Wikidata:Property proposal/Gry Online game ID

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gry-Online game ID[edit]

Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

   Under discussion
Descriptionidentifier of a video game in the Gry-Online database
RepresentsGry Online (Q55613038)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainvideo game (Q7889)
Allowed values[1-9]\d*
Example 1Crash Time 4: The Syndicate (Q2636956)1
Example 2Syphon Filter: Dark Mirror (Q2291549)10
Example 3BioShock 2: Minerva's Den (Q24806656)1424
Example 4StarCraft: Brood War (Q840409)6680
Example 5Ministry of Broadcast (Q84165734)22901
Sourcehttps://www.gry-online.pl/gry/
External linksUse in sister projects: [ar][de][en][es][fr][he][it][ja][ko][nl][pl][pt][ru][sv][vi][zh][commons][species][wd].
Number of IDs in source22942
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
Formatter URLhttps://www.gry-online.pl/gra.asp?ID=$1 ; https://gamepressure.com/game.asp?ID=$1

Motivation[edit]

Gry Online (Q55613038) is a Polish website and online database of ~30K video games. It has two websites: the Polish gry-online.pl, and the English gamepressure.com − the ID system is shared between the two (hence two formatter URL). Significant usage on the Polish Wikipedia (with gry-online), quite some on English Wikipedia and a couple of others. Jean-Fred (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

ΛΧΣ21 Vacation9 John F. Lewis (talk) Bene* talk #Reaper (talk) Josve05a (talk) Chris Mason (talk) FunPika Arthena (talk) Wangxuan8331800 (talk) Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) Nicereddy (talk) Syum90 (talk) DrakeCaiman (talk) --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) Andreasburmeister (talk) Danrok (talk) 18:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Macrike (talk) Dispenser (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC) --Zache (talk) 13:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Mohammed Adam (T) SharkD  Talk  06:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC) ZebaX2010 (talk) 00:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC) Sight Contamination (talk) Lewis Hulbert (talk) 20:26, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Jean-Fred (talk) 10:48, 28 February 2018 (UTC) Santer (talk) Cloaker416 (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC) Rampagingcarrot (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Diggr (talk) 08:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC) Harsh Rathod Poke me! 09:42, 7 July 2018 (UTC) Kirilloparma (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC) Sir Lothar (talk) 10:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC) Cwf97 (talk) 14:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC) Esteban16 (talk) 00:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC) Peterchanws Brasig Le Yota de Mars YotaMoteuchi (talk) 08:09, 22 May 2019 (UTC) Coloradohusky CptViraj BugWarp ʂɤɲ User:Nw520 Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject Video games

Discussion[edit]

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It need title in the url otherwise it linking to the most interesting materials instead of game page. See Eurohunter (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like Eurohunter wrote - it should be string datatype. Sir Lothar (talk) 13:51, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
    If the proposal is already in “Ready”, please change-it back to not ready if you are going to make significant changes to the proposal.
    I disagree, because crash-time-iv-the-syndicate/z11 is clearly not an Identifier but a slug (which have a habit to not be very stable). The numeric IDs are likely to be way more stable. If it’s just a formatter URL ; then let’s use the gamepressure one which resolves cleanly to the “more interesting material”. (see eg https://gamepressure.com/game.asp?ID=1) Jean-Fred (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
  • @Eurohunter, Sir Lothar: That's very uncool to radically change a proposed identifier like that without even pinging the proposer. I agree with Jean-Fred, if this is an ID then a numeric ID is much preferable. I Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (struck since this was changed back again, thanks) the current modified version of this proposal. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:31, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
    • @ArthurPSmith, Jean-Frédéric: Sorry, I thought that if the discussion is still going on, then user can modify proposal (like "Be bold" on Wikipedia). My mistake - I'll remember that next time. I still think that it's better to send reader to the main site of entity (like [1]), rather than to side materials. Sir Lothar (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2020 (UTC)