Wikidata:Property proposal/Google plus

From Wikidata
Jump to: navigation, search

Google+[edit]

   Done. Google+ ID (P2847) (Talk and documentation)
Data type External identifier
Domain people, organizations, other
Allowed values \d{22}|\+[-\w_\u00C0-\u00FF]+ (64-bit int base10 encoded and vanity URL)
Example Ubuntu (Q381) -> +Ubuntu
Michael Bloomberg (Q607) -> 10055787708941310856
Mitt Romney (Q4496) -> +MittRomney
see User:Nikki/P553#Google+ for current uses
For Wikivoyage:
< Komische Oper Berlin (Q687694) View with Reasonator View with SQID > googleplus search < 102309912006062068078 >
in de:Berlin would point to https://plus.google.com/102309912006062068078/
Source website account on (P553) statements
Formatter URL https://plus.google.com/$1
Proposed by Jura 09:51, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Discussion
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question @Jura1: How will this data be imported? Give properties that could be filled in using this external resource. Why are both a numerical ID (used by Google APIs) and the vanity URL allowed values? Considering most of its users were coerced into creating an account and subsequently forgot, how can we be assured the information is meant to be public? Dispenser (talk) 20:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Have a look at Nikki's list.
      --- Jura 23:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No example; conflicting allowed values. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support Both number ID as well as strings like +Ubuntu are valid identifiers, so I don't see conflicting allowed values. All allowed values point to Google plus pages via the formatter URL.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, widely used social network. We should prefer vanity URLs if an item has one, otherwise use the internal ID. This can be documented. --Srittau (talk) 18:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  • I'd Symbol support vote.svg Support giving this the same treatment as Twitter username (P2002) and Facebook profile ID (P2013) because it's just more of the same. K7L (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

@Jura1, K7L: ✓ Done, points by Andy have been addressed. --Srittau (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)