Talk:Q207981

Moved Site-links to Q4384067

Many of the site-links here do not refer to just the video game but to the whole franchise. Therefore, Q4384067 is the proper place for those links. I moved some of the links, not sure about articles in certain languages though. --Danwe (talk) 00:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Video game or TV Series?

In English the description says this item is about the video game, in German it says it is about the television series. The English one was added first, so I guess that one should prevail? There should probably be further items for TV series, Manga etc. --Danwe (talk) 01:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

guys, you did something quite wrong

@Danwe, What here area team:

I see that you guys wanna split "Code Geass" (the whole franchise series) and "Code Geass: Lelouch of Rebellion". However, this needs to be done based on the content of these articles on each WP. Indeed, ja:コードギアス is the whole franchise; but is en:Code Geass about the whole franchise? I bet most of the articles on this item is not---I really don't think articles in other languages will write "Code Geass" about the franchise, simply because the TV anime is what the word is well-known about. Thus, by doing so, you guys have splitted up de, it, pt, zh, and several other articles to an isolated item.

Based on the situation of zh and en, which I know the best and can tell by reading, my suggestion is, to make ja:コードギアス the "minority" item; meanwhile I'll create a disambig using "Code Geass" namespace, on enwiki and zhwiki, so that the interwiki network is complete and thorough. -- SzMithrandir (talk) 01:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

A quick list, just to see what's going on

Q207981 ar be cs da en es fa fr gl he hi id ja* kab ko* lt nm nl no pl pt* ru sh simple sv uk vi

Q4384067 de it ja ko nn pt th tl tr zh

So the starred(*) ones are potentially those really referring to the franchise. -- So there're only three, ja, ko, and pt.

And now, what I'll do is, separate the three real ones to another item, and then merge the Q4.. ones back to Q2.. ---- or, I could maintain the current items (just these two, without adding any), and do a collective moving at a much slightly larger number, from Q2.. to Q4..

I will do as the lalter. That why I don't need to change the statement and genres and actors, etc of the item. Q2 -[14 items]-> Q4, as opposed to Q4 -[10 items]-> Q2; so pretty close. -- SzMithrandir (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)