Wikidata:Property proposal/Scilit journal ID

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Scilit journal ID[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

DescriptionID of a journal in Scilit (scientific literature) by MDPI (Q6715186)
Data typeExternal identifier
Allowed values[1-9]\d{0,8}
Example 1Systematic & Applied Acarology (Q7663757)1028274
Example 2Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia (Q2533747)307604
Example 3International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management (Q15816386)687103
Example 4International Journal of Medical Microbiology (Q6051476)2137900
External linksUse in sister projects: [ar][de][en][es][fr][he][it][ja][ko][nl][pl][pt][ru][sv][vi][zh][commons][species][wd].
Number of IDs in source70904 (27.11.2019)
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL$1


Launched on 25 May 2018. GZWDer (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @GZWDer: Please make the examples links.Thank you David (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't think there is a lot of Item that will benefit from this property (<100). —Eihel (talk) 23:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
    @Eihel: Why? The proposal states there are over 70,000 ids. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:37, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
    @ArthurPSmith: I am not an aficionado of Mix'n'match, but you can find your reply here. That's why I put a comment instead of an opinion. The number of entries of the site doesn't correspond to my comment. By the way, it's my modification that gives you 70904 (instead of 2900000!?) with a reference in the "source" field. The important thing in my comment is the Items that can benefit from an identifier of this future property. Hence the term "<100" which defines the creation or not of a property. This is also an observation from external links on other projects. Tell me if I'm wrong. —Eihel (talk) 12:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
    @Eihel: I don't understand your meaning for "can benefit". If there are 70,000+ journals listed in the source, then very likely most of them have Wikidata items, and perhaps all of them should, so certainly 10's of thousands of items could have this identifier applied. That's our usual criterion. Are you expecting something more when you say "can benefit"? ArthurPSmith (talk) 12:56, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
    I reply my own comment: it seems, after a quick look at M'n'm, that the number of Items is sufficient. —Eihel (talk) 20:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

@GZWDer, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Nomen ad hoc, Pigsonthewing, ArthurPSmith: ✓ Done Scilit journal ID (P7662)Eihel (talk) 01:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)