Wikidata:Property proposal/number of articles

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

number of articles[edit]

Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Under discussion
DescriptionHow many articles a Wikipedia language edition has
Data typeNumber (not available yet)
Example 1English Wikipedia (Q328) → 5,782,014
Example 2French Wikipedia (Q8447) → 2,070,417
Example 3MISSING
Sourcesome Wikipedia or meta

Motivation[edit]

(I am sorry, I can speak English a little bit)

Lot of Wiki have old data. This qualifier help in the future, that the data is always up to date. B.Zsolt (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support David (talk) 06:52, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment for the last discussion see Wikidata:Property proposal/Number of articles. --Pasleim (talk) 09:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, I disagree with Andyhas parts of the class (P2670) is not flexible enough for this kind of data. For example, a statement can be qualified further with date, which is a very important part of data. (Qualifying the has parts of the class (P2670) statement with the date is semantically incorrect: it means that at that point, this Wikipedia contained articles; it may contain kittens or countries or anything else tomorrow.) Actually the properties mentioned there are (except for number of households (P1538)) static values, which don’t change over time, so a qualifier is more sufficient for them than for Wikipedia articles. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 21:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
    • Re semantic accuracy: I don't think that's correct. Date qualifiers qualify the whole statement including other qualifiers. --Yair rand (talk) 03:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Palotabarát (talk) 11:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Why not use number of pages (P1104)? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Is it necessary to have this information 'statically' in Wikidata? Isn't an information available via the API? (I wonder if someone will update this information frequently how it would affect the history of the object) --Sabas88 (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think the arguments in the previous discussion have been addressed. ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per previous discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
  • When re-proposing a property, please ping participants of prior discussions. Doing so now: @Mikey641, 1Or, ביקורת, Swpb, Vladimir Alexiev, Marsupium:. --Yair rand (talk) 03:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. --Yair rand (talk) 03:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Changes to fast. Would only make sense if there would be a way to get the data from the API in to the property value without a bot. --GPSLeo (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2019 (UTC)