Talk:Q12547192
Autodescription — past imperfect (Q12547192)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “past imperfect” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
past imperfect⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Mix-up[edit]
Hi,
With @Hsarrazin: we stumble upon this item that seems to mix several different concepts: at least the imperfect (in general, close to imperfective (Q371427)) and the indicative imperfect (a specific tense, but there is other imperfect tense, qv. imperfect subjunctive (Q3502541) for instance). I'm not sure how to untangle this but something should be done (in particular to be used on Lexemes but also on other items like imperfect subjunctive (Q3502541) which is not in the indicative but has subclass of this item who is indicative :/ ).
I guess, the easiest solution would be to turn this item in the general concept and create a new item for "indicative imperfect" where we should move most of the data and some wikipedia sitelink (but which one, not all articles have a clear scope)
@Andreasmperu, Infovarius, Ederporto: what do you think?
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)