User talk:Matěj Suchánek

Hi! I have noticed today that there had been in 2022 a dramatically wrong merge of collezione libraria (Q62108745) into collana editoriale (Q20655472); the two concepts are clearly distinct, the first being a collection of books formed by a collector/library institution etc., the second being a collection of books formed by the publisher itself. Unfortunately KrBot changed the first into the second in nearly 3k items and for some reason I cannot undo the batch through EditGroups because it says that the batch has been archived. Could you, with your bot, undo the batch? Thanks very much in advance!

Edited 09:27, 11 September 2024 10 days ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

Hi. I have just had it undone all.

17:25, 11 September 2024 9 days ago

missing huge LTA still halfway unblocked globally

3 comments • 09:48, 10 September 2024 11 days ago

3

171.6.52.235 (talkcontribs)

THESE all still UN-blocked globally LTA accounts, who are conforming to placed much BELOW already globally blocked EXAMPLES too MUST be globally blocked as well, they all without exempt are:

Common trait of them all ABOVE and BELOW is harassing THANKING at "Hoa Binh":

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=thanks&user=&page=Hoa_binh

these ACCOUNTS are examples for above case and are already globally BLOCKED and their featuring of both FECES and VIKINGS and "WPEDZICH" etc... in names and/or edit sumaries are:

171.6.52.235 09:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Reply 09:48, 7 September 2024 14 days ago

171.6.52.235 (talkcontribs)

First account shows "hidden global block", but rest... NOPE! please report them all for proper global block, thank you!

Reply 12:13, 7 September 2024 14 days ago

103.191.196.44 (talkcontribs)

UPDATE: roughly half of them is already globally banned by EPIC. There still remains other half which escaped notice:

Please report it to w:m:SRG. Thank you. 103.191.196.44 09:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Reply 09:37, 10 September 2024 11 days ago

Reply to "missing huge LTA still halfway unblocked globally"

moveProperty.js?

2 comments • 14:23, 30 August 2024 22 days ago

2

Queryzo (talkcontribs)

Hey Matej, I use moveClaim.js, this is very useful, thank you! For some actions it would be great to have such script for properties as well, f.e. to move complex statements with a few qualifiers like in https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q3220608&oldid=631936872 (P179 -> P4908).

07:29, 8 March 2018 6 years ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

I agree.

07:59, 8 March 2018 6 years ago

Issue of Special:AbuseFilter/48

2 comments • 14:19, 30 August 2024 22 days ago

2

Kanashimi (talkcontribs)

Hi. I try to `wbsetdescription` with language "tg-latn", value="maqolai ilmiy". But it hits Special:AbuseFilter/48 (Special:AbuseLog/22137151). However, I can update manually using `wbeditentity`. Is this an expected behavior?

21:09, 6 March 2022 2 years ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

Hi! Thanks for your report, I fixed the filter to ignore codes like *-latn. Indeed, filters can be bypassed using wbeditentity and it isn't really possible to fix that.

09:38, 7 March 2022 2 years ago

Vandalism 2

3 comments • 14:13, 30 August 2024 22 days ago

3

Ыфь77 (talkcontribs)

Online translation: Please re-hide the vandal's edit in Talk:Q5201818 and my discussion page, as well as block 109.81.89.189.

13:08, 29 June 2024 2 months ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

Hidden. I chose protection over block since the IP changed, though range blocking is possible if attacks persist. Please prefer reporting to WD:AN.

13:23, 29 June 2024 2 months ago

Ыфь77 (talkcontribs)

Online translation: Thank you. The main thing is that the result is achieved: no vandalism on 2 pages.

14:39, 29 June 2024 2 months ago

Wikidata pops out in search results

10 comments • 14:10, 30 August 2024 22 days ago

10

Screamborn (talkcontribs)

This is my article in Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisanto_Rances and here's the URL when I got the results for Wikidata. Please check it out, you'll see Wikidata as part of the search results- https://ph.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?hspart=iry&hsimp=yhs-fullyhosted_011&type=mcy_mcrltm_16_09&param1=yhsbeacon&param2=f%3D4%26b%3DFirefox%26cc%3DPH%26p%3Dmcyahoo%26cd%3D2XzuyEtN2Y1L1QzutDyEtD0E0Ezz0CzytG0F0B0AyEtGyDtD0CzytG0BtCtB0EtGtBtBtC0F0E0F0A0FzzyC0A0EtN1L1G1B1V1N2Y1L1Qzu2S0F0B0F0ByCyC0FtAtG0B0Bzz0AtGyEtA0E0FtG0ByCtAyBtG0EyEzy0Fzy0EyDyE0D0C0Czy2QtN1Q2Zzu0StCyDtBtCtN1L2XzutAtFyDtFtCyDtFtCtN1L1CzutN1B2Z1V1T1S1Nzu%26cr%3D1362335862%26a%3Dmcy_mcrltm_16_09&p=crisanto+rances

I spoke with Alpho. So, how can we hide Wikidata from showing up in search results-~~~~

06:21, 19 September 2016 8 years ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

Why do we have to? What's wrong on having Wikidata showing up in search results?

12:10, 19 September 2016 8 years ago

Screamborn (talkcontribs)

Because out of all the articles I've tried to search online to see if their Wikidata will appear for search, I tried it over and over but unfortunately it didn't, but when I search mine it shows up. I just don't feel its acceptable to have it shown while others don't. I want to go on but I guess I made my point. Is it just fine to delete as such?

13:22, 19 September 2016 8 years ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

So the problem is that you can hit no Wikidata item using that engine except this one? Maybe that depends on how complete the item you tried to seach for is. But it still looks like a problem of the search engine, not Wikidata one unless there's a software bug (which you would have to discuss with our developers). I really don't know what can be done about this. I believe that all items are indexed in the same way so each should have the same chance on being in search results...

13:33, 19 September 2016 8 years ago

Screamborn (talkcontribs)

Yes, except this one. When I search for articles I make sure to put exactly the same name as specified in the article so I won't miss anything, but as I said, almost all of them don't give a single chance to show their Wikidata except mine. If all items are indexed or sort out in the same manner as it should be, well, I guess there's really a software bug that should be fixed, and I believe, that way it could fix my problem. The catch now is, whether or not my Wikidata appears in a search, it should be kept confidential for searching, and limited only for users who can edit it.

13:52, 19 September 2016 8 years ago

ChristianKl (talkcontribs)

It's up to a search enging to decide whether they find it valuable to show a link to their audience. In most cases it seems search engines don't find Wikidata valuable enough to show it to their users. In this case it seems like a search engine wants to provide readers the article. It's Yahoo's business if they consider certain items worth featuring in their search and not others.

In this case I don't see any reason why the Wikidata item should be kept confidential for searching and confidentiality goes against the spirit on Wikidata in the first place.

Edited 10:15, 20 September 2016 8 years ago

Screamborn (talkcontribs)

I guess there's really a software bug in your system because even this conversation pops out in search results at Yahoo. This is embarrassing and frustrating on my part . Please fix your system, otherwise, I'll delete Wikidata.

05:59, 21 September 2016 8 years ago

Screamborn (talkcontribs)

By the way here's the link result to this conversation at Yahoo - www.wikidata.org/wiki/Topic:Tbugr1auj56uoac5

06:01, 21 September 2016 8 years ago

ChristianKl (talkcontribs)

There's no intention on the part of Wikidata not to show up in search results. It's a feature not a bug if a search engine thinks a page is worth showing.

As far as deleting content on Wikidata, that would be vandalism and likely reverted.

12:42, 21 September 2016 8 years ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

Ok, this has gone too far. If you think, your privacy was violated, then continue with wmf:Privacy policy. But there's nothing we can do about Yahoo search engine, sorry.

13:49, 21 September 2016 8 years ago

Q60378097

One comment • 14:09, 30 August 2024 22 days ago

1

Summary last edited by Matěj Suchánek 14:06, 30 August 2024 22 days ago

my mistake, sorry.

Ankry (talkcontribs)

This your bot's edit is incorrect. The eswiki text definitely is not a Polish anonymous translation published in Warsaw (Q270) in 1932. And no way can be merged with this item. If you wish to add it somewhere, you can add it to a "work" item linked from Czarny tulipan (Q60378097).

17:45, 13 April 2019 5 years ago

kulturnoe-nasledie.ru ID

6 comments • 14:05, 30 August 2024 22 days ago

6

50.254.21.213 (talkcontribs)

I tried to fix but was reverted.

(cur | prev) 06:32, 28 February 2018‎ YMS (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (13,231 bytes) (+93)‎ . . (Reverted edits by 50.254.21.213 (talk) to last revision by Matěj Suchánek)(undo) (Tag: Rollback)
went to the dussiction page but ?
Property talk:P1483
http://nasledie-archive.ru/
~~~~

15:18, 28 February 2018 6 years ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

What does this have to do with me?

Edited 16:34, 28 February 2018 6 years ago

YMS (talkcontribs)

Yeah, it was me who reverted, and Matěj just happened to be the one who edited this property before. I didn't see the note on the property talk page before, but still: The subject of a property should not be changed. If the archive hasn't just been renamed, but replaced by another, similar one, there should be a new property for it.

17:48, 28 February 2018 6 years ago

50.254.21.213 (talkcontribs)

OK!

21:43, 28 February 2018 6 years ago

50.254.21.213 (talkcontribs)

OK ! then who does that ?

21:49, 28 February 2018 6 years ago

50.254.21.213 (talkcontribs)

Wikidata:Project chat#kulturnoe-nasledie.ru

13:54, 1 March 2018 6 years ago

MatSuBot: preserve labels

4 comments • 14:04, 30 August 2024 22 days ago

4

Pommée (talkcontribs)

In French please preserve (simple dames), (double dames), (simple messieurs) and (double messieurs). Pommée (overleg) 12:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Edited 12:08, 10 February 2024 7 months ago

Pommée (talkcontribs)

Look what happened here. You rightly added (kobiety) (meaning women) in Polish, but incorrectly deleted (women) in English. Please preserve (men) and (women) in English. Pommée (overleg) 14:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Edited 14:36, 5 August 2024 1 month ago

Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribs)

Adapted English, French and Polish labels.

16:50, 5 August 2024 1 month ago

Pommée (talkcontribs)

Thanks! Pommée (overleg) 19:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

19:00, 5 August 2024 1 month ago

User talk:Matěj Suchánek

About this board

Restoring/Redoing my contributions

Undoing an old batch

missing huge LTA still halfway unblocked globally

moveProperty.js?

Issue of Special:AbuseFilter/48

Vandalism 2

Wikidata pops out in search results

Q60378097

kulturnoe-nasledie.ru ID

MatSuBot: preserve labels

Navigation menu

Search