Talk:Q10648343
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — duo (Q10648343)
description: two individuals who work together
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “duo” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- duo (Q10648343)
- team (Q327245)
- dyad (Q2700595)
- →(#) group of humans (Q16334295)
- duo (Q10648343)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
duo⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
+duos? --Fractaler (talk) 13:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
@Moebeus: probably the merge was wrong - not every group of 2 people is working together (e.g. Q3046146) and Q15618652 was about general "group of 2 people". --Infovarius (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Definitely wrong --Horcrux (talk) 10:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Infovarius: In that case, feel free to revert me. I merged these two because the only thing that seemed to block them were the two articles about radarpar - radarpar being an older, humorous term/synonym for a duo in Swedish and Norwegian, but not a word we would necessarily use instead of "duo". Also, there was some confusion with Spanish and French using duo for both a musical duo and a duet that I was looking to clarify. I apologize for any problems caused. EDIT: Shouldn't dyad cover "group of 2 people" pretty exactly? Moebeus (talk) 11:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- I don't care about a label in one language, I look at tens of descriptions and statements. Q2700595 looks closer to general thought it contains characteristics "social". I am not sure, it "non-social" group of 2 is possible. --Infovarius (talk) 18:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)