Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

Administrators' noticeboard

This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention.

• If you wish for something to be deleted, please use Wikidata:Requests for deletions.
• If you want to report a bug in Wikidata software, please use Wikidata:Report a technical problem or Phabricator.
• Matters not requiring administrator action should be raised at Project chat.
• Matters that may involve CheckUser should be raised at Wikidata:Requests for checkuser.
• To report vandalism on Wikidata, please click here.
• Please add {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} to resolved sections.

IRC channel: #wikidata^connect

Translate this header box!

Start a new discussion

On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2026/09.

On this page all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose oldest comment is older than 7 days are automatically archived.

Requests for deletions

high

_{~135 open requests for deletions.}

Requests for unblock

empty

_{~0 open requests for unblock.}

Report concerning Shovgu

Shovgu does not seem to understand the difference between "mother/native language" vs "official language" as seen here [1] [2].

This is just one issue, I could also get into the fact that they ignore (whether on purpose or due to language barrier) sources/information that contradicts their opinion [3], hopefully that is not going to be necessary. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

You are not stopping the edit war. What do you hope to achieve by reverting my edit that linked Wikipedia to Wikidata? https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q161205&diff=prev&oldid=2527289359 Shovgu (talk) 22:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

And now they're edit warring again, at Afsharid dynasty [4], completely ignoring what the English article of the Wikidata says ("was an Iranian[1] dynasty founded by Nader Shah (r. 1736–1747) of the Qirqlu clan of the Turkoman Afshar tribe, ruling over Afsharid Iran.[1][2]") and the dozens of sources I listed at their talk page. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I am not discussing whether the Afshars were an Iranian dynasty. I am discussing the language of the dynasty. What are you talking about? Shovgu (talk) 22:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Yes, we can all see that. Your addition is roughly translated to "A Turkic dynasty that ruled in Azerbaijan and Iran in the 18th century", which contradicts what sources and the article itself says. Azerbaijan didn't exist back then either [5] [6] [7], as you were also told, but ignore as well. Which is as I said, you ignore sources/information that contradicts your opinion. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

As I have explained to you, you are bringing up unrelated topics. "Azerbaijan" is a historical geographical name, and the people we call Azerbaijanis today are one of the Turkic peoples. You are presenting me with sources that contradict claims I never made. Shovgu (talk) 22:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I say "the Turkic dynasty that ruled Iran"—do you understand? Shovgu (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

This is hopeless... the language barrier is too big of an issue, as also seen on their talk page. Can an admin please help? HistoryofIran (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Sources regarding the fact that the native language of the dynasties (not the state) was Turkic:

Sources for the Safavid Dynasty

"The Role of Azerbaijani Turkish in Safavid Iran", Iranian Studies, Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2013, pp. 569-581.

"The Poetry of Shah Ismail I", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1942, pp. 1006a-1053a.

"Shah Abbas: The Ruthless King Who Became an Iranian Legend", I.B. Tauris, 2009, p. 165.

"Iran Under the Safavids", Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 213.

Sources for the Afsharid Dynasty

"The Sword of Persia: Nader Shah, from Tribal Warrior to Conquering Tyrant", I.B. Tauris, 2006, pp. 17-19, 34.

"Nadir Shah's Quest for Legitimacy in Post-Safavid Iran", University Press of Florida, 2006.

"Frontier Nomads of Iran: A Political and Social History of the Shahsevan", Cambridge University Press, 1997. Shovgu (talk) 22:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Besides you proving that you still don't understand the difference between "native language" and "official language", it seems you don't understand what "dynasty" means either. Speaking x language does not make you x dynasty, as seen in the listed sources. Matter of the fact is you're ignoring sources/information that you don't like. Also, your citations has no quotes and some has dozens of pages or no pages, no one wants to go on a treasure hunt to find the quotes for you, which I doubt you even have yourself. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I have moved the Turkic language from the "official language" section to the "native language" section. It will remain this way until the discussion concludes. I maintain the position that Turkic was also the official language of the dynasty. I believe Turkic should be included in both sections because it was the language of the Turkic dynasty—rather than the state itself—and was used within the court and the dynasty. Shovgu (talk) 22:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

You still refuse to learn what "official language" means, conflating it with other words despite being told about it a dozens of times now, and having had hours to look it up on a simple Google search. You're still engaging in synthesis of published material, i.e. WP:SYNTH. But thanks for removing it from "official language", still, that doesn't fix the issues of your conduct, including at the Afsharid dynasty. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

You are biased. Put aside your own views. Do not hesitate to accept the truth. I am aware of the distinction between a native language and an official language. Given that it was a Turkic dynasty, we agree that their native language was Turkic. However, despite numerous official sources, you refuse to acknowledge that Turkic was also the dynasty's official language, and instead, you present me with sources irrelevant to the topic. Turkic was the dynasty's official language because it was used within the palace, among dynasty members, and in official correspondence—not to mention its use in diplomacy and the military. Persian may have been the state's official language—serving as the international language of that era—but that is irrelevant to our discussion; for instance, the Seljuk Empire was a Turkic empire, yet the state's official language was Persian. You do not want to accept this. Shovgu (talk) 23:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

There are zero reliable sources that mention it being an official language, including in the English Wikipedia of the very subject. Even when you listed the alleged sources here you said it was about "native language of the dynasties". The only one biased is you, as you refuse to listen to reliable sources and only listen to your personal opinion and WP:SYNTH. There are clearly severe WP:CIR issues here. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Let us continue the discussion once you learn to distinguish between the state and the dynasty. A dynasty is not a state for which a document is signed and an official language is designated; rather, a dynasty uses the Turkic language while governing the state. Consider this aspect: "the language of the dynasty." This is documented everywhere, including on the English Wikipedia. If Turkic were merely the dynasty's native tongue—and if the dynasty did not employ it in state administration, internal court affairs, and official correspondence—then it would suffice to regard Turkic simply as their mother tongue. However, that is not the case. Shovgu (talk) 23:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Again, still failing to understand what official language means and making up stuff as you go, i.e. WP:SYNTH. No point in discussing indeed, hopefully an admin will take a look at your conduct. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

A dynasty's official language is not established by a document. Learn to distinguish between the state and the dynasty. I hope the admins will look into this soon. Shovgu (talk) 00:04, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Whether state or dynasty, "official language" still has one meaning. You are the one who should learn. There is a reason WP:RS has not supported you once, and contradicts you in the dozens. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:06, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

You have no grounds to invoke the WP:RS policy here. There is no such thing as an "official language of a dynasty," as it is not an institution; what we are referring to is the language they actually used. Either you do not understand this, or it simply does not suit your agenda. Shovgu (talk) 00:17, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

If we are referring to the language they spoke, but which wasn't an official language under them, then we don't add it as an "official language", it's that simple really, and I think a part of you know this, which is why you removed it from "official languages" after this report. But I'm done trying to put sense into you after these several hours, I'll let the admins take it from here. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

I don't know who you are referring to when you say "a part of you." I am just a human being. What do you mean when you say "a part of you knows this"? What is it that they know? If you are trying to emphasize that the Turkic language isn't being used, then you are simply engaging in a war of words. Because you are still too biased to admit that the language of the ruling dynasty and the language of the state are distinct. I had intended to keep the situation as it was until the discussion concluded, but I changed my mind. Shovgu (talk) 01:10, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

I had intended to keep the situation as it was until the discussion concluded, but I changed my mind

You did indeed [8]. So in other words, you doubled down on your disruptive conduct. It was also only two months ago that you got blocked for edit warring. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:41, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Shovgu is now engaging in more pov pushing by adding "Azerbaijani" as this figures native language [9], despite them not even speaking that language nor even being of Azerbaijani descent (they were Kipchaks per the sourced English Wikipedia article [10]). --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:55, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

You have also seen the edit where I included the Persian language.1 You are simply highlighting what suits your own agenda. Did you start looking for errors in my edits only after your complaint failed to yield results? Shovgu (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

You have also seen the edit where I included the Persian language

Which I also removed. It seems you don't know what "native language" means either (hell, they he didn't even speak Azerbaiajani, let alone it being his native language). And regardless, it doesn't justify adding "Azerbaijani" (which you're now edit warring to restore, even more disruptive).

You are simply highlighting what suits your own agenda.

Ironic. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Aha, if you acknowledge that his native language is Azerbaijani—and not Persian—then why are you trying to erase the Azerbaijani language? Shovgu (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I didn't even remotely say that. Again proving the huge language barrier is too big of an issue. Also, you're still edit warring, clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

You have just exposed your lie: "You have also seen the edit where I included the Persian language.

Which I also removed. It seems you don't know what "native language" means either" Shovgu (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Sigh... HistoryofIran (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I have fully protected the item to prevent further edit warring.

@Shovgu, HistoryofIran: You are both warned not to edit war and not to use edit summaries to attack other editors. Please take a step back and discuss the underlying content issue in a collaborative way. Assume good faith. Cut out the insults and personal attacks. Bring in third parties. WD:Project chat is a better venue to get third-party input on content issues. Bovlb (talk) 14:34, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

But that's the thing, it's not a dispute. Per this thread, Shovgu is adding information not supported by their sourced English articles nor reliable sources, the most blatant one being adding "Azerbaijani" here [11], not only as a language, but a native language a that (which contradicts [12], this is like if I added "Azerbaijani" to Napoleon). They refuse to understand what "official language" and "native language" means. For all of these things they have had days to prove otherwise, but to no avail. Also, if the article gets protected, shouldn't it also get reverted back to its previous revision? Why should Shovgu get to force his way through edit warring, whereas I stopped? HistoryofIran (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I have already answered that. Stop repeating yourself; you're leading the discussion into a dead end. Shovgu (talk) 14:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Not at all. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Protection does not endorse the version that happened to be current when I protected the item. See m:The Wrong Version. I am not going to adjudicate the underlying content issue by choosing which version to protect.

Calling this a content dispute also does not mean that I consider the two positions equally well supported. Please resolve the content question through discussion, preferably with input from uninvolved editors. Bovlb (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I have requested input from Wikidata:Project chat [13], though despite that I find it hard how to see how it is going to suddenly change the conduct of Shovgu. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

@Bovlb: Unfortunately it has now been archived. What now? HistoryofIran (talk) 23:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Would appreciate an admin looking into this, these are pretty glaring disruptive edits, which Shovgu has somehow gotten away with by edit warring, despite recently being blocked for that. This does not send a good message. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

In need of admin input

Would really appreciate an admin looking into this. --HistoryofIran (talk) 03:32, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

More pov pushing by Shovgu.. [14], this is straight up false [15]. In the English Wikipedia WP:GSAA is made for exactly these type of users. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:29, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

It is ridiculous for you to be monitoring me throughout the day :) I see no error in my edit; I simply added information that is already on Wikipedia—feel free to make additions yourself. . D Shovgu (talk) 21:24, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

It is ridiculous that you engage in historical falsifications. Clearly not per the diff I linked. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:55, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Bump. --HistoryofIran (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for undeletion: Q139764615

I would like to request reconsideration of the deletion of Q139764615, which was deleted on 8 June 2026 with the summary “RfD: Notability?”.

Disclosure: I am the subject of the item, so I have a conflict of interest. I am therefore limiting this request to providing third-party sources and asking the community to assess whether the item meets Wikidata’s notability criteria.

I am aware that the item was subsequently recreated as Q140782475 and deleted as a recreation of the original item. I understand that recreating the item was not the correct process, so I am requesting undeletion of the original item instead.

I believe the subject may satisfy Wikidata’s N2 criterion because the person can be described using multiple serious and publicly available third-party references.

Some relevant sources are:

Journalism.co.uk — dedicated article/profile covering his previous role at Global and his work in SEO, publishing and audience strategy: https://www.journalism.co.uk/steve-wilson-beales-on-seo-new-metrics-of-success-and-the-zero-click-future/ Music Week — “My Big Break” profile from 2012 covering his career at Universal Music, Ministry of Sound and MSN: https://www.worldradiohistory.com/UK/Music-Week/2012/2012-09-29-Music%20Week.pdf Media Masters — dedicated profile covering his role as Head of SEO & Editorial Product at Global and his professional responsibilities: https://mediamasters.fm/steve-wilson-beales/

Additional independent references include:

Cision UK Media Moves: https://www.cision.co.uk/resources/articles/uk-media-moves-including-global-euromoney-thomson-reuters-foundation-and-more/ Journalism.co.uk coverage of his work at Global/LBC: https://www.journalism.co.uk/user-needs-monologues-and-optimisation-how-lbc-cracked-the-youtube-code/ Association of Online Publishers coverage identifying him as Co-Chair of the Journalism Advisory Board: https://www.ukaop.org/hub/navigating-the-permacrisis-through-quality-journalism

I appreciate that some of these sources include interviews, but taken together they span a long period and independently document the subject’s professional roles and work.

I would be grateful if an administrator could reconsider whether Q139764615 satisfies Wikidata’s notability criterion N2.

I am not requesting creation of a new item, only review of the deletion of Q139764615. Wbsteven123 (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

CC deleting admins @Fralambert, ZI Jony Bovlb (talk) 21:56, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Declined: I have review your request and the given links. Even though you share some references, most of them is just interview, PR or simple job move announcement. This sources are not enough for passing Wikidata notability criteria (N2). Also, the deleted item was look very promotional and you already admit your COI here. Recreating same non-notable promotional item is not correct way. So, this undeletion request is declined. Please do not try to recreate it again in future. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:50, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-47464-81

~2026-47464-81 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. Long-term abuse. Block evasion. LTA. XReport ―نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 09:49, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Follow-up on unanswered undeletion request: Q138745355

My request for undeletion of Q138745355 (Leinhäuser Language Services GmbH), posted on 17 August, appears to have been archived by SpBot on 25 August without receiving a response. I don't want to duplicate the full request here, but would appreciate an administrator reviewing the archived request and the additional sourcing provided there. The original deletion followed an RfD, so I do not want to recreate the item without review. Archived request: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive/2026/08#Request_for_undeletion:_Q138745355_(Leinh%C3%A4user_Language_Services_GmbH) Thank you. Boarder udo (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for undeletion: Q140693224 (Thiabee)

I would like to request a review of the deletion of Q140693224 (Thiabee).

The item was nominated for deletion with the reason "Promotion" and was deleted on 22 August 2026.

Previous discussion: Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2026/08/22#Q140693224

Thiabee is an operating Saudi consumer-to-consumer marketplace for second-hand fashion. The entity is independently listed in third-party business sources, including Fahras, which identifies Thiabee as a Riyadh-based retail business:

https://fahras.biz/en/browse?page=4&section=8%2C2%2C11%2C7%2C16%2C15%2C10%2C3

The official website also provides verifiable information about the marketplace: https://thiabee.com/en

A MAGNiTT company profile has also been established / is being completed.

I understand the concern regarding promotional wording. If the item is restored, it can be kept strictly factual and limited to basic verifiable statements and external identifiers, without marketing language.

Could an administrator please review whether the item can be restored in a neutral form?

Thiabee (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif jupetra

Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif jupetra 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:40, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Request - date of birth

Hello,

I am Maria Anastasopoulou, the living person associated with Wikidata item Q130244365.

I would like to request the removal of the “date of birth” (P569) statement from my Wikidata item. I do not wish my exact date of birth to be displayed or stored as structured personal information on Wikidata.

I attempted to remove the statement myself, but Wikidata returned a “The save has failed” error.

Under Wikidata’s policy regarding living people, I respectfully request that an administrator remove this information from Q130244365.

Thank you for your assistance. Maria Papadopoulos (talk) 21:22, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Courtesy link: Maria Anastasopoulou (Q130244365). Question to fellow admins: per Wikidata:Living people:

If the subject of an item is unhappy with specific information in the item about themselves, they can request the removal of specific information via the Administrators' noticeboard or by emailing privacy@wikidata.org. When the information isn't of public interest, an administrator may revision delete it. Information that's revision deleted is not visible for normal users who visit the history of an item but only visible for our administrators...

I have never addressed a request like this. What is the mechanism for ensuring that this information does not get re-added? Were this a standard WMF wiki with normal content models, I would add an editnotice, but that won't work here. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:06, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

We don't have a good mechanism for this. We could perhaps create an abuse filter or a SPARQL query.

Here are some recent discussions (1, 2, 3, 4), where the responses included: removing the DOB; no response at all; and restoring the DOB, semi-protecting the item, and warning the subject editor against vandalism. Bovlb (talk) 15:41, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Hm. I'll defer to other admins here. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:08, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to hear from the community. Current policy is not at all clear on how we should be handling these cases.

Also, I think the email address above ends up with the m:Volunteer Response Team, but I'm not sure what process they follow. Bovlb (talk) 16:21, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of Q130604188 (David Osipov)

For transparency, I am the subject of the deleted item and therefore have a COI. I am requesting restoration of the original QID rather than recreating it. Especially I would like to notify

There is important new evidence since the previous discussion.

Most importantly, the Biographical Dictionary of Georgia on the National Library of Georgia website has now published a dedicated biographical entry for me:

• David Osipov — Biographical Dictionary of Georgia
• Biographical Dictionary of Georgia ID (P4991) (Biographical Dictionary of Georgia ID): 00026767

The entry contains a biography covering my education, professional work, cybersecurity research and Wikimedia/OpenStreetMap activity. This is relevant to WD:N criterion 2: the person is clearly identifiable and can now be described from a serious publicly available institutional biographical source.

It is also worth noting that Biographical Dictionary of Georgia ID (P4991) is itself classified on Wikidata as an instance of Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316), Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability.

There is also a separate structural-need argument under WD:N criterion 3.

CVE-2026-14440 (Q140402353) (CVE-2026-14440) already exists on Wikidata. Its discoverer or inventor (P61) (discoverer or inventor) currently has to use no value together with qualifiers identifying “David Osipov”, including ORCID and ISNI. The proper model would simply be:

CVE-2026-14440 (Q140402353) → discoverer or inventor (P61) → Q130604188

The official CVE/NVD record explicitly credits David Osipov, independent researcher. I am not arguing that a CVE credit automatically makes a person notable; rather, the existing CVE item demonstrates an actual structural need for the person item.

There is further structural use on Wikimedia Commons: Q130604188 is still reported among deleted Wikidata entities used in Structured Data on Commons. The Commons file commons:File:Birth Certificate for David Zurabovich Osipov. 1993.jpg also has to represent its creator through a surrogate value instead of the deleted person item. That file is now independently reused in the Russian Wiktionary article свидетельство о рождении, where it was added by another editor.

Finally, there was already independent editorial coverage of my OpenStreetMap work in Бумага, in addition to the official CVE attribution and authority identifiers such as ORCID and ISNI.

So this request does not depend on any one weak identifier or on self-published material. There are now two separate grounds under WD:N:

• criterion 2: a new dedicated biographical record in the Biographical Dictionary of Georgia / National Library of Georgia, supplemented by independent and official sources;
• criterion 3: an existing Wikidata item and Wikimedia structured data already require an entity-level representation of the person.

Since WD:N requires meeting at least one criterion, I would appreciate a fresh review of Q130604188 in light of this new evidence. --David Osipov (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Dear @Yamato Shiya , could you pls reevaluate this proposal? David Osipov (talk) 20:37, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

I ask for other uninvolved admins and community members for their opinion.

My consideration:

1. As for involvement in Q140402353, items with Q631425 as value for its P31 does not necessarily needs P61, see this query. If it being used, most of them are attributed to organization.
2. As for the Bibliographical Dictionary entry, as far as my reading to machine translation of it it only paraphrasing the claims you made in your user page, nothing newly notable. It might suggests for inclusion, but does not bind for inclusion, and to the best of my knowledge we do not necessarily mirror every repositories.
3. As for the birth certificate that being used in Commons, I fail to understand how it make the item notable. The usage imply that the file is an example of birth certificate as explained in the Wiktionary page, and not necessarily informing reader about the deleted item.
4. The trade magazine coverage is a good starter, but I think it would need more than one media coverage.

Side note: This is the nth request for undeletion, each requested by the same user, related to the same deleted item. In some instances of repeated requests, some admins warn that repeated request are exhausting community's attention. I could be wrong, thats why I ask uninvolved admins and experienced editors to give their opinion on this. If they see that these new evidences is good enough, they are welcome to undo the deletion. Thank you. Yamato Shiya • (Hello!) 06:21, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you your assessment. I will leave the final assessment to uninvolved admins, but I would like to clarify two points because I think they concern the wording of WD:N itself.

First, criterion 3 does not require that P61 be mandatory or commonly used for every item of the class vulnerability (Q631425). It asks whether the item fulfills a structural need, for example by making a statement in another item more useful. In this specific case, CVE-2026-14440 (Q140402353) already has discoverer or inventor (P61) = no value, supplemented by my name, ORCID, ISNI, given name and family name. Restoring Q130604188 would replace that surrogate representation with the normal item-valued statement. The undeletion guide likewise lists “having a useful in-link from another item” among strong grounds for restoration.

Second, I do not think criterion 2 requires a source to contain a newly notable achievement. Its wording is that the identifiable entity “can be described using serious and publicly available references”. The National Library of Georgia itself describes the Biographical Dictionary as containing biographies of prominent/outstanding Georgians. This is not an automated identifier repository, and Biographical Dictionary of Georgia ID (P4991) is additionally classified by Wikidata as an identifier that suggests notability.

The Paper coverage and official CVE attribution are supplementary to that, not the sole basis of the request.

I also take the point about repeated requests. This request was made because the NPLG biography and the structural use through Q140402353 are genuinely new evidence. I will not repeat the same arguments further and am happy to leave the assessment to uninvolved editors. David Osipov (talk) 07:30, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-47884-26

~2026-47884-26 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. Special:Contributions/Yassin6x XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:46, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Wiederherstellung von Q141259666

Ich bitte um Prüfung der Wiederherstellung des gelöschten Wikidata-Elements Q141259666 („Mika Weiser“).

Das Element wurde am 3. September 2026 mit der Begründung gelöscht, dass es die Notabilitätsrichtlinie nicht erfülle.

Zur Person gibt es mehrere öffentlich zugängliche und unabhängige Veröffentlichungen:

• Lippische Wochenzeitung: „Der Herr der Rotoren kommt aus Lage-Heiden“, 21. Juli 2026
• Lippische Wochenzeitung: „Auftakt zum Lagenser Sommer mit einem Konzert der Band Hirsch.Böcke“, 17. Juli 2026, mit dem Fotocredit „Fotos von Mika Weiser“
• Lippische Wochenzeitung: „Weiß ist Pflicht, Gemütlichkeit Kür beim Dinner in White“, 29. August 2026, mit dem Fotocredit „Foto: Mika Weiser“
• Lippischer Heimatbund: „Wir wollen eigene Ideen verwirklichen – Mika Weiser aus Heiden ist überaus engagiert für seinen Heimatort“, Heimatland Lippe, Ausgabe 02/2026
• Wikimedia Commons: „Die Dorfkirche Heiden lage im Sonnenuntergang.jpg“, eigenes Werk von Mika Weiser

Die genannten Quellen behandeln Mika Weiser beziehungsweise nennen ihn ausdrücklich als Urheber veröffentlichter Fotografien. Ich bitte darum, das gelöschte Element zu prüfen und gegebenenfalls wiederherzustellen.

Lipperländer32 (talk) 15:44, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Relevant items: Q141259666 (Lipperländer32). CC deleting admins @Ziv

It appears that the deleted item was empty. I would normally use "empty item" as the deletion reason in such cases. Bovlb (talk) 16:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for checking.

The item was empty because I had only just created it and had not yet added the statements and references. I would like to continue improving the item with reliable sources.

@Ziv Could you please review the undeletion request and restore Q141259666?

Thank you very much. Lipperländer32 (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Hallo @Lipperländer32.

Du gestattest doch das ich dir ebenfalls auf Deutsch antworte, da es mir auch einfacher fällt.

• 1. Commons als Relevanzangabe. Der Nutzer hat gerade mal 5 Bilder dort hochgeladen, diese alle ohne plausible Exifdaten und dazu auch noch mit Wasserzeichen, was in der Regel für die Weiterverwendung von Bildern per c:Commons:Exif doch eher unerwünscht ist. Das aber nur am Rande.
• 2. anklickbare Links wären äusserst hilfreich und nicht die blosse Erwähnung wie "Lippische Wochenzeitung" oder "Lippischer Heimatbund".
• 3. Auch ohne dies genauer prüfen zu können scheint Mika Weiser doch eher nur regional bekannt zu sein und eine Notabilität der Person erschliesst sich mir deshalb nicht, auch wenn das Item ev. nicht fertig ausgebaut war.

Von meiner Seite daher Declined, aber weitere Kommentare oder Meinungen gerne erwünscht.

Beste Grüsse, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 18:18, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Follow-up on unresolved undeletion request: Q137733626 (Rastry)

Hello,

I am following up on the undeletion request for Q137733626 (Rastry).

The previous discussion received a comment from Bovlb and a subsequent clarification, but it was then archived without an administrator either restoring the item or providing a decision on whether it meets Wikidata:Notability.

I do not want to recreate the item or open parallel appeals. I am simply asking for an administrative review of the existing deletion.

Could an uninvolved administrator please review the deleted revisions and the sourcing already provided in the previous discussions and either:

• restore Q137733626; or
• explain which Wikidata:Notability criterion the item does not meet?

The previous request specifically addressed criterion 2 (N2) and included the relevant serious and publicly available sources, so I will not duplicate the full sourcing here.

Previous discussion: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive/2026/08#Q137733626_(Rastry)_—_seguimiento_de_solicitud_de_restauración_sin_resolver

Earlier request: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive/2026/08#Q137733626_(Rastry)_—_solicitud_de_revisi%C3%B3n_del_borrado

Thank you. Bmedinawiki (talk) 16:46, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Third appeal. No new information provided. Bovlb (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

I believe there may have been a misunderstanding, and I apologize if my wording caused confusion.

I was not requesting another appeal. I was asking what final determination had been reached in the previous undeletion request, since that discussion was archived after the comments and my clarification without a stated outcome.

For clarity, I am summarizing below the serious and publicly available sources on which I understood Q137733626 (Rastry) to satisfy criterion 2 (N2), and what each source actually provides about the entity.

Independent media sources relevant to N2

TN — 7 June 2026

https://tn.com.ar/show/famosos/2026/06/07/quien-es-kode-el-primer-artista-argentino-creado-con-ia-quiero-que-la-gente-sienta-que-le-canto-de-verdad/

The article contains a dedicated section titled “Rastry, el productor musical que está detrás de Kode González”. It identifies Esteban Fernández Palavecino as Rastry and describes him as a recognized music producer and artistic director. It names artists with whom he has worked, discusses his background as a multi-instrumentalist, and substantially describes the development process behind Kode González. The article also includes Rastry's first-person account of a serious accident that affected his ability to continue playing instruments as before and led him toward exploring artificial intelligence applied to music. This provides biographical and professional coverage of Rastry beyond a simple mention in connection with the Kode González project.

BigBang News — 1 May 2026

https://www.bigbangnews.com/show/musica-20-kode-gonzalez-primer-cantante-argentino-cumbia-creado-inteligencia-artificial-n101123

The article identifies Rastry as the producer behind the project, describes more than 25 years of professional activity in Argentine popular music and three Premios Gardel, and contains several passages discussing his creative and technical work, including the development and training of the vocal system.

Radio Nacional — 30 April 2026

https://www.radionacional.com.ar/conocemos-al-primer-cantante-argentino-de-cumbia-argentino-hecho-con-ia/

Radio Nacional identifies Rastry as a music producer, winner of three Premios Gardel, with more than 25 years of activity in Argentine popular music. The report also discusses his work developing and training his own vocal model and includes his explanations about that work.

Ciudad Magazine / MShow — 11 May 2026

https://www.ciudad.com.ar/espectaculos/2026/05/11/mshow-entrevisto-a-kode-gonzalez-el-primer-cantante-de-cumbia-creado-con-ia-video/

This is an audiovisual interview published by Ciudad Magazine / MShow. As I clarified in the previous discussion, Rastry appears personally throughout the live interview and explains what he created, how he developed it, the process behind its creation, and why he created it. It is therefore not merely a passing mention of Rastry in connection with Kode González; the interview contains substantial discussion of his work as creator and producer.

El Liberal — 26 October 2020

https://www.elliberal.com.ar/nota/-526604/2020/10/video--ramoncito-alvarez-participo-en-la-produccion-junto-a-rastry-para-el-ex-rafaga-rodrigo-trapani-en-la-version-de-polca-de-la-cumbia-yldquoes-tan-grande-este-amoryrdquo

Independent coverage from 2020, well before the AI project. The article identifies Rastry as an Argentine producer and reports his production work together with Ramón Álvarez for Rodrigo Tapari.

Infobae — 8 December 2017

https://www.infobae.com/teleshow/infoshow/2017/12/08/marcela-banos-debuto-como-cantante-de-cumbia-y-lanzo-su-primer-videoclip/

Independent coverage from 2017. The article explicitly identifies Rastry as a music producer and describes his involvement in Marcela Baños's recording project. This establishes public professional identification of the same entity many years before the recent AI project.

Prensario Música — 9 October 2020

https://www.prensariomusica.com/Signos-FM-festeja-hoy-sus-25-anos-con-emSomos-la-Radioem-junto-20-artistas-30649.note.aspx

Independent specialized music-industry coverage explicitly crediting Rastry / Rastry Creaciones Musicales with the musical production of “Somos la Radio”, a project involving twenty artists, including Carlos Vives and Banda XXI.

These sources are not seven repetitions of the same claim. They come from different independent media outlets and different periods, including coverage from 2017 and 2020, years before the Kode González project. Taken together, they identify the same entity and provide information about Rastry's professional role, production work, career history, biographical background and later creative work.

Complementary professional and official documentation

The following were not intended as substitutes for the independent media sources above, but only as corroboration of identity, continuity and documented professional activity.

DNDA / Boletín Oficial de la República Argentina — 25 June 2012

https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/71470/20120625

Official copyright records identify Esteban Alberto Fernández Palavecino in registered musical works. This was provided only as official corroboration of identity and authorial activity predating the recent media coverage.

IPI / SADAIC — IPI 00564418636

The repertoire associated with this identifier contains 138 registered works. This is complementary professional documentation, not independent media coverage.

Muso.AI — professional music-credit database

https://muso.ai/profile/d4824473-9111-4acf-b98e-13ad23f045f5

The Muso.AI profile for Rastry currently shows 439 credits, 225 collaborators and 15 professional roles, including Lyricist (378 credits), Composer (366), Producer (238), Arranger (233) and Director (232). I include this only as complementary documentation of the continuity and scale of the professional activity described by the independent sources above, not as a substitute for those sources or as independent journalistic coverage.

Again, my intention is not to open another appeal. I only wanted to clarify the basis on which I understood Q137733626 to meet criterion 2: it refers to a clearly identifiable entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.

I respectfully ask for the final administrative determination regarding the previous undeletion request.

Thank you very much. Bmedinawiki (talk) 22:54, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:কবি মিজান পঞ্চায়েত

কবি মিজান পঞ্চায়েত 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot. cross-wiki abuse, Wikidata:Autobiography XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 07:51, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of Q139469526

Q139469526 was deleted due to a lack of notability. This item ist one of several DJI drones which I created among dozens of already existing items. The deleting admin seems to be inactive at the moment, so I could not get an answer if drone models are not notable generally. NDG (talk) 11:59, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

CC @MisterSynergy Bovlb (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for undeletion: Q141259492 — TJ Muir

I am the subject of this item and am requesting reconsideration of the deletion of Q141259492.

Since the deletion, the TJ Muir author identity has been assigned ISNI 0000 0005 3092 9483 by Bowker/ISNI: https://isni.org/isni/0000000530929483

The identity also has existing ISFDB and Open Library author records, as well as an official author website: https://tjmuir.com

I understand that recreating the deleted item directly would not be appropriate, so I am asking whether these independent authority records are now sufficient for the item to meet Wikidata’s notability criteria.

Since the deletion, the TJ Muir author identity has been assigned ISNI 0000 0005 3092 9483 by Bowker/ISNI: https://isni.org/isni/0000000530929483 Additional independent bibliographic/authority records include:

ISFDB author record: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?250474 Open Library author record: https://openlibrary.org/authors/OL7554771A/TJ_Muir Fantastic Fiction author record: https://www.fantasticfiction.com/m/tj-muir/

Official author website: https://tjmuir.com

I am requesting reconsideration of Q141259492 based on the new ISNI authority record together with the existing independent bibliographic records.

Thank you. ~2026-47620-98 (talk) 00:47, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Relevant items: Q141259492 (~2026-47620-98). CC deleting admins @Madamebiblio Bovlb (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Protection request for Equal Earth projection (Q56192172)

Repeated vandalism on Equal Earth projection (Q56192172) from multiple accounts. John Samuel (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

 Done ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:49, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:49, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Cilidus

Cilidus 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. ―~2026-48398-38 (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Zzayoi Nonomi

Zzayoi Nonomi 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Long-term abuse XReport ―Morkoz (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

 Done ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:46, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:46, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Protection request for Q346187

Please semi-protect Q346187. Reason: Persistent vandalism XReport --Wassim^talk 05:18, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

 Done ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:20, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:20, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Bobledancer

Bobledancer 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Reasons: Vandalism. --ReneeWrites (talk) 08:05, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for Undeletion of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141111619

I am requesting reconsideration of the deletion of Q141111619. which was deleted for Notability criteria. After discussion with https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Egezort who suggested i contact with you.

Here are few links to support the request

Latest Funding Round https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/funding/auto-ai-firm-intangles-logs-30-million-led-by-avataar-venture-partners/articleshow/124362043.cms?from=mdr

https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/intangles-lab-raises-10-million-in-funds-from-baring-private-equity-123022100511_1.html

Partnership with Force Motors https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/auto/auto-news/force-motors-launches-ai-driven-fleet-intelligence-analytics-platform/articleshow/123120951.cms?from=mdr

https://themachinemaker.com/news/force-motors-partners-with-intangles-to-launch-force-ipulse-for-smarter-safer-mobility/

Patent in US https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/intangles-lab-pvt-ltd-files-patent-for-machine-learning-solution-for-fuel-pilferage/articleshow/82307117.cms

https://auto.hindustantimes.com/auto/cars/punebased-firm-granted-us-patent-for-tech-to-identify-fuel-theft-in-vehicles-41679744927537.html

Others https://www.ttnews.com/articles/ai-meets-maintenance

https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/video/stanislaus-regional-transit-turns-to-ai-to-catch-problems-with-buses/

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/intangles-partners-with-stanrta-to-modernize-transit-fleet-with-ai-analytics

I have not shared press releases and other publications which have written on Intangles technology recently( let me know if you need more links.)

Thanks for your time. Patmilesint (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for undeletion: Registix (Q140668032)

I am requesting undeletion of Registix (Q140668032), which was deleted on 28 July 2026 under WD:N.

I believe the item satisfies Wikidata's notability criteria because Registix is a clearly identifiable entity that can be described using serious, publicly available independent sources. In particular:

• Charlotte Business Journal, 21 March 2025 — substantial independent coverage of Registix and its expansion into a 110,250-square-foot facility in Cornelius:

https://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/news/2025/03/21/registix-logistics-crow-holdings-cornelius-lease.html

• Charlotte Business Journal, 10 September 2025 — separate independent coverage of Registix and its partnership with Tepper Sports & Entertainment at Bank of America Stadium:

https://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/news/2025/09/10/tepper-sports-registix-nfl-mls-panthers-stadium.html

• Cornelius Today, 15 February 2024 — independent coverage focused on Registix, its planned headquarters and innovation hub, operations, workforce, and founder:

https://www.corneliustoday.com/fast-growth-logistics-firm-plans-hq-iinnovation-hub-in-cornelius/

Disclosure: I am affiliated with Registix and have previously disclosed this conflict of interest on my user page. I am providing the independent sources above so the community can assess whether the item satisfies WD:N.

I would appreciate review of the deletion and restoration of Q140668032 if these sources satisfy WD:N. Thank you. RegistixOps (talk) 15:49, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Relevant items: Q140668032 (RegistixOps). CC deleting admins @Ziv Bovlb (talk) 16:09, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Notability is not demonstrated by the cited sources; these were already linked in the deleted item, some behind a paywall. So, there is nothing new here, and consequently, the request is Declined. However, further comments or remarks from others are certainly welcome. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 17:41, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion request - Q139695796 Nutri Tailor

Hi,

I created Q139695796 in May, it was deleted by WikiBayer for notability, at the time I only provided Companies House as a source.

I'm requesting Nutri Tailor wikidata page be reinstated as there are now multiple public sources to demonstrate our authenticity. See below:

• https://techround.co.uk/startups/nutri-tailor-launches-nutri365-a-first-of-its-kind-ai-nutritional-therapist/
• https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14867424
• https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/nutritailor.co.uk
• https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/nutri-tailor-ai-health-expert/id6736969891
• https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.shopney.nutritailor
• https://www.linkedin.com/company/nutritailor
• https://tracxn.com/d/companies/nutri-tailor/__j1d466WrrKBkTwOMLu4uIyQeq-bsw8pOrtaEa-LLsaA

If you need any further information just let me know.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards, Henry

Nutritailor (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Relevant items: Q139695796 (Nutritailor). CC deleting admins @WikiBayer Bovlb (talk) 00:10, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

No Link ais a reputable not self created soruce --WikiBayer (talk) 04:55, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-48665-52

~2026-48665-52 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―ANTORLGOY (talk) 05:33, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 06:28, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 06:28, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Undeletion Request - Q139577074 (Avonetiq)

Want to request a review of why these two items got deleted.

Q139577074 (Avonetiq) was deleted as a recreation of Q137855896, but these are actually two different things:

Q139577074 = Avonetiq, a company/digital authority firm that handles AI Visibility for brands, Q137855896 = AVO by Avonetiq, a SaaS product built by Avonetiq for AI SEO & GEO.

So it's one company and its product. Not a duplicate.

On notability, there's some independent coverage:

- VOI (voi.id) wrote about the AVO launch at the IDMC event, with a direct quote from Avonetiq's co-founder: https://voi.id/en/technology/578651

- SWA.co.id also has an article about Avonetiq: https://swa.co.id/read/469734/avonetiq-kenalkan-ai-visibility-optimization-untuk-brand

Haven't recreated the item, just want it reviewed and considered for restoration. Thanks AnanggaSribu (talk) 08:26, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Relevant items: Q137855896 (AnanggaSribu), Q139577074 (AnanggaSribu), Q141251892 (AnanggaSribu). CC deleting admins @EPIC, Fralambert Bovlb (talk) 18:49, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:JordansDIH

JordansDIH 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―Icodense (talk) 10:31, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 12:09, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 12:09, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Pozzimauro

Pozzimauro 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Block evasion. User:Marciamoindue XReport ―NDG (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Globally locked by stewards. Ternera (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 19:25, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-45164-90

~2026-45164-90 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Block evasion. User:Marciamoindue XReport ―NDG (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Draudykle

Draudykle 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:MusicDar

MusicDar 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:44, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Phaohoavietnam

Phaohoavietnam 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

 Done by Ziv. Ternera (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Ternera (talk) 19:25, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Private mailing list for administrators

The private mailing list for administrators is now available: https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikidata-admins.lists.wikimedia.org

Administrators who wish to join are welcome to subscribe. Please email either me or ZI Jony for verification of your email address, so we can confirm that the email address being added belongs to you and not someone else. Saroj (talk) 05:41, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-35277-51 and others

• ~2026-35277-51 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) (most recent, but active since June)
• ~2026-47045-12 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
• ~2026-45885-35 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
• ~2026-47326-92 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
• ~2026-45962-47 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))

Reasons: LTA (similar blocks: [16][17]). Horcrux (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Request for review of indefinite block (Called Here LLC)

Hello,

My account Called Here LLC was recently blocked indefinitely for “spamming.” I want to clarify that I was not intentionally spamming. I was working on a single item and made multiple edits because I was learning how to correctly add references, identifiers, and structured data.

I understand how the rapid sequence of edits may have appeared, but my intention was only to follow Wikidata’s guidelines and improve the item. I am still new to the platform and would appreciate guidance on how to edit safely without triggering automated or manual spam flags.

I respectfully request that my block be reviewed. I am willing to follow any editing recommendations, slow down my edit pace, and work under mentorship to avoid future issues.

Thank you for your time.

— Called Here LLC Called Here LLC (talk) 10:23, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relevant items: Q141239103 (Called Here LLC), Q141136567 (Called Here LLC), Q140514647 (Called Here LLC). CC deleting admins @Madamebiblio, The Squirrel Conspiracy

You account was not blocked, but three of the items you have created have been deleted. Please consult our inclusion criteria, policy on paid editing and guidelines on self-promotion. Bovlb (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Also, Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion. Bovlb (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Correction. Your account was blocked on Commons. You need to appeal that there. We can't do anything about that. Bovlb (talk) 16:28, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Wingless Style

Wingless Style 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:32, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Urbaniahiredelhi

Urbaniahiredelhi 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:33, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:ElPortalO

ElPortalO 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:34, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:OticaVisual

OticaVisual 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 12:37, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked indefinitely. --Saroj (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. --Saroj (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

RFU: Q141048072 (Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira)

Olá. Gostaria de pedir a restauração do item Q141048072 (Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira).

O item Q141048072 não é propaganda. O item Q141048072 representa um registro factual de Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira, um pesquisador e autor brasileiro.

Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira possui registro oficial no ORCID (0000-0002-5510-1445: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5510-1445). Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira também publicou artigos e livros acadêmicos que têm DOI e ISBN registrados, tais como:

- Artigo no Brazilian Journal of Development (2021) – DOI: 10.34117/BJDV7N1-706 (https://doi.org/10.34117/BJDV7N1-706) - Livro publicado em 2023 – DOI: 10.29327/5336951 (https://doi.org/10.29327/5336951)

Além disso, Italu Bruno Colares de Oliveira aparece em veículos de imprensa, como RedeTV! DF e o programa Fala DF. O item Q141048072 será mantido estritamente com dados neutros e fontes oficiais.

Obrigado. JvL04 (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Relevant items: Q141048072 (JvL04), Q141008828 (JvL04). CC deleting admins @Madamebiblio, The Squirrel Conspiracy

See also: Q141244682 Bovlb (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2026 (UTC)