Mineralogy. -Tobias1984 (talk) 09:53, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thanks, this is great. :)
i guess it makes a lot of sense to have a WikiProject for mathematics here. i'm not sure i can contribute much to this besides by random acts of knowlege and the occasional mistake. --opensofias (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- That sounds good. I'll create a basic page. It is mostly just an organizational help and a place to ask questions (as you might have noticed on the other pages). Tobias1984 (talk) 17:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- I took the liberty to add your name to the participant list: Wikidata:WikiProject Mathematics Tobias1984 (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
== dual to (P1322) ==
Habe gerade die Eigenschaft dual to (P1322) erstellt! Tobias1984 (talk) 11:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- yay :D --opensofias (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Arguable wikidata edit[edit]
Hello, Opensofias. I'm not sure that it's correct to say that lattice (Q595364) consists of (has part(s) (P527)) two semilattice (Q834585). It IS lower semilattice and upper semilattice but can contain multiple sublattices each of them is a lattice and thus a semilattice. I think it would be right to delete this statement (and did it) and find a more correct way to express the fact that lattice is a semilattice. VorontsovIE (talk) 12:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
oh, i see what you mean, i haven't thought about sublattices to be honest. i've done similar things in ring (Q161172), field (Q190109) and items like that.. i used "has part" because its upper and lower sublattices are "using" separate operations. it's different from how semilattices are both band (Q4177774) and commutative semigroup (Q27672715). there may be better ways to represent this, but i don't know any. i'm not a mathematician.. --opensofias (talk) 11:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
First of all, thank you for notification on my discussion page. I've created upper semilattice (Q29018101) and lower semilattice (Q29018102) (unfortunately they don't have wikipedia pages, because redirection pages can't be links for wikidata items) and made an hierarchy of subclass of (P279) statements. Now one can deduce that lattice (Q595364) is both upper semilattice (Q29018101) and lower semilattice (Q29018102) and each of the latter are semilattice (Q834585). Will try to do the same for other items. Thank you for links on them. upd: Unfortunately, it's really hard to represent properties of two operations for a ring and a field. VorontsovIE (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
hum, yeah, i wasn't so happy about this solution in the first place.
there isn't really an upper or lower semilattice without a lattice, right? and you can interchange them without the result being any less of a lattice. i still kind of like my "part of" thing. it's like a functional part not a mere subset. i wish i could put it in more precise terms.. i think we should bring fort this problem in Wikidata:WikiProject Mathematics. --opensofias (talk) 01:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand your objections yet. Both upper and lower semilattices are semilattices by definition. Lattice is a structure which is both upper and lower semilattice. And you can easily make an upper(lower) semilattice which isn't lattice. Three elements is enough for this (a > b; a > c; b not comparable to c; so any two elements have upper bound, but lower bound of b and c is undefined). Lattice doesn't contain semilattices, it is semilattice as a whole. Every element of a lattice is an element of both semilattices simultaneously. VorontsovIE (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Classes of chemical compound[edit]
Hey. I've noticed that you're adding a lot of classes to chemical compound items. Keep in mind that there is no agreement in Wikiproject Chemistry how we should classify chemical compounds in WD (what data model should be applied and whether chemical compounds are classes or not) and if this should be done using instance of/subclass of or dedicated property. More info here and on the discussion page. There is, however, an agreement that compounds without fully defined stereochemistry (like DL-phenylalanine (Q27103475)) shouldn't be instances of chemical compound but instances of group of isomeric entities (Q15711994) (or its subclass). Best, Wostr (talk) 01:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)