Wikidata:WikiProject Epigraphy

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

History[edit]

This project was imagined during the activities of Project testi latini, specifically from these final considerations. The need was further confirmed by another discussion on Twitter with another user.

From the workflow in the domain of cultural heritage it can be predicted that thousands of items of epigraphs are going to be created on Wikidata over the next years, therefore some coordination is necessary to monitor their creation and their quality.

Interested users[edit]

[+] Add yourself to the list

The participants listed below can be notified using the following template in discussions:
{{Ping project|Epigraphy}}

Guidelines[edit]

instances[edit]

  • in a probable future, all items related to the inscriptions and items related to the archeological artifacts or monuments where such content appears will be separated because Wikidata is constantly increasing its precision. It's the correct thing to do for example for some future listing on wikisource.
  • At the moment, however, we can separate in distinct items text and material object only in the rare cases when the text is present in more artifacts. For all other simpler cases, we can use a double instance for instance of (P31) that we can monitor with appropriate query, including an argument related to subclasses of archaeological find (Q10855061) or archaeological artifact (Q220659).
  • Such argument should be as specific as possible, namely: stele (Q178743) , sarcophagus (Q48634), altar (Q101687)
  • In the future, using a bot to duplicate all items seem feasible if all other metadata are correctly encoded in a coherent way.
  • For the metadata on commons for example the need should be for tags of both the artifacts and the inscription, but one tag can be sufficient at the moment.
  • in case the inscription and the artifact are already separated in different category on Wikimedia Commons, the creation of different items can be done immediately.
  • All qualifiers for instance of (P31) are generally discouraged, in accordance to general use.

metadata related to the physical object[edit]

metadata related to the inscription[edit]

These metadata might be be in a future moved almost entirely to a dedicated item about the inscription

Information from CIL[edit]

  • main description (at least in English): example CIL III, 4591
  • aliases: example
CIL III 4591
CIL 3 4591
CIL 3, 4591
CIL III, 004591
Note: this comes from Commons, automatically it's the label given if Wikidata infobox is inserted. I will keep it like that. We agreed not to insist on "0"s but this is stricly related to interwiki standards

Other aspects[edit]

IDs[edit]

see also {{Ancient world properties}}

Existing[edit]

if you need to connect an item piece of cultural heritage to a Commons category of its inscription, please notice that images are clear, but writing are not usually on the information provided in written form. The best strategy is to search strings on google books.
Informed on social media: IG FB TW
Informed on social media: IG FB TW
Informed on social media: IG FB TW
Informed on social media: IG [1] TW
Informed on social media: IG FB TW

TBD[edit]

example 1
example 2

Queries[edit]

#title:Instances of inscription + subclass of archaeological artifact or monument
SELECT ?item
WHERE {
  ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q1640824 ; wdt:P31/wdt:P279* wd:Q220659, wd:Q4989906 .
}
Instances of inscription + subclass of archaeological artifact or monument

Some external discussion[edit]