Wikidata:Property proposal/Catalogue of Life ID 2

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Catalogue of Life ID[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science

Descriptionidentifier of a taxon or synonym in the Catalogue of Life
RepresentsCatalogue of Life (Q38840)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainitem; taxon (Q16521), plant (Q756)
Allowed values[23456789BCDFGHJKLMNPQRSTVWXYZ]{1,6}
Example 1Delphinus delphis (Q207114)34JWM
Example 2animal (Q729)N
Example 3Lespedeza violacea (Q15529295)6Q3GP
Example 4Abies alba (Q146992) → 8K9Y
Example 5plant (Q756) → P
Example 6bird (Q5113) → V2
Example 7Oenanthe (Q28915) 679P
Example 8cougar (Q35255) → 4QHKG
Sourcehttps://www.catalogueoflife.org/
Planned useadding to items edited or created, as well as using in external knowledge graphs
Number of IDs in source4463574, including roughly 2 million accepted species
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
Formatter URLhttps://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/$1
See alsoCatalogue of Life in Taiwan ID (old version) (P3088)
Applicable "stated in"-valueCatalogue of Life (Q38840)

Motivation[edit]

The Catalogue of Life (Q38840) is the world's largest list of the species. Maintained by hundreds of taxonomists, it is also an authoritative source in the biodiversity domain. There already exists property Catalogue of Life in Taiwan ID (old version) (P3088) that is however restricted to the species of Taiwan. Biologists need to be able to cross-link taxa to their Catalogue of Life ID, similar to what they do with other large projects with properties such as GBIF taxon ID (P846), ZooBank ID for name or act (P1746), WoRMS-ID for taxa (P850), IPNI plant ID (P961), IUCN taxon ID (P627), etc.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Franck Michel (talk • contribs) at 09:51, January 13, 2022‎ (UTC).

Discussion[edit]

Previous proposal: Wikidata:Property proposal/Catalogue of Life ID.--GZWDer (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest I actually didn't not remeber I had made this request before. Also, I was not aware of the discussion Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Taxonomy/Archive/2016/03#Property_for_Catalogue_of_Life_(Q38840)?. I'm wondering if this is still so messy today or things got better. If someone can update us that would be nice. Franck Michel (talk) 14:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
COL has changed entirely since those discussion. We have completely rewritten the infrastructure and have put stable IDs in place since December 2021.
There has been a small change this March 2022 described at https://www.catalogueoflife.org/2022/03/23/name-ids to make the COL identifiers purely name oriented. Before they were changed on purpose if the status or the accepted name changed, see https://www.catalogueoflife.org/2021/04/14/stable-ids Doering73 (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Succu, Brya: because you gave your opinion in the previous proposal, what do you think about this new one? Pamputt (talk) 14:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given that CoL is updated yearly, it is not really possible to give an in depth assessment. However, CoL has a very long track record of promoting gruesome errors: I don't see that anybody can use this as a reliable source. However, I am also noting that Wikidata-users are actively creating errors in the taxonomy area by themselves, on their own initiative. So maybe adding this identifier won't make matters all that much worse. - Brya (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]