Wikidata:Property proposal/Rigging

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

rigging[edit]

Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Transportation

   Under discussion
Descriptiontype of rigging of a sailing boat or ship
Representsno label (Q1634158)
Data typeItem
Template parameter"Ship type" in en:template:Infobox ship characteristics
Domainsailing ship (Q170483), sailboat (Q1075310)
Allowed valuesfull-rigged ship (Q1581130), barque (Q216057), sloop-of-war (Q928235), brigantine (Q189418), cutter (Q683363), Catboat (Q1050011)
Example 1Balclutha (Q804713)full-rigged ship (Q1581130)
Example 2Rickmer Rickmers (Q479965)barque (Q216057)
Example 3Alinghi 5 (Q681813)sloop-of-war (Q928235)
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)

Motivation[edit]

To classify sailing ships or boats MB-one (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

Feel free to add yourself to this list. User:Danrok Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) Rama Christian Ferrer Nortix08 Andrawaag


Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject Ships

Is there a general principle to guide whether it's better to have finer-grained properties, or finer-grained classes and subclasses? A similar question has come up at Project chat#Items for multi-intersection. Scs (talk) 12:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cwf97 (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2019 (EST)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the values proposed for this property are all "types of ship", which should be used with instance of (P31) (and mostly are, for the given examples). If there were items for the "rigging" itself that was somehow independent of ship type maybe this would make sense, but "ship type" and "rigging", at least for sailing ships, seem to be closely tied so I don't think there is a case for this property at all right now. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:45, 20 June 2019 (UTC)