Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Koavf 3

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

---

koavf 3

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 8 July 2023 13:16 (UTC)

• koavf (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

I am a trusted user and admin on species: and outreach: in addition to having many advanced rights on q:en:, s:mul:, etc.. I was one of the initial admins here: Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Koavf and would like to help with maintenance tasks. I'd encourage users to see my other request as well from several years ago, my efforts to insert semantic data and internationalization best practices on other WMF wikis, Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Koavf 2 and take into account my judgement posting to Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard, making new items on this project, and using rollback locally. I have made editing Wikidata a part of my regular work flow with related projects (particularly en.wp) and I'd like to think I'd be an asset in fighting vandalism (see my work on en.wq, mul.ws) and doing basic maintenance here (see my work on en.wikt). @Ymblanter: as the closing admin of my second proposal, for visibility and as he encouraged me to try again at a later date. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

For context, I am native en-US speaker, competent in es and have some proficiency in de and pt. I edit on a UTC+4 kind of schedule. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Votes

1.  Support Mbch331 (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
2.  Support I expect the candidate will keep on being an active user here. --Wolverène (talk) 13:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
3.  Support MisterSynergy (talk) 13:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
4.  Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
5.  Support --Epìdosis 19:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
6.  Support Neriah (talk) 22:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
7.  Initial support
   • very few modifications on the properties,
   • sometimes, the use of mw-rollback is not justified and mw-undo vandalism. Cordially. ―Eihel (talk) 04:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
8.  Support --Fralambert (talk) 19:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
9.  Support No issues with the failed last request, thanks for helping out. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 19:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
10.  Support –– Yahya (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
11.  Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
12.  Support --Rzuwig^► 13:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
13.  Support --Esteban16 (talk) 00:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
14.  Support --Okkn (talk) 10:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
15.  Oppose No need for another admin. Matlin (talk) 13:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
16.  Support. Geagea (talk) 21:10, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
17.  Support --Gymnicus (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Comments

• On Special:Diff/1929570577 by User:Matlin: the statement No need for another admin. is plain wrong. We could have 50 more admins and they would not be bored. There is more than enough to do, so dear editors: please consider running for admin if there is a reasonable chance for you to get promoted … —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  • @MisterSynergy: I think we both know why Matlin in particular might have a problem with more admins. Mahir256 (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

    Yes, I am aware of that situation. However, User:Matlin has not provided a reason for their comment, so we do not need to speculate about their motivation. I basically just wanted to make sure that nobody feels discouraged from running for adminship based on what they claimed here. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

    For what it's worth, I'm not. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.