Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Hazard-SJ

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

 Not done: Non-steward closure - after more than two weeks, there is insufficient support at this time. Note that I !voted neutral on this request, but if you feel that this close is improper, please revert it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

---

User:Hazard-SJ

I also have seen many empty entries. I intend to populate where I can and delete otherwise. I'd love to be available to aid issues that may arise such as vandalism (I have the rollback right on a few wikis, and am currently a member of the SWMT). I intend to open myself to maintenance of the project in general, including edits upon consensus (where appropriate). -- Hazard-SJ  ✈  02:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Support. --Vituzzu (talk) 10:36, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

•  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → ^(écrire) 15:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose: he had to be desysoped on testwiki. Nemo 13:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • ...by you, unilaterally and a month after the triggering incident, because he did something that several other admins supported doing. This is also Sven Manguard 15:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
    • Unilateral? I see a steward and two sysops complaining about what he did, and none supporting. Anyway, the other users can judge themselves, that's the only purpose of my link. (My vote can as well be ignored.) Nemo 23:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
      • As I might have mentioned before, "I don't believe it is appropriate in any condition to undo another sysop's actions without speaking with the sysop first, so I undid it and notified him." I believe that in general, any community would agree with this thought. Hwever, that is just my opinion.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  02:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
        • So basically, "I don't believe it is appropriate in any condition to undo another sysop's actions without speaking with the sysop first, so I undid another sysop's action without speaking with the sysop first"? Not seeing the logic there tbh. Jafeluv (talk) 12:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose, inactivity since right around this request (3 Nov.) shows a bit of a lack of commitment to me. Don't really think that the testwiki stuff should be taken into account here, though, unless to show something applicable to this project (lack of maturity, etc.) Ajraddatz (talk) 12:49, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMHO, way too radical ideas. I am still waiting for an proposal on Project chat about excluding interwiki links to ‎disambiguation pages. After all, you did ask the devs to do that.--Snaevar (talk) 00:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

  I had already mentioned it in this edit before you added this comment. Feel free to make a comment there.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  02:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Question Why did you go straight to the development team instead of asking the community first? Sven Manguard Wha? 18:36, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

  I agree, that was a bad decision, and I admit that I was wrong for not using Wikidata:Project chat instead. However, I believe I was anticipating some form of consensus there from interested users. However, since that page is directed to developers, I was wrong.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  02:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Neutral per above, as I trust Hazard-SJ otherwise.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:13, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.