Talk:Q23

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Item main type (GND) (Property:P107) = person (Q215627)" לערי ריינהארט (talk) 08:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P107 doesn't exist anymore so does this comment matter? What does matter: "military rank
>General of the Armies of the United States
>>start time 4 July 1976
>>via Public Law 94-479
>>>contemporary constraint (Help Discuss): The entities George Washington and General of the Armies of the United States should be contemporary to be linked through military rank, but the latest end value of George Washington is 14 December 1799 Gregorian and the earliest start value of General of the Armies of the United States is 3 September 1919 Gregorian". Is there a way to not have the contemporary constraint by stating that he was posthumously promoted to General of the Armies of the U.S. (AKA six-star general)? More references/non-primary references which also state that George Washington=6-star general:

I disagree with the edit of UserːNurni. Commanding General of the United States Army (Q1115127) is more a position held (P39) than a military rank (P410). The use of the latter will triggle a constrainst violation given of its instance of (P31) value. It seems that the interpretation of User:Giftzwerg 88 here is pertinent in this case. What do you think about that? Louperivois (talk) 15:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

中國國家圖書館系統號的數據好像有問題,(001822789)目前頁面顯示為「主题 - 营养效应」(000106820),這讓我一度以爲搞錯了。

以作品檢索回到「Washington, George, 1732-1799」,顯示ID的確是(001822789)--Nostalgiacn (talk) 14:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

exact dates needed![edit]

he did not serve 8 years! Dacorrectorda (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wrong birthplace[edit]

he was born in Westmoreland County, VA, not Westmoreland County, PA.

71.116.60.38 19:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a 2nd erroneous birthplace listed on Feb 18 2023, Wakefield (Q216638) city in West Yorkshire, England