Wikidata:Property proposal/masculine form
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
masculine form of lexeme[edit]
Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes
Under discussion
| Description | lexeme that is the masculine form of the subject lexeme |
|---|---|
| Represents | masculine (Q499327) |
| Data type | Lexeme |
| Domain | lexeme |
| Example 1 | queen (L1380) → king (L9670) |
| Example 2 | actrice (L12849) → acteur (L13374) |
| Example 3 | madre (L47362) → padre (L221496) |
| Example 4 | lioness (L43104) → lion (L17815) |
| Planned use | to be used where it doesn't make sense to add the masculine form as a Form to the subject Lexeme, but instead is considered to be a separate Lexeme |
| See also | female form of label (P2521), male form of label (P3321) |
Motivation[edit]
Currently there is no single way to do this. Theklan (talk) 13:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Comment are there some examples in other languages where this would apply? Definitely a few more examples would help clarify how this ought to be structured. For example should it apply at the lexeme level, or senses? Perhaps it ought to be a symmetric property that links in both directions (opposite gender form?) ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- There is a symmetry property proposal: Wikidata:Property proposal/feminine form. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Comment are there some examples in other languages where this would apply? Definitely a few more examples would help clarify how this ought to be structured. For example should it apply at the lexeme level, or senses? Perhaps it ought to be a symmetric property that links in both directions (opposite gender form?) 
