Talk:Q2620531

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I think we don't need to say "P17: Azerbaijan applies to part Azerbaijan" any more[edit]

@Bouzinac, Dalmir, Gz260, Nvrandow, Alexis900, Rachmat04: per en:Special:Diff/985037159, it looks like all the E002 sections, east of Armenian east boundary line, are now under Azerbaijan control, enwiki article no longer says "under Artsakh control" for years, if we don't oppose, then I'd love to polish country (P17) values to just have Armenia (Q399) and Azerbaijan (Q227). Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently enwiki's description:

. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove statements ; instead just state them as deprecated if u wish so. Bouzinac💬✒️💛 12:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But that may still make pollutions when local wikis querying this item, aren't they? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging more users about this topic to understand why enwiki did so: @Mappase, Aleksandr Krymsky, Меридианец, Jmg38, BasilLeaf, WMSR:, anyway I would love to nominate Q100324134 for deletion since repeating the name "Azerbaijan" is really nonsense for our purpose, and even Bouzinac's purpose. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I don't see any benefits on claiming "Azerbaijan is part pf Azerbaijan". I was said do not remove valid statements, doesn't mean we can't remove invalid, nonsense, and gibberish statements. Note that this is just my idea and Not A Vote. --223.104.7.139 00:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thx, I nominated. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]