Talk:Q4817

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Autodescription — column (Q4817)

description: structural element sustaining the weight of a building
Useful links:
Classification of the class column (Q4817)  View with Reasonator View with SQID
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
column⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1)
Generic queries for classes
See also


Meaning

[edit]

@Laddo, Poulpy:. This item defines colums as subclasses of Template:Q192784, matching Wikipedia's definition of a colum. But what do we do with "columns" that do not fit into that definition like victory column (Q1930585) ? --Zolo (talk) 11:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Zolo: IMHO it is an error to derive victory column (Q1930585)  View with Reasonator View with SQID from column (Q4817)  View with Reasonator View with SQID : Q4817 represents the basic functional architectural element, having a structural role, like a pier (Q335297)  View with Reasonator View with SQID (distinct also from pilaster (Q175112)  View with Reasonator View with SQID that is decorative rather than structural). victory column (Q1930585)  View with Reasonator View with SQID is a monument that happens to look like a column. If you can locate an item representing vertical architectural elements that are non-structural, then you might have a valid parent class (and for pilaster (Q175112)  View with Reasonator View with SQID as well). LaddΩ chat ;) 21:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Laddo:. It seems to make sense (even though the illustration of en:Column doesn't help), but if the item does not exist yet, I think we need to create one. Any idea for the label ? --Zolo (talk) 13:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Zolo: "decorative column" or "non-supporting column"? I'll leave that to you, though. LaddΩ chat ;) 22:10, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed subclass of "support" and "shape"

[edit]

Because both of them have superclasses that imply this is non-physical, which isn't true. JesseW (talk) 00:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]