Property talk:P5965

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• String length
• List of qualifiers
• Count

LUBW Protected Area No
unique number of a protected area in the German state of Baden-Württemberg

Data type	External identifier
Allowed values	[1-9]\d{10}
Example	Teich auf dem Konnenberg (Q54313423) → 81190550019 Waldwiese und Baumgruppe, Plüderhausen (Q54314517) → 81190550015 Amphibienteich an der Göppinger Steige (Q54315681) → 81190670056
Related to country	Germany (Q183) (See 347 others) (Baden-Württemberg (Q985))
See also	Baden-Württemberg protected area ID (P6659)
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties Items with no other external identifier Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Chart by item creation date Database reports/Constraint violations/P5965 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 14,399 Main statement 14,396 out of 14,000 (103% complete) >99.9% of uses Qualifier 3 <0.1% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5965#Single value, SPARQL

Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5965#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)

Format “[1-9]\d{10}”: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5965#Format, SPARQL

Item “instance of (P31)”: Items with this property should also have “instance of (P31)”. (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5965#Item P31, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL

Item “country (P17): Germany (Q183)”: Items with this property should also have “country (P17): Germany (Q183)”. (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5965#Item P17, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5965#Entity types

Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P5965#Scope, SPARQL

URL formatter

@Pintoch: Thanks for creating this property, but IMHO you were wrong with adding a formatter URL. In the request, I wrote However, this identifyer has no relation to the URL of the item in the source, i. e. it cannot be used to create a web link - the web link must be queried and stored in a separate field. As expected, the generated links lead into 404. --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 17:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

@Dealerofsalvation: oh ok, sorry about that! Feel free to remove it then. − Pintoch (talk) 17:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

will do - so this does not affect the justification for the existence of this property? --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Done. Is this[1] the right way to use the property and the URL? --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 20:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC)