User talk:Nurni

Welcome to Wikidata, Nurni!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Merging items

Hallo Nurni,

If you were not already using it, you may want to check out the merge.js gadget for merging items. It has an option "Request deletion for extra items on RfD" to automatically nominate the page you are merging from for deletion. This way of nominating also makes it easier for the admins to process such requests. For support and other options you can check the help page about merging.

With regards, - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 14:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Christian hymn (Q856713)

Regarding you recent edit [1]. Do you have opinion on Talk:Q856713? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 20:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Artworks

The many clarifications on artworks that you have made are very usefull. Thank You --Shonagon (talk) 01:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

New paintings

Hi Nurni, thanks for creating new painting items like Three Saints: Barbara, Bartholomew and Dorothy (Q21509272). Could you do two things for me if you're going to create more items?

1. If the painter is anonymous please use anonymous (Q4233718)
2. Add the collection (P195) also as a qualifier of inventory number (P217)

Thank you! You might also like Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings. Multichill (talk) 16:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

National Museum in Warsaw (Q153306)

Wow, thank you for all this artworks. It's a great pleasure to discover them. --Shonagon (talk) 20:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. BTW, I would like to thank you for Crotos which's absolutely great artwork search engine and very useful tool. I use it every single day. Nurni (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Are these paintings?

Hi Nurni, check out this list. I'm quite sure most of the item in this last are paintings. Could you check and maybe add the instance of painting to the right items? That way these get on the radar. Multichill (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Q3680199

You have edited the item which connects two different people. The same pepople are described in Q3680198.Xx236 (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Jay Chou

Can you explain, why you reverted this? Thank you Teemeah (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Please, use specific person with child (P40). girl (Q3031) is a subclass of person (it represents every girl on the world). Maybe you should use number of children (P1971) instead. Nurni (talk) 13:29, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Teemeah (talk) 11:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Anna Báthory

Hi, why have you merged Q6423197 into Anna Báthory (Q853643) ? Those are two different people as you can see from their dates. Please revert your changes. --Melderick (talk) 01:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Antarctic Treaty Area

Hi Nurni,

I noticed you have been editing items in the field. You might want to participate in the discussion at Property_talk:P17#Proposal_for_solution_II. There is also another US favored approach.
--- Jura 00:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Linking to mythology

Hi, did you remove the link to mythology on Celtic mythology (Q1106575) because you believe I should've used "part of" instead of "subclass" or because you don't believe they should be linked? In the former case, I think I might agree and I'll change the links to say "part of". --Azertus (talk) 10:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Answ

Yes. I have the "argument" of queries still not working well with double queries (query for subclass of whatnot( wdt:P279/wdt:P279*) U situated within administrative unit (wdt:P131/wdt:P131*) of whatnot?) behind. What reason do you have for eliminating building (Q41176) and not church building (Q16970) when you have still Eastern Orthodox church building (Q2031836)?--Asqueladd (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Precision

Be careful Nurni, on several paintings like Saint Jerome as Scholar (Q19856861), Adoration of the Magi with Camels (Q18221011) & The Immaculate Conception (Q16615831) you set the wrong precision. Multichill (talk) 15:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Greek mythology

Thanks for your great work! If you want, you can join Wikidata:WikiProject Ancient Greece. Bye, --Epìdosis 20:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Removal of museum

Hi Nurni, I don't think you should be mass removing like you did here. This feels an awful lot like the category intersections making things unfindable on Wikimedia Commons. In this case your edit is plain correct. Rijksmuseum used to be a national museum, but hasn't been one for many years. The museum houses over a million artefacts so is much more than an art museum. I'm sure if I go to your auto edit list I can find many more of these mistakes. The de facto convention right now is that we stop the splitting up into smaller parts stops at the museum level, you broke that now. Can you please revert your edits and restore the instance of (P31) -> museum (Q33506). Multichill (talk) 10:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Could you please respond? Multichill (talk) 22:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Strange Merge

Hello Nurmi. Thanks for you many good merges that I'm currently checking (regularly, I check all new artworks merges ). For this one https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q11821763&diff=472148895&oldid=433086133 I have a big doubt. Is there something wrong somewhere ? Maybe The Christ Child (Q21532088) was a part of Annunciation with the Unicorn Polyptych (Q11821763) and in that case part of (P361) could maybe be used. Best regards --Shonagon (talk) 06:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Property:P136

Hello! Now this property is for a creative work's genre or the genre in which an artist works. I propose to separate Wikidata:Property proposal/genre in which an artist works, but there is no support. Why did you revert my edits [2]? --Oude-rusman (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

@Oude-rusman: P136 can be used with persons and artworks, it's ok. But art of painting (Q11629) is a method of creation of artworks, not a genre of art. You should use genre painting (Q214127), portrait painting (Q1400853), landscape art (Q191163) etc. with P136. Nurni (talk) 13:32, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

I saw

I saw and need to be careful. Thanks for fixing. Beko (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Removing references through petscan

Hi, please be aware that with such edits you remove sources (and probably also qualifiers) that were provided in the statements. It does not appear to matter much in this case, but it is definitely something to keep in mind. --Zolo (talk) 15:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Novella del giocatore di scacchi

Ciao Nurni, scusa se scrivo in italiano. La voce Novella del giocatore di scacchi mi ha creato un piccolo problema. Si tratta di un'opera unica, composta da due pannelli dipinti da Liberale da Verona e che furono poi staccati da un cassone. I due dipinti si trovano su commons in tre diverse versioni, di cui una in bianco e nero (brutta e da scartare). Separatamente, i due dipinti di una delle due versioni a colori erano già presenti si Wikidata; ma io avevo bisogno della terza versione, perché l'immagine comprendeva anche la cornice cinquecentesca, su cui volevo fare una nota. Quindi, ho scelto di fare una unica voce, su due pannelli, perché si tratta di una storia, raccontata in due quadri e che proviene dal frontale di un cassone. Non ho toccato quindi le voci esistenti, che non mi erano utili perché prendevano in esame separatamente i due pannelli dipinti e l'immagine era priva di cornice. Non so se sono stata chiara: le voci che già esistevano si riferiscono ad immagini diverse, dello stesso soggetto, fatte da un altro fotografo e di qualità inferiore. Se credi che debbano essere eliminate, fai pure. --FloraFlavia (talk) 14:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

(Q29538275) --FloraFlavia (talk) 15:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

@FloraFlavia: I don't speak Italian, so I'm not sure if I correctly understood your problem. We have 3 parts of 1 "cassone":

• A = , from MET [3] (inv. no. 1986.147)
• B = , from MET [4] (inv. no. 43.98.8)
• C = the part from The Berenson Collection

A and B are described in Chess player's novella (Q29538275). Right?

IMO, element Chess player's novella (Q29538275) should describe the whole "cassone" (A+B+C). Additionally, there should be 3 separate elements, each describing one part of "cassone" (A, B and C). Chess player's novella (Q29538275) needs to have a statement has part(s) (P527) with a value A, B and C, while every element corresponding to separate parts of "cassone" needs to have a statement part of (P361) with a value Chess player's novella (Q29538275). Hope this help.

La terza parte - C - (il cassone) è perduta e non si sa dove sia. Restano solamente la parte A e la parte B, cioè i due dipinti di Liberale da Verona. Sono nello stesso Museo e sono entrati separatamente, a distanza di anni l'uno dall'altro. Le cornici sono del '500, autentiche, e sono diverse tra loro. Non sono cornici tagliate per adattarle ai dipinti, ma sono cornici realizzate su misura. Probabilmente il cassone è stato smembrato pochi anni dopo la sua costruzione. Era un cassone matrimoniale. Forse di un matrimonio non riuscito?--FloraFlavia (talk) 14:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Guarda un cassone dell'Umbria, della stessa epoca https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bottega_umbra,_cassone_con_scene_di_apprendistato,_1500-10_ca._01.JPG --FloraFlavia (talk) 14:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Anche questo, fiorentino: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bottega_fiorentina,_cassone_con_storie_di_paride,_1400-50_ca._03.JPG --FloraFlavia (talk) 14:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Franc Zadravec

Hello! How come you reverted information about VIAF ID 22155136 for Franc Zadravec? --Romanm (talk) 20:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@Romanm: Because this viaf element is connected with Franc Zadravec (Q12789195) (literary historian) not Franc Zadravec (Q12789194) (agronomist).

Stop reverting

Widow of Zarephath (Q6605722) talks about a woman! not a Miracle!! We have Raising of the son of the widow of Zarephath (Q30075359) for the miricale--Mikey641 (talk) 08:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Mikey641: No, it doesn't! English wikipedia taks about biblical episode: "The raising of the widow of Zarephath's son is a miracle of the prophet Elijah recorded in the Hebrew Bible, 1 Kings 17.". If like, you can add new items about characters from the episode. Nurni (talk) 08:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes it does. Just because the english wikipedia linked to the wrong item doesn't make it right, in 4 languages: german, hebrew, greek and russian, the article talks about the woman/widow, just because the great english wikipedia decides not to talk about the woman but about the rising of her son, doesn't mean they can change the item to what they talk about, other wikipedias are not less important--Mikey641 (talk) 18:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Bust and sculture

Hi Nurni, you reverted my edit and i have a question. Where is relation between portrait at bust length (Q241045) and sculpture (Q860861)? I don't see it now. Skim (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Ok, i see bust (Q17489160), which is sculpture representation of bust. Both of this items has link to same Commons category, which is bad in this case. Skim (talk) 07:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Source for creator?

You added a creator to both Portrait of Prince Ladislaus Sigismund Vasa (Q29480634) and Q30008029. What did you base this on? Museum website says anonymous. Multichill (talk) 02:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

User:Magnus Manske/Mix'n'match report/27

FYI because we obviously both worked on these problems and it seems that this is the tool that can help fix them permanently. Best, --Marsupium (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Creator of Q30006630 and some other items

I see some of the paintings you edited popping up at Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Creator missing collection authority control. You added a creator to Portrait of Constance of Austria in coronation robes. (Q30006630), but what did you use as a source? The museum says something anonymous and the RKD has a rejected attribution for Pieter Soutman. Are you using some other source that is not linked? Multichill (talk) 18:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

@Multichill: Hi, I added a creator based on commons.

Clarification for gymnastics (Q13108218)

Hi. I was looking at gymnastics (Q13108218) and comparing it with gymnastics (Q43450) and in English, even with referral to the information contained in the first item, I did not find anything to understand the second item. Are you able to add some clarification to make it distinct? Thanks if you can.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Fred Cozzens birth place

Hi, Re: Frederick Schiller Cozzens I see you have him down as German birth, all the references I can find, including U.S.A. census reports say he was born in New York as was his father. I'm doing a DYK indirectly at the moment about him, Can you please sort this out? Thanks. Broichmore (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Q3305213

Nurni, Thanks for reverting some of my problematic edits with made from material (P186) painting (Q3305213). I cleaned up the rest (I hope). See

SELECT ?item ?itemLabel  WHERE {
  ?item wdt:P186 wd:Q3305213 .
  SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en". }
}
LIMIT 1000

Try it!

--Jarekt (talk) 03:25, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Master SH

Hi Nurni, which person did you have in mind with Master SH (Q41134591) ? AxelBoldt (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@AxelBoldt: I meant creator of Madonna and Child with a Monkey (Q41132872). Nurni (talk) 19:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I added the engraving to their page. AxelBoldt (talk) 11:21, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Soviet teams

Hmmm... why this revert? People tend to confuse between Russia and USSR... -- Blackcat (talk) 13:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

@Blackcat: I understand but you've edited different from (P1889) property page. Instead, you should add P1889 property to elements that you want to distinguish. Look at home (Q7743) and Domps (Q649681), for example. Nurni (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Oh yes you're right. Indeed I wanted to edit the item, maybe i was distracted. -- Blackcat (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

written work (Q47461344)

Hej, dlaczego written work (Q47461344) jest po polsku w liczbie mnogiej? Czy ta klasa ma dotyczyć wyłącznie jakichś zbiorów utworów? Ankry (talk) 09:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry: Słuszna uwaga, powinna być liczba pojedyncza. Poprawione Nurni (talk) 12:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Poland (Q36)

Skoro tak, to jakiego kraju królem był Bolesław I the Brave (Q53436)? Nieistniejącego w czasie jego królowania? Ankry (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Co więcej, ten artykuł nie dotyczy państwa powstałego w 1918, lecz dawniej. Czyżby był przypisany do niewłaściwego elementu? Ankry (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry: Odpowiedż na pierwsze pytanie to Duchy of Poland (Q11784930). Popatrz zresztą na hasło King of Poland (Q3273712) i obszar jurysdykcji. Poza tym nazwę oficjalną zapisaną w elemencie Poland (Q36), "Rzeczpospolita Polska", trudno odnosić do państwa pierwszych Piastów, które było monarchią i którzy traktowali posiadane przez siebie ziemie jako swoją i tylko swoją domenę. Przyznaję jednak, jest tu niekonsekwencja i brak spójności z hasłem na polskiej Wikipedii. Są też przecież osobne hasła Polish People's Republic (Q211274) i Second Polish Republic (Q207272) obejmujące okres po 1918. Podobna niekonsekwencja jest również w przypadku elementów Germany (Q183) (od 1949), Prussia (Q38872) (1525-1947), Weimar Republic (Q41304) (1919-1933) i Nazi Germany (Q7318) (1933-1945), German Confederation (Q151624) (1815-1866) itd. Prawdę mówiąc nie mam pomysłu jak to naprawić. Pewnie trzeba zdecydować się na jeden z wariantów:

• element Poland (Q36) jest sumą elementów Civitas Schinesghe (Q5124786), Duchy of Poland (Q11784930), United Kingdom of Poland (Q9391434), Crown of the Kingdom of Poland (Q171348), Second Polish Republic (Q207272) i Polish People's Republic (Q211274) z wszystkim tego konsekwencjami
• element Poland (Q36) opisuje okres po 1918 i pokrywa się Second Polish Republic (Q207272) i Polish People's Republic (Q211274)
• element Poland (Q36) opisuje tylko najnowszy okres po 1989

Może masz jakieś inne pomysły? Nurni (talk) 08:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Uważam, że powinny istnieć dwa osobne elementy: jeden (Polska) opisujący państwo na przestrzeni wieków, a drugi pewien okres w jego historii (Rzeczpospolita Polska). Artykuł w Wikipedii dotyczy wg mnie tego pierwszego. I nie wydaje mi się, by dało się w jednym elemencie zawrzeć wszystkie informacje: o terytorium, sąsiadach, granicach itp. w różnych okresach istnienia państwa. Natomiast ewidentnym błędem jest według mnie ustawianie daty powstania państwa bez "poprawienia" wszystkich odwołań do tego elementu, które dotyczą innych okresów historycznych. A sądzę, że będą ich tysiące. Wprowadza to duże zamieszanie (np. co należałoby podawać dla książek wydanych w XIX w. w Warszawie jako "kraj pochodzenia", gdzie istotne jest, czy ten "kraj pochodzenia" podpisał w 1920 Konwencję Berneńską? Rzeczpospolita będąca następcą prawnym Królestwa Kongresowego podpisała, a carska Rosja, której następcą prawnym nie jest obecna Rosja - nie podpisała).

Przykładem elementu, którego nie można przypisać do jednego okresu historycznego jest wspomniany wyżej King of Poland (Q3273712). Natomiast przykład Niemiec nie jest dobrym przykładem, na którym należałoby się wzorować. Oni mieli bardzo uwikłaną i wielowątkową państwowość. Lepszymi wzorcami będą Francja czy Węgry - mające ciągłość państwowości i istniejące zasadniczo jako pojedyncze państwa.

Wychodzi mi, że odwołań do Poland (Q36), które należałoby przy takiej zmianie zweryfikować jest ok. 540 tysięcy. Ja się nie podejmuję. Ankry (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Bust of Camilla Barbadoni

Bust of Camilla Barbadoni actually happens to be a bust, so why did you revert? --Hjart (talk) 11:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@Hjart: portrait at bust length (Q241045) is an art genre. Bust of Camilla Barbadoni is not an art genre, it's a sculpture. Nurni (talk) 11:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

I don't really understand the difference. To me this belongs to a very specific type of sculpture called "bust". We also have the very similar bust item.--Hjart (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

I think you misunderstand portrait at bust length (Q241045), which happens to be a subclass of (P279) of portrait (Q134307). Bust of Camilla Barbadoni is a specific case of portrait at bust length (Q241045)/bust (Q17489160). The system works the same way for buildings, roads, etc btw.--Hjart (talk) 12:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

visual artwork (Q4502142) as instance of (P31) of artificial physical object (Q8205328)

Hello Nurni, I've noticed

1. you have or are moving the class visual artwork (Q4502142) one level down under artificial physical object (Q8205328) and
2. use visual artwork (Q4502142) directly, e.g. on polyptych (Q1278452).

Both might have problems and isn't a very good idea in my eyes:

1. this gets problematic for works of video art (Q682010), virtual art (Q7935068) some works of conceptual art (Q203209) which aren't defined through their physical manifestation and so on,
2. I liked to keep at least one “art”-free class tree for those objects like polyptych (Q1278452) and so on, “art” is all but well-defined and the use of the term brings problems without advantages I think.

Before further proceeding, it might be worth to discuss those higher classes at Wikidata talk:WikiProject Visual arts. What do you think? (The earliest related discussion which already touched those problems is afaik Wikidata talk:WikiProject Visual arts/Item structure#Root item.) Best, --Marsupium (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Choice of images

Hi Nurni, I noticed you removed one of the images from In the Auvergne (Q20268561). My robot didn't replace the image because it needed a human eye. Compare the two images:

Did you just keep the one with the biggest file size because the right one has really horrible colours, is not sharp and part of the painting is missing. Multichill (talk) 13:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Reply would be appreciated. I seem to have lost the "?": Did you just keep the one with the biggest file size? Multichill (talk) 22:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@Multichill: I kept the biggest one with the highest resolution. But the removed one is better - not cropped and sharper. Nurni (talk) 10:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Master of the Straus Madonna

Noticed you marked is as a duplicate. It's now merged at Master of the Straus Madonna (Q1918400). Multichill (talk) 16:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Plant-derived motif

I'm not sure why you changed plant-derived motif (Q43116871) to subclass of "artistic theme" and left the reference to the AAT. AAT specifically has it as a subclass of "motif" which I have added back - I'm slowly building out the AAT hierarchy for designs, patterns, and motifs. I've left artistic theme as an additional subclass. - PKM (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Mikołaj Tomicki

Hello Nurni, can you please check Mikołaj Tomicki (Q26270977)? (Unfortunately I do not speak Polish.) I removed:

• Mikołaj Tomicki (student in 1564) has brother: Piotr Tomicki (b. 1464)

They might be related but not as brothers. Probably you can find out more. Cheers --Kolja21 (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

@Ghuron: Also this statment is questionable:

• Mikołaj Tomicki (student in 1564) has son: Jan Tomicki (1519-1575)

--Kolja21 (talk) 14:27, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Nurni did not remove it ([5]). He did not "respond" to this problem. You should ask Emu or someone else from your group to block. You apply double standards. It's sad. Matlin (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Rock paintings: genre of paintings?

I am updating Finnish archaeological heritage items as part updates for Wiki Loves Monuments. In relation to this I also work on the typologies of Finnish archaeological items. I find it problematic that you have mass edited instance of (P31) statements from cave painting (Q214334) to painting (Q3305213) and made cave painting (Q214334) the genre (P136) of the item. I think this is forcing to regard the items as visual arts only, and preventing from taking advantage of the semantics of archaeology. I would argue that for visual arts purposes it would be possible to query also cave painting (Q214334) as subclass of (P279) painting (Q3305213). Let's discuss! – Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 08:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

As I did not get your reply, I discussed this in the Project chat. Based on that discussion, I will revert your changes that are made on items from the Finnish Heritage Agency data. I hope you agree with me. Best, Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 05:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Nurni,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Nurni,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Module:I18n/wikidata

Hi! You added a couple of Polish translations and I wonder if they are correct (I do not know Polish): "nieznany typ 'claim'" looks like "type 'claim' is an unknown type", not like "type of the claim is unknown", and the same with snak and datavalue. Can you check it? Wikisaurus (talk) 21:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Petrus Dorlandus / Peter van Diest

Hi,

You have added different from (P1889), but how is Petrus Dorlandus (Q577408) different from Peter van Diest (Q2984676)? They have the same dates, the same ids and both nl wiki say it's an alias.

We should add said to be the same as (P460) and ask nlwiki to merge them. — eru ^{[Talk] [french wiki]} 14:27, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

We sent you an e-mail

Hello Nurni,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

WE-Framework

Cześć, być może nie znasz tego narzędzia: WE-Framework. Pozwala edytować element podczas oglądania artykułu w innym projekcie, dając wiele usprawnień i wygody. Bardzo polecam. Matlin (talk) 22:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Sejm-wielki.pl

Cześć, jak chcesz, to możesz zrobić "manual sync" katalogu sejm-wielki.pl. Jest tam ze 400 dopasowań, które mogą zostać przeniesione na Wikidane XD Matlin (talk) 09:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Or @Чаховіч Уладзіслаў:. Matlin (talk) 10:26, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

@Emu Nurni should be banned by you XD Matlin (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Emu, please ban Nurni until(s)he answers. Matlin (talk) 08:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Or Nurni, run this batch, or just say: No, i don't want to do it. I will understand this. Matlin (talk) 09:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

@Matlin nie interesują mnie twoje prywatne batalie i proszę nie spamuj na mojej stronie dyskusji. EOT Nurni (talk) 09:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Nie spamuję, czekałem aż odpiszesz (11 października - 16 października - 28 października). Wg Emu trzeba odpisywać, bo inaczej konto jest blokowane. Poza tym skąd pomysł o "prywatnych bataliach"? Nie prowadzę żadnej.
@Emu: Nurni used non-constructive answer (see in translator) and semi-personal attack.. He is not blocked, nor warned, while I am, even not doing anything wrong. You can see what the campaign led by, among others, by you, Kolja and other German-speaking users. Users are prejudiced against me. I am writing to them - they have a grudge. I don't write anything - they have a grudge, they block me. This is absurd.
For the last few days I have been sacrificing my mental health (palpitations, nightmares, somatic pains ...) to write something, but you can see that it does not bring anything positive (and it is not my fault, at least in large part). You interrupted my work so that I should "respond" - for no purpose. Any error was removed because of constructive parts of my responds. This is terrible. Matlin (talk) 11:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Ale też, widzę, odpowiedź na poziomie. Ścigasz się chyba ze mną, żeby dopasować jak najwięcej z katalogu, który ja scrapowałem dniami i nocami, a ciężko ci dodać brakujące identyfikatory (696) dwoma kliknięciami, a co dopiero wypowiedzieć się na ten temat. Żałosne. Matlin (talk) 18:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Nurni really doesn't answers. There are not "responded" topics: [6], [7], [8]. I will check another later. (for now, however, I do not want to XD) Matlin (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Karol Stromenger (1885-1975)

Witaj. Dotyczy powyższego, występuje dwukrotnie jako "Q96748598" i "Q112326690". Nie wiem jak tego "Q112326690" skasować. Dzięki z góry za ewentualną pomoc. pozdr 95.116.138.163 16:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)