Wikidata:互助客棧

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
維基數據互助客棧
這裏可以討論和維基數據相關的任何內容,包括項目本身、方針、提議、數據內容、技術問題等等。
在本頁面中,舊的將會在存檔。所有的存檔可以在檔案館當中找到。現存的存檔頁面位於2018/11


請求合併Q55861611和Q55718346[edit]

兩個數據是同一個人物。Siujyuzi (talk) 02:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

請求合併 Q661441 和 Q20744249[edit]

從百科頁面的描述證實兩者是相同的:

--Reke (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

啊啊已經有人✓ Done了。--Reke (talk) 12:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

請求合併Q56284458與Q24897274[edit]

不好意思,不小心搞錯,沒發現已存在同一個頁面。--HellWK (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

請求更正中文名 Q15905035[edit]

正確應為→黃士杰,可佐證 zh:黃士杰 (音樂人) --Artejune (talk) 21:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

@Artejune:恐怕無能為力,涉及簡繁轉換問題。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
@Liuxinyu970226: 謝謝回覆 --Artejune (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for comment/2018 administrator policy update[edit]

A RFC has been proposed on changes to various administrator and user conduct policies including edit warring, page protection, involved administrators, and interface administrators. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC) (for Rschen7754)

請求合併Q132628到Q25414198[edit]

根據APG IV,鞭寄生亞科(Hydnoroideae)現在被放在胡椒目馬兜鈴科裡面。參考資料:[1]Yrr933! (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

99of9
Abbe98
Achim Raschka (talk)
Brya (talk)
Dan Koehl (talk)
Daniel Mietchen (talk)
Faendalimas
FelixReimann (talk)
Infovarius (talk)
Jean-Marc Vanel
Joel Sachs
Josve05a (talk)
Klortho (talk)
Lymantria (talk)
MargaretRDonald
Mellis (talk)
Michael Goodyear
MPF
Mr. Fulano (talk)
Nis Jørgensen
Peter Coxhead
PhiLiP
Andy Mabbett (talk)
Plantdrew
Prot D
pvmoutside
Rod Page
Soulkeeper (talk)
Strobilomyces (talk)
Tinm
Tom.Reding
Tommy Kronkvist (talk)
TomT0m
Tubezlob
RaboKarbakian
Circeus Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject Taxonomy --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Hydnoraceae is the name of a family
  • Hydnoroideae is the name of a subfamily

By definition two different concepts. - Brya (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Brya is correct. First of all It seems very odd to merge a subfamily of "family A" into another "family B", without also including the parent "family A" in the merge. Unless of course APG IV claims that Hydnoraceae ("family A") is now considered defunct and has invalidated that taxon, and in the process of doing so has lifted out its daughter taxon (i.e. subfamily) Hydnoroideae into Aristolochiaceae ("family B"), which doesn't seem to be the case.
Secondly (and regardless of APG IV) we shouldn't merge the Wikidata item of a family, with the Wikidata item of one of its own subfamilies. Both taxon names represents sovereign taxa in their own rights (valid or not), hence each of them deserves individual, specific Wikidata items. This is analogous to the fact that we also keep separate Wikidata items for valid species names and their synonyms, rather than merge the synonyms with their valid counterparts. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 18:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC).
As has been pointed out before, although such items are described (in English anyway) as instances of "taxon", they are more accurately instances of "taxon name". We should not merge taxon names, regardless of any opinion as to the synonymy of the associated taxa. Each has its own history, associated data (author, date, bibliographic reference, etc.) and entry in taxonomic databases. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Indeed Peter, and of course I know this. Nonetheless: thanks for pointing it out. There is of course a big difference between "taxon" and "taxon name", and unfortunately the terms are often mixed together (also by me) even though they're not really interchangeable. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 19:59, 29 September 2018 (UTC).