Wikidata:Requests for comment/Restructuring of the "minor" user rights

From Wikidata
Jump to: navigation, search
An editor has requested the community to provide input on "Restructuring of the "minor" user rights" via the Requests for comment (RFC) process. This is the discussion page regarding the issue.

If you have an opinion regarding this issue, feel free to comment below. Thank you!

Proposal 10: abusefilter-log-private for rollbackers[edit]

Can we add abusefilter-log-private for rollbackers? zhwiki is already done.--GZWDer (talk) 04:02, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Support proposal 10[edit]

  1. --GZWDer (talk) 04:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  2. Also here my opinion hasn't changed since the last discussion. Vogone talk 11:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  3. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  4. Sure. --Base (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
  5. Glaisher [talk] 15:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  6. GA candidate.svg Weak support However, this is useless without abusefilter-view-private rights (prop. 6). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Oppose proposal 10[edit]

  1. Why? --Rschen7754 04:09, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  2. I think this is not nessesary.... and proposer didn't provided much,resonable reason, I think. --by ReviDiscussSUL Info at 04:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
    rollbackers can use it to anti-vandalism. discussion in zhwiki.--GZWDer (talk) 04:22, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
    As I know, there is not much antivandalism work on Wikidata,so that is not necessary. --by ReviDiscussSUL Info at 04:26, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  3. per Revi --DangSunM (talk) 13:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
  4. not needed, at least at the moment. -- Bene* talk 21:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see why rollbackers need that info. The Anonymouse (talk) 07:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposal 11: make a user right to override Spamblacklist[edit]

I think sometimes we needs to add links which is banned in m:Spam_blacklist or MediaWiki:Spamblacklist (current none), such as in TinyURL (Q1196499) and so on. We can add it to autopatrolled/rollback/PC group or create a new user group.--GZWDer (talk) 10:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Support proposal 11[edit]

Oppose proposal 11[edit]

  1. No, we should not add blacklisted links to items that can be transcluded into the pages of WP etc. Instead, we should finetune the blacklisting made on meta. -- Lavallen (talk) 15:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
  2. I think Lavallen is right here. Vogone talk 15:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
  3. using such links may cause problems then. --Base (talk) 15:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
  4. --DangSunM (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  5. No need.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  6. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Better than going around blacklists is better managing such listing. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:07, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  7. Could cause some chaos. -- Bene* talk 18:07, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  8. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not necessary. The Anonymouse (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.