Άννα Παναγιωτοπούλου ΟΧΙ Γέννηση 30 Απριλίου 1945 ,30 Απριλίου 1947
User talk:Bovlb
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
@D.S. Lioness: I have merged these threads. Five threads on the same topic is at least four too many, especially as discussion should be taking place elsewhere.
Regarding Wikidata:Requests for comment/Sources of data, it's only been a few days, but the lack of response may be because of your failure to read and and follow the instructions at Wikidata:Requests for comment. What you posted is a question, not a request for comments.
where i have to put the question, please ?
Duplicate threads Topic:Y4y67d6glsd282uo; Topic:Y4u14xha5h8k94rd, Topic:Y4wnpm2795if4lr3, Topic:Y4x5d7wk5i8xpfi7.
If your concern is about the specific item, Talk:Q4767397. For a more general question, Wikidata:Project chat or Wikidata:Αγορά.
I gave you a partial block from this item (in an attempt) to prevent edit warring, and you were one of those removing sourced claims. If you have further questions about protection and blocking, you can raise them at Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_semi_protection_Q4767397.
I would appreciate it if you could answer the question I have been asking for so many days here Wikidata:Requests for comment/Sources of data - Wikidata and no one has answered. Thank you in advance
Άννα Παναγιωτοπούλου Γέννηση 30 Ιουλίου 1945 / 30 Ιουλίου 1947
Άννα Παναγιωτοπούλου λάθος ΟΧΙ Γέννηση 1947
You should be discussing this at either Talk:Q4767397 or Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_semi_protection_Q4767397 but in brief, we do not generally delete attested claims, even if they conflict and we decided to prefer one to another.
Please, User:235 inikos removed claims about 1947 date of birth.https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q4767397&diff=prev&oldid=2155358292
I believe the current state reflects the available sources. If you have more, please provide them. I'll keep an eye on it.
Of course i have more, plenty of them. But which is the meαning ? To jam up the entry ? or write something reliable ?
You blocked me from editing ?? and not the other users who remove sourced claims ???
This is not the first time we have had an entry with multiple attested dates of birth (e.g. S. E. Hinton (Q117425)). Deletion of attested claims is not the solution. Better sourcing and discussion is the way.
My sourcing is the best greek sites, discussion i can;t have in my own, no one interests to discuss.
Άννα Παναγιωτοπούλου Γέννηση 30 Ιουλίου 1945 / 1947
Άννα Παναγιωτοπούλου λάθος ΟΧΙ Γέννηση 30 Απριλίου 1945 ,30 Απριλίου 1947
You may like to participate in the conversation at Wikidata:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_semi_protection_Q4767397
Please I need your guidance, I've tried so much to get better, but it seems difficult to me.
I'm not sure how to advise you. The only thing you seem to have attempted here is creating an item on "Kemelord", but you stopped without creating any claims. You might find it helpful to read Help:Contents.
I’ve almost finished, but was taken down. Is it still possible to still make claims for recover?
Can you explain how this items meets our notability criteria? You might also find it helpful to read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion and User:Bovlb/How to create an item on Wikidata so that it won't get deleted.
Dear Bovlb,
I hope you are doing well,
We are a group of researchers from King’s College London working on developing WQT (Wikidata Quality Toolkit), which will support a diverse set of editors in curating and validating Wikidata content.
We are inviting you to participate in an online workshop aimed at understanding the requirements for designing effective and easy-to-use user interfaces (UI) for three tools within WQT that can support the daily activities of Wikidata editors: recommending items to edit based on their personal preferences, finding items that need better references, and generating entity schemas automatically for better item quality.
The main activity during this workshop will be UI mockup sketching. To facilitate this, we encourage you to attend the workshop using a tablet or laptop with PowerPoint installed or any other drawing tools you prefer. This will allow for a more interactive and productive session as we delve into the UI mockup sketching activities.
Participation is completely voluntary. You should only take part if you want to and choosing not to take part will not disadvantage you in any way. However, your cooperation will be valuable for the WQT design. Please note that all data and responses collected during the workshop will be used solely for the purpose of improving the WQT and understanding editor requirements. We will analyze the results in an anonymized form, ensuring your privacy is protected. Personal information will be kept confidential and will be deleted once it has served its purpose in this research.
The online workshop, which will be held on April 5th, should take no more than 3 hours.
If you agree to participate in this workshop, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form to register your interest https://forms.office.com/e/9mrE8rXZVg Then, I will contact you with all the instructions for the workshop.
For more information about my project, please read this page: https://king-s-knowledge-graph-lab.github.io/WikidataQualityToolkit/
If you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me at the email address mentioned above.
Thank you for considering taking part in this project.
Regards
Please Undelete the following items:
I will fill them.
Done. Please fill them in soon to avoid deletion.
Courtesy CC of @ MisterSynergy as other deleting admin.
Hello, I wanted to let you know that the Lake Como LTA is back as 37.119.11.7 (discussione • contributi • registri), 31.190.224.198 (discussione • contributi • registri) and 93.64.9.58 (discussione • contributi • registri).
Hi, this is in regard to our earlier question in Wikidata:Project chat (Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2024/02#Replacement of Singapore Infopedia ID). We've renamed the current property P8350 as Singapore Infopedia ID (former scheme) and tried proposing a new property Singapore Infopedia ID at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control, but it bring us back to this existing page Wikidata:Property proposal/Singapore Infopedia ID. Is this the correct procedure for the replacement of old property? Could you advise how we should proceed from here? Thank you.
I suggest that you name the property proposal with "new scheme". The name of the proposal page doesn't have to be the final label name.
Thank you for advice! We managed to propose a new Singapore Infopedia ID at Wikidata:Property proposal/Singapore Infopedia ID (new scheme). However, we have not received any feedback from the community. Is there anyway we can proceed from here, or anyone we can approach to get the approval from the community?
Unfortunately, it can be rather slow to get feedback on property proposals. I'll try to take a look tomorrow.