Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Citationgraph bot
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Approved--Ymblanter (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Citationgraph bot[edit]
Citationgraph bot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Harej (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s: Add citation relationships between papers on Wikidata.
Code: pmcid_to_cites.py, citation_grapher.py, edit_queue.py.
Function details: There are many Wikidata items about journal articles. This bot connects them to each other via cites work (P2860). Identifying these relationships helps identify the provenance of information from original clinical research to review. This also helps identify influential papers in a given field. The bot will run on a daily basis. --Harej (talk) 05:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Please make some test edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi @Harej: - what's your data source for this? It sounds like a great idea but provenance for this info may be important. ArthurPSmith (talk) 00:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- User:ArthurPSmith, the data comes from PubMed Central and Crossref, which are authoritative bibliographic databases. The data is in the public domain. Each statement I add notes the source used, including the API call used and the date of the call. Harej (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Harej, Ymblanter: sounds great - I assume this diff on your own account is an example of what the bot would do? You should go ahead and run a few of these under the bot account so we can see it in action itself but it looks good to me. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I would like to see 50 edits from the bot account as the policy says.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ymblanter, I have made 55 test edits. [1]. Harej (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I would like to see 50 edits from the bot account as the policy says.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Harej, Ymblanter: sounds great - I assume this diff on your own account is an example of what the bot would do? You should go ahead and run a few of these under the bot account so we can see it in action itself but it looks good to me. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- @harej: Great idea! Can I help with this?
- User:ArthurPSmith, the data comes from PubMed Central and Crossref, which are authoritative bibliographic databases. The data is in the public domain. Each statement I add notes the source used, including the API call used and the date of the call. Harej (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- I will approve the bot in a couple of days provided there have been no further issues.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ymblanter, should I continue to make test edits, or are you waiting for something else? Harej (talk) 23:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Let us stop the test edits for a day, see if someone else replies here with future suggestions, and, if not, I will give the flag tomorrow.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ymblanter, should I continue to make test edits, or are you waiting for something else? Harej (talk) 23:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Stop the bot because of scaling issue to avoid catastrophic failure?[edit]
I wrote Harej regarding stopping the bot because of our serious scaling issues. User_talk:Harej#Stop_the_bot?--So9q (talk) 17:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)