Talk:Q606060

Edit requests

Hashtags

{{Edit request}}

I ask that the statements women's association football (Q606060)hashtag (P2572)femalesoccer, women's association football (Q606060)hashtag (P2572)femalefootball, women's association football (Q606060)hashtag (P2572)womenfootball, women's association football (Q606060)hashtag (P2572)womensoccer, women's association football (Q606060)hashtag (P2572)womensfootball and women's association football (Q606060)hashtag (P2572)womenssoccer be added. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

The edits were made by the user Bencemac. Thanks a lot for this. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

GND-Kennung

{{Edit request}}

Die Aussage women's association football (Q606060)GND ID (P227)7503113-9 sollte auf den missbilligten Rang gestellt werden und der Qualifikator reason for deprecated rank (P2241)link rot (Q1193907) sollte hinzugefügt werden. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

{{Done}} Korrekte GND 1200878833. --Kolja21 (talk) 14:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Nicht erledigt, zu mindestens nicht auf diese Art und Weise. Das Entfernen von defekten Weblinks ist, wie man an dem Meinungsbild „Handling of stored IDs after they've been deleted or redirected in the external database” sieht, nicht erwünscht. Deswegen sollte die jetzt gültige GND-ID zusätzlich hinzugefügt werden und nicht die ehemalige GND-ID ersetzen. --Gymnicus (talk) 16:10, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Ach Gymnicus, nicht schon wieder. Als Fundstelle bei der defekten ID war lediglich die dt.-sprachige Wikipedia angegeben, dort findet sich die richtige ID. Ich habe daher die fehlerhafte gegen die korrekte GND ausgetauscht.[1] (Fehlerhafte Angaben stehen zu lassen, ist nur dann sinnvoll, wenn eine zitierfähige Quelle vorliegt, z.B. bei einem abweichenden Geburtsjahr.) @MisterSynergy: Da Gymnicus sein altes Verhalten an den Tag legt, wäre es imho sinnvoll, die Sperre seines Accounts wieder in Kraft zu setzen. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC) @Ameisenigel: FYI. --Kolja21 (talk) 20:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

@Kolja21@MisterSynergy Can we close this edit request? Estopedist1 (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Yes, please. --Kolja21 (talk) 18:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Done —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Reversion

Hi @Gymnicus. I agree with your reversion special:diff/1924097477; I was wrong because I did not see that it was a competition class. Sorry. However, is it correct to have association football (Q2736) as a subclass & esport together?. Thanks Amadalvarez (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

@Amadalvarez: All good, no problem. Mistakes like this happen to me too. Can you explain your question in more detail, because I don't fully understand it at the moment? --Gymnicus (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

@Gymnicus, the women's association football (Q606060) or men's association football (Q31930761) items have:

women's association football (Q606060)subclass of (P279)association football (Q2736) women's association football (Q606060)sport (P641)association football (Q2736)

men's association football (Q31930761)subclass of (P279)association football (Q2736) men's association football (Q31930761)sport (P641)association football (Q2736) or

It seems redundant to me, specially comparing with men's U18 association football (Q44418152) or women's U17 association football (Q44419268) that do not have P279.

Maybe it is correct, but I prefer to ask about.

Thanks Amadalvarez (talk) 21:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC)