Wikidata:Property proposal/période synodique
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
synodic period[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Space
| Description | Translated definition from the Wikipedia in French: "The synodic period of a planet is the time taken by this planet to return to the same Earth-planet-Sun configuration." |
|---|---|
| Represents | synodic period (Q3411977) |
| Data type | Point in time |
| Template parameter | « période synodique » within fr:Modèle:Infobox Planète |
| Domain | celestial bodies orbiting about a bigger one (usually stars) |
| Allowed values | numbers |
| Allowed units | hours, days, years |
| Example | Saturn (Q193) → 378.0944 days |
| Format and edit filter validation | "month" and "century" can't be used |
| Planned use | This property is going to be used inside fr:Modèle:Infobox Astre ("astre" means "celestial body" in French", the planned replacement for fr:Modèle:Infobox Planète, fr:Modèle:Infobox Exoplanète, and other infobox models related to celestial bodies. The creation of this new infobox is coordinated on the local Astronomy wikiproject. |
- Motivation
We're creating for fr:Projet:Astronomie a replacement in Lua for the bunch of infoboxes that already existed on the Wikipedia in French about celestial bodies and that are hard to maintain and not linked to Wikidata. We already successfully created last year a replacement for our former planetary geography infobox like this, but the Wikidata properties were already available back then. J. N. Squire (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support you should maybe add orbital period (P2146) as a "see also" (related but different). Also I believe the domain should only include planets (and smaller bodies) within our solar system - the definition makes no sense for extra-solar planets. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)- Support --Pasleim (talk) 16:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- @J. N. Squire, Pasleim:
Done I'm not sure the French and English description agree, can you check that on the property now? ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:59, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- @J. N. Squire, ArthurPSmith, Pasleim: I've adjusted the descriptions so they can fit any orbiting object, according to the various definitions I've read of it on various sources. Does it look understandable for you, people? J. N. Squire (talk) 13:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
