Wikidata:Requests for comment/Part of Speech in Lobjan languages need review
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| An editor has requested the community to provide input on "Part of Speech in Lobjan languages need review" via the Requests for comment (RFC) process. This is the discussion page regarding the issue.
If you have an opinion regarding this issue, feel free to comment below. Thank you! |
Instances of Part of speech, Part of Grammaire du Lojban Q6112301 (SPARQL):
- I think Q25389608 and Q55832773 are the same concept. What next ?
- Relatively to Part of speech (Q82042): Not sure those Lobjan items are documented according to Wikidata lexemes and grammatical best practices, relatively to Part of speech (Q82042).
CC top editors of wp articles: @Mednak , Micheletb, ZanderSchubert, GZWDer, Else If Then, 地球发动机: Yug (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- brivla means relation in Lojban, so the two concepts are indeed identical. brivla is the name in Lojban, and „relations en lojban“ is its translation in French (see fr:Relations en lojban#Le modèle prédicatif, note). As for the corresponding part of speech, Lojban is very strange on this aspect. The main parts of speech are grammatical words (cmavo) and non-grammatical (brivla), a secondary (non-grammatical) category being proper names (cmene) (see fr:Grammaire du lojban#Morphologie). Micheletb (talk) 06:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)