Wikidata:Property proposal/Amino community ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amino community ID[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Not done
| Description | name of the Amino community associated to this subject |
|---|---|
| Represents | Amino community (Q80002220) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | Amino (Q64221183) |
| Example |
|
| Source | https://aminoapps.com/ |
| Number of IDs in source | more than 2.500.000 |
| Formatter URL | https://aminoapps.com/c/$1/home/ |
| See also | subreddit (P3984) |
--Trade (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Comment I have many doubts about the correct values for items: Why should we use "dogs" instead of "DogsPlus" for dog (Q144)? And The Walt Disney Company (Q7414) should use "disney", "DisneyAmino101", or "DisneyxAmino"? Another thing: I think the correct datatype should be "item". It would be useful for add statements about the communities, like number of subscribers (P3744). --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 22:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @Tinker Bell:, who's to say that you can't place both "dogs" and "DogsPlus". This is no different than subreddit (P3984)--Trade (talk) 22:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Mmm, I don't like how subreddit (P3984) is used, because I tend to think they aren't identifiers per se, but works that can have their own item, and can link their topic using main subject (P921). Anyway,
Weak support. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 23:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- Mmm, I don't like how subreddit (P3984) is used, because I tend to think they aren't identifiers per se, but works that can have their own item, and can link their topic using main subject (P921). Anyway,
Oppose no motivation was provided in the proposal. Putting a statement on millions of items has a cost, and given that I haven't heard of Amino before I doubt that cost is worth it. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 14:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: It's one of the most used mobile social media networking apps currently available. Definitely notable.
- Do you have any data for that claim? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per ChristianKl and Tinker Bell, no clear motivation or benefit and unclear mapping. Also the app seems to be quite new (2014) and this would add a lot of bloat with little benefit. --Hannes Röst (talk) 02:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Marked as "not done", due to lack of support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)