Wikidata:Property proposal/reddit AMA

Not done

Description	collaborative press conference on reddit.com
Represents	Reddit (Q1136)
Data type	URL
Domain	people
Allowed values	any link to reddit.com
Example	David Attenborough (Q183337) → [1] Wil Wheaton (Q264699) → [2] Aubrey de Grey (Q175969) → [3] Donald Trump (Q22686) → [4]
Robot and gadget jobs	not sure if possible to import it by bot

To link, sort, and query reddit's Ask Me Anything.--Micru (talk) 13:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose We need to find a better way of doing this; we don't have properties for "interview with the Guardian", "interview with CNN", et al. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think it would make more sense to create an item for noteworthy AMA just like we have items for newspaper articles. A person can be seen as the author of their AMA. ChristianKl (talk) 00:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yeah, not all of them are very notable/interesting. In many cases these have just become a part of the press-junket. Quora has sessions (their version of AMAs). @Pigsonthewing: these are different from interviews though, maybe in the same way an autobiography differs from a biography, which is what makes this class of "interviews" interesting. A more general property would be a good idea. --Azertus (talk) 11:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, The AMAs are more of an informal chat and is no guarantee of truth, considering Reddit is a forum-based website. MechQuester (talk) 06:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Micru, MechQuester, Azertus, Pigsonthewing: Not done. ChristianKl (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu