Wikidata:WikidataCon 2017/Submissions/How to tackle the Global South systemic bias

From Wikidata
Jump to: navigation, search

Pictogram voting info.svg This is an Open submission for WikidataCon 2017 that has not yet been reviewed by the members of the Program Committee.

Submission no. 29
Title of the submission

How to tackle the Global South systemic bias


Author(s) of the submission

Andreasmperu

E-mail address

andreasmperu at gmail.com

Country of origin

Peru

Affiliation, if any (organisation, company etc.)

Type of session

Discussion

Length of session

30 minutes

Ideal number of attendees

More than 5

EtherPad for documentation
https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/How_to_tackle_the_Global_South_systemic_bias

Abstract

Most Wikidata editors come from developed countries, and most data is gathered in developed countries. Therefore, it was expectable for Wikidata to contain less data related to the Global South (Q1149903). As time goes by, the gap seems to keep growing, which would be causing a systemic bias on Wikidata. So the first question would be how to measure this gap: is it possible to have an idea of how big the problem is right now? And then, what tools do we currently have to address this problem?

A big issue could be the lower amount of data available for developing countries, in which case Wikidata cannot actually rely on third parties to gather the data. And even if data was existent, it could not be available online or even not digitised, so partnerships would have to be established (assuming data donations are not possible because of lack of funds). A feasible solution would be to engage more editors from developing countries, but what would be the best course of action to achieve that?

What will attendees take away from this session?
  1. Awareness of an existing problem
  2. Ideas for a plan of action
Slides or further information
Special requests

Interested attendees[edit]

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest.

  1. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 08:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
  2. Andrawaag (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
  3. —M@sssly 10:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)