Wikidata:Property proposal/hyponym

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

hyponym[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Lexemes

   On hold
Descriptionword whose meaning is included in this one
Representshyponym (linguistics) (Q680042)
Data typewikibase-lexeme-sense-invalid datatype (not in Module:i18n/datatype)
Allowed valuesSenses
Examplehorse (en) → pony (en)
See alsoWikidata:Property proposal/hyperonym

Tubezlob (🙋) 15:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Discussion

  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose - We should handle these logical relations between concepts in item space rather than Lexeme space. See my comment above. Deryck Chan (talk) 09:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: I don't think we'll have items for every word sense. --Denny (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Different language handle concepts a bit differently and as a result it can be useful to specifically link words within a given language. ChristianKl❫ 17:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support While I oppose the #meronym relation, since I believe it is better modeled as a part-of relation between items, I support this one, since there can be subtle differences between the translations of a sense, which can be made explicit using the hyponym relationship (among other things). I agree with Denny that this relationship is useful for senses for which we don't have items, while I don't see how the meronym relationship would be useful for senses that do not denote items. -- Duesentrieb (talk) 11:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Marked as on hold pending new data type. Dhx1 (talk) 12:46, 25 May 2018 (UTC)