Wikidata:Property proposal/Offshore leaks database ID

Offshore leaks database ID[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization

Done: Offshore Leaks Database ID (P10083) (Talk and documentation)

Description	identifier in Offshore leaks database
Represents	Offshore Leaks Database (Q108935620)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	organization (Q43229)
Example 1	StLaurent Holdco (Q94640530) → 55057488
Example 2	Prague Property Holding (BVI) (Q104223936) → 82009630
Example 3	ACP Partners Limited (Q88007860) → 56033568
Example 4	Capital Ventures International (Q104626435) → 82002302
Source	https://offshoreleaks.icij.org
Number of IDs in source	785000
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/nodes/$1

Motivation[edit]

Interesting database for additional information about companies. Skim (talk) 13:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Support Looks interesting! ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting database! Database (respectively its frontend) use the same formatter for officers for entities (organizations), intermediaries (organizations), officers (persons) and addresses, although in dump, these are differentiated. I think it would be appropriate to associate property only with organizations, as suggested (possibly propose a separate property for officers). --Jklamo (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, but indeed it's pity that the formatterURL is the same for organizations and persons. RShigapov (talk) 08:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Companies --Jklamo (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Could someone please contact them and ask for splitting into multiple formatter URLs and write here? Should be trivial to implement if the DB already has the data.--So9q (talk) 12:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I send email to ICIJ. Skim (talk) 13:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose given the problematic nature of the website. We avoid linking to websites that mainly host copyvios and the like.
Further, it's already sufficiently annoying to occasionally have to differentiate Wiki-pedia from a similar website with "wiki" in its name, so let's steer clear of it. --- Jura 13:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what are you referring to. Maybe some confusion with WikiLeaks (Q359)? --Jklamo (talk) 14:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose there may be a risk that Wikidata eventually gets confused with the site you name by the inclusion of such data. --- Jura 12:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]