Property talk:P223

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

galaxy morphological type
galaxy morphological classification code
Descriptionmorphological classification of the galaxy - galaxy morphological classification (Q1648748).
Representsgalaxy morphological classification (Q1648748)
Data typeString
Template parameteren:Template:Infobox galaxy type
Domain
According to this template: galaxies - galaxy (Q318)
According to statements in the property:
galaxy (Q318)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values(E(\d){0,1})|(S(A|B|AB){0,1}[0abcdm]{0,2})|(I)
Example
According to this template:
According to statements in the property:
Andromeda (Q2469) → SA
Triangulum Galaxy (Q13724) → SAc
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Sourcehttp://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total120,431
Main statement120,429>99.9% of uses
Qualifier2<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “galaxy (Q318): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “galaxy (Q318)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P223#Type Q318, SPARQL
Format “E\d?|S(A|B|AB)?[0abcdm]{0,2}|I: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P223#Format, SPARQL
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P223#Single value, SPARQL
Qualifiers “reason for deprecated rank (P2241), reason for preferred rank (P7452): this property should be used only with the listed qualifiers. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P223#allowed qualifiers, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Conflicts with “subclass of (P279): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P223#Conflicts with P279, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P223#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Multi-lingual or not?[edit]

Currently the data type is mono-lingual. Should it be converted?

We should be restrictive to string types, so please do not create them as fast. Is the allowed values a limited set - meaning that we can create items for each of them?

The property is still not used in any item. Mange01 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much to complete the information of the property: In creating other properties in future, I will use this scheme. I used this property in Andromeda Galaxy as example! Is there a bug? I evaluated the possibility to use a multi language string, but the morphological classification is rigorously established (see here for example or this professional article). I checked Andromeda Galaxy voices in all languages (with latin and non-latin fonts) and, where the classification is present, the same latin characters are used. So, in my opinion, mono-lingual string type is enough for this property. --Paperoastro (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hubble or more general?[edit]

I'm no astronomer, but is it appropriate to refer to this as a Hubble sequence? The English label corresponds to en:Galaxy morphological classification, which lists a few classification systems, of which the Hubble sequence is only one of. However, the German label is "Hubble-Sequenz", and that's what, quickly scanning, the submitted values seemed to be. Which should be the final label? Enoirditalk 13:54, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As explained in the incipit of the article en:Galaxy morphological classification, the most used (by astronomers) and famous classification system is the Hubble sequence and its revised version proposed by de Vaucouleurs and Sandage, so, imho, there is no possibility to refer as galaxy morphological type and intend another type of system. Thanks to this discussion, I'm going to add also the alias De Vaucouleurs classification system and Hubble sequence to the property. Concerning the interlinks to the English article en:Galaxy morphological classification, you have right: probably is better to create another item for the articles that explain only the Hubble sequence. --Paperoastro (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

format constraint[edit]

set it [a-zA-Z()]+ so at least html and wiki syntax isn't alowed. --Akkakk 23:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

added ( bc)?( pec(uliar)?)? to allow bc, be pec and peculiar --Akkakk 10:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]