Wikidata:Property proposal/day number within month

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

day number within month[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Event

   Not done
Data typeQuantity
Domaincalendar months. Not items for specific dates such as 12 January 2018 (Q45919572)
Allowed values1-32 0-31
Allowed unitsnone
See alsomonth of the year (P2922), day of week (P2894), point in time (P585), series ordinal (P1545), no label (P2837)

Integer datatype isn't available so quantity is being used. point in time (P585) doesn't allow partial dates, series ordinal (P1545) is generally used as a qualifier and has string datatype.
--- Jura 12:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

  • @J 1982, Romaine, Mahir256, Mr. Ibrahem, JAn Dudík, ‎Wadorgurt: @‎Tacsipacsi, ‎J budissin, WylveWidar: please comment, as you frequently edit day items.
    --- Jura 12:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
    • @Jura1: I just fixed some Hungarian labels in the past days, otherwise I don’t edit them often. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 15:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose use qualifier series ordinal (P1545). Just wondering, which item would use the value 32? --Pasleim (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
    • Good question. We only got "February 31" and "March 0". Maybe we should have "36ème du mois". I adjusted the range, but it could be fine tuned later.
      --- Jura 07:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I can get behind the use of this proposed property, since unlike P2837 it isn't restricted to the Gregorian calendar, but this seems way too similar in spirit to no label (P2837) for that property to be left out of the conversation: as such @ArthurPSmith, ChristianKl, Liuxinyu970226, Deryck Chan, Manu1400: for completeness of opinions, given that they argued for or against the deletion of P2837. Mahir256 (talk) 21:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is not a useful addition David (talk) 14:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I can see there might be some purpose to this but I'd like to see a practical example shown for how it would potentially be used. Maybe String datatype would be fine. Or maybe an Item datatype would be better. I don't quite see how series ordinal (P1545) would work as a substitute property for this relationship so maybe somebody can clarify how they see that working too. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

 Not done No consensus. Micru (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)