Property talk:P457

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• List of values
• List of qualifiers
• Count

foundational text
text through which an institution or object has been created or established

Description	text that gave rise to an organization
Represents	articles of association (Q3497659), Constitutional document (Q680655), constitutive treaty (Q116741026)
Data type	Item
Domain	organizations, administrative units possibly others (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
Allowed values	legal documents (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
Example	Canada (Q16) → Constitution Act, 1867 (Q868884) Federal Reserve System (Q53536) → Federal Reserve Act (Q2982567)
Tracking: usage	Category:Pages using Wikidata property P457 (Q73000477)
See also	main regulatory text (P92), laws applied (P3014), consequence of text (P9680), charter URL (P6378)
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties By value of property Most statements Fewest statements Most sitelinks Most linked wikis Total of sitelinks on items Most identifiers Fewest identifiers Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Chart by item creation date Database reports/Constraint violations/P457 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 51,793 Main statement 51,711 99.8% of uses Qualifier 56 0.1% of uses Reference 26 <0.1% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Value type “document (Q49848), decree (Q2571972), administrative act (Q1058236), statute (Q820655), charter (Q727002), legal act (Q1864008), contract (Q93288), treaty (Q131569), conventional amendment (Q23001715), scholarly work (Q55915575)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31), subclass of (P279) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value document (Q49848), decree (Q2571972), administrative act (Q1058236), statute (Q820655), charter (Q727002), legal act (Q1864008), contract (Q93288), treaty (Q131569), conventional amendment (Q23001715), scholarly work (Q55915575) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P457#Value type Q49848, Q2571972, Q1058236, Q820655, Q727002, Q1864008, Q93288, Q131569, Q23001715, Q55915575, SPARQL

Qualifiers “section, verse, paragraph, or clause (P958), subject has role (P2868), object has role (P3831), sourcing circumstances (P1480), amended by (P2567), point in time (P585), reason for deprecated rank (P2241), reason for preferred rank (P7452), series ordinal (P1545), language of work or name (P407), author (P50), author name string (P2093), title (P1476), publisher (P123), editor (P98), place of publication (P291), part of the series (P179), issue (P433), page(s) (P304), number of pages (P1104), published in (P1433), publication date (P577), full work available at URL (P953)”: this property should be used only with the listed qualifiers. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P457#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL

Property “full work available at URL (P953)” declared by target items of “foundational text (P457)”: If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “full work available at URL (P953)”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P457#Target required claim P953, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P457#Entity types

Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P457#Scope, SPARQL

This property is being used by: cs:Šablona:Infobox - vláda ca:Plantilla:Infotaula d'organització, ca:Plantilla:Proves organització, ca:Plantilla:Infotaula geografia política/proves, ca:Plantilla:Infotaula organització uk:Шаблон:Картка організації, uk:Шаблон:Картка:Організація, uk:Шаблон:Картка:Організація/пісочниця fa:الگو:Infotaula d'organització/آزمایشی vec:Modeło:Infobox de Organizasion ga:Teimpléad:WD Bosca Sonraí Eagraíochta gv:Clowan:WD Kishtey Fys Reagheydys id:Templat:Uji coba kotak info Wikidata, id:Templat:Kotak info organisasi 2 hy:Կաղապար:Տեղեկաքարտ Կրոն Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

== Subproperty of has cause?

Constitution

Do statements like France (Q142)foundational text (P457)Constitution of France (Q832508)point in time (P585)'1958 make sense ? I don't think it does as France, as described in France (Q142) existed before that time, but since the statement has been added by Laketown (talk • contribs • logs) almost two months ago [1] and has not been reverted yet, I thought I would ask for second opinions. --Zolo (talk) 14:52, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

@zolo: Maybe use 'applies to part' to clarify? Arlo Barnes (talk) 21:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)