From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search


兩個數據是同一個人物。Siujyuzi (talk) 02:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

請求合併 Q661441 和 Q20744249[edit]


--Reke (talk) 12:04, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

啊啊已經有人✓ Done了。--Reke (talk) 12:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


不好意思,不小心搞錯,沒發現已存在同一個頁面。--HellWK (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

請求更正中文名 Q15905035[edit]

正確應為→黃士杰,可佐證 zh:黃士杰 (音樂人) --Artejune (talk) 21:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

@Artejune:恐怕無能為力,涉及簡繁轉換問題。--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
@Liuxinyu970226: 謝謝回覆 --Artejune (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for comment/2018 administrator policy update[edit]

A RFC has been proposed on changes to various administrator and user conduct policies including edit warring, page protection, involved administrators, and interface administrators. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC) (for Rschen7754)


根據APG IV,鞭寄生亞科(Hydnoroideae)現在被放在胡椒目馬兜鈴科裡面。參考資料:[1]Yrr933! (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Achim Raschka (talk)
Brya (talk)
Dan Koehl (talk)
Daniel Mietchen (talk)
FelixReimann (talk)
Infovarius (talk)
Jean-Marc Vanel
Joel Sachs
Josve05a (talk)
Klortho (talk)
Lymantria (talk)
Mellis (talk)
Michael Goodyear
Mr. Fulano (talk)
Nis Jørgensen
Peter Coxhead
Andy Mabbett (talk)
Prot D
Rod Page
Soulkeeper (talk)
Strobilomyces (talk)
Tommy Kronkvist (talk)
Circeus Pictogram voting comment.svg Notified participants of WikiProject Taxonomy --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Hydnoraceae is the name of a family
  • Hydnoroideae is the name of a subfamily

By definition two different concepts. - Brya (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Brya is correct. First of all It seems very odd to merge a subfamily of "family A" into another "family B", without also including the parent "family A" in the merge. Unless of course APG IV claims that Hydnoraceae ("family A") is now considered defunct and has invalidated that taxon, and in the process of doing so has lifted out its daughter taxon (i.e. subfamily) Hydnoroideae into Aristolochiaceae ("family B"), which doesn't seem to be the case.
Secondly (and regardless of APG IV) we shouldn't merge the Wikidata item of a family, with the Wikidata item of one of its own subfamilies. Both taxon names represents sovereign taxa in their own rights (valid or not), hence each of them deserves individual, specific Wikidata items. This is analogous to the fact that we also keep separate Wikidata items for valid species names and their synonyms, rather than merge the synonyms with their valid counterparts. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 18:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC).
As has been pointed out before, although such items are described (in English anyway) as instances of "taxon", they are more accurately instances of "taxon name". We should not merge taxon names, regardless of any opinion as to the synonymy of the associated taxa. Each has its own history, associated data (author, date, bibliographic reference, etc.) and entry in taxonomic databases. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Indeed Peter, and of course I know this. Nonetheless: thanks for pointing it out. There is of course a big difference between "taxon" and "taxon name", and unfortunately the terms are often mixed together (also by me) even though they're not really interchangeable. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 19:59, 29 September 2018 (UTC).