Talk:Q327055
Autodescription — worker (Q327055)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “worker” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
worker⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- Generic queries for position
This section is generated using {{Generic queries for positions}}
- List of people holding the position, sorted by starting date (query)
- List of people and their ID's on other systems (query)
- Number of people having hold this position by gender (query) – List of people having hold this position with gender (query)
- Number of people having hold the position by country of citizenship (query) – List of people having hold the position by country of citizenship (query)
- People having hold the function by length of term (query)
- List of people having hold the position by total duration in the position (query)
- List of people having hold the position by gender at the starting date (query)
- List of people holding the function with employer as qualifier (query)
- List of people having hold the position as qualifier of employer (P108) (query)
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
P31: occupation[edit]
P31 removed
Ideally, this item should be a class and not an occupation itself because this item don't give any useful information about the occupation. If no Q5 instance is directly linked with Q327055 by P106, please remove the claim P31: "occupation" on Q327055.
Also this item should not be a subclass of Q5 but a subclass of occupation (I corrected that) and this item should be used with P31 on a more specific occupation than worker, or with P279 on a more specific class of occupations than worker but NOT with P31 on an item instance of Q5 because this doesn't make any sense; instead, please use an item instance of this one with P106. — Metamorforme42 (talk) 16:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
compare with manual worker (Q33394058) and employee (Q703534)[edit]
d1g (talk) 02:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- employee (Q703534) has nothing in common with it. Many white-collar worker (Q368758) are employee (Q703534). --Infovarius (talk) 21:11, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
I do not agree with the revert, as in English Wikipedia, "worker" is a redirect to "workforce". That means, the topic of "worker" is overlapping to "workforce", and the entry laborer (Q12713481) is creating redundancy. UU (talk) 07:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- @UU: I don't insist on understanding Chinese articles, but "worker" and "workforce" are different notions (like "human" and "humankind") so they can be separated. And laborer (Q12713481) refers to only physical labour (while Q327055 can be a programmer for example) so it is different too. --Infovarius (talk) 16:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hello UU, I restored the versions at laborer (Q12713481), worker (Q327055), blue-collar worker (Q1191714) and laborer (Q19862215) as it seemed to me that at least some of the sitelinks where assigned to wrong items. I agree that the situation involving these items is not perfect and there is a big overlap between laborer (Q12713481) and blue-collar worker (Q1191714) - but there are articles linking to both laborer (Q12713481) and blue-collar worker (Q1191714) in some languages. You know best where to put the Chinese article; but can you give your reasoning for splitting up the other sitelinks at laborer (Q12713481)? Thanks. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 08:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- How about manual work (Q3485549)? I just follow wiki "guideline" that to be BOLD, but you reverted my above edits, so I can`t have good comment. However, it is difficult for readers to track cross-language links if the same concept is divided into 3 entries. UU (talk) 09:55, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- @UU: once more - they are not the same concepts! Do you understand the difference? --Infovarius (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- In Chinese, "manual labour" is NOT "單純勞動", "手工勞動" (Simplified Chinese: "手工劳动") nor "手工勞力", it really refers to "勞動" (Simplified Chinese: "劳动"). Also, for "non-manual labour", it refers to "工作". Please don`t move to workforce (Q13440398), thank you.
subclass of person[edit]
The English description of this class is "person who works". How then, can this class not be a subclass of person (or human)? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (talk) 10:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Asterix2023:, who changed it[1]. Additionally this item is now both a subclass and an (indirect) instance of role (Q4897819). - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- I see that this person is currently blocked. I set it back to person. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 11:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Not to forget these edits by Valentina: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q327055&diff=593490234&oldid=590107832 CV213 (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)