Talk:Q3353723
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — 2006 ECM Prague Open (women) (Q3353723)
description: women's tennis tournament
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “2006 ECM Prague Open (women)” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
itwiki[edit]
@Vinkje83:
The sitelink currently don't seem to match the statements here. Same for enwiki.
--- Jura 15:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- You can repair this by moving the en-wiki and it-wiki articles to a higher-level item (combined male/female tournament).
- Remember this diagram:
+---------------------+
| combined tournament |
+-+-----------------+-+
| |
+-------------------+-+ +-+-------------------+
| ATP tournament | | WTA tournament |
+-+-----------------+-+ +-+-----------------+-+
| | | |
+-------+-------+ +-------+-------+ +-------+-------+ +-------+-------+
| men's singles | | men's doubles | |women's singles| |women's doubles|
+---------------+ +---------------+ +---------------+ +---------------+
- Sure, but if this one is wrong it might not be the only one. I'll try to find a way to dig them up. @MisterSynergy: have you come across some as well?
--- Jura 15:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)- There are lots of those cases, as far as I see mostly as a residual of pre-Wikidata times. I haven’t yet spent any effort into a better organization, but I do see some potential to identify a reasonable fraction of cases automatically. This requires some coding first: a script that looks for linked tennis players in all connected sitelinks; for male- or female-only tournaments, clearly >90% of all linked persons have typically the same gender, while mixed tournaments are more at 50%±30%). I have successfully used something similar for competition class identification, so this approach might be valuable here as well. Unfortunately I drown in plenty of big Wikidata repair jobs, and there is real life as well of course … :-) —MisterSynergy (talk) 16:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)