User talk:Syced

Jump to: navigation, search

About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Syced/Archive 1 on 2016-08-29.

Jc86035 (talkcontribs)

Is inception (P571) necessary where there is already date of official opening (P1619)? I think it might be unnecessary and possibly incorrect if the station existed previously but was not open until that date.

Jc86035 (talkcontribs)

Moved to Wikidata:Project chat.

Reply to "Addition of P571"
Higa4 (talkcontribs)

I just found your note about the 5th birthday meeting at Roppongi. Is it the same place as we met last year?

Reply to "5th birthday meeting"
Jura1 (talkcontribs)

Hi Syced,

Please avoid dumping data into Wikidata if you believe that it's incorrect. You shouldn't rely on other people to care clean up your edits .

Luckily for embassies, it happens you did the correct thing, but P155/P156 should be used as qualifiers and one should think of a plan to correct it when adding it as statements.

Syced (talkcontribs)

Nothing at follows (P155) says that the property must always be used as a qualifier (the talk page says it "can"). Actually, two of the three property examples at that page illustrate how to use the property directly, see for instance how April follows March, and how The Two Towers follows The Fellowship of the Ring. That being said, now I understand the merits of using a series. If you believe that only qualifier usage is OK, then please edit the property's documentation, and I will delete the statements that do not follow the new rule. In the example of your second diff, what do you think would be the best thing to do? Create a new item for the series? Cheers!

Reply to "editing quality and data dump"
Multichill (talkcontribs)

Could use a hand of a Japanese speaker at Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Possible paintings. The instructions are at the top of the page. Thanks!

Syced (talkcontribs)

I started enhancing them, I did a dozen so far, quite interesting, thanks!

Multichill (talkcontribs)

Excellent! The bot looks in Category:Paintings (Q6009893), so in your case ja:Category:絵画作品. If you see a lot of non-paintings or other weird stuff showing up, it's probably because the category tree is incorrect somewhere. It might be a bit of a puzzle to solve that.

Multichill (talkcontribs)

Any luck with this? Still quite a bit list from jawp.

Reply to "Possible paintings"
Multichill (talkcontribs)

I set up the bot and did some test edits under my own bot account (example). Please have a look at [[Wikidata:Database reports/without claims by site/jawiki] and Wikidata:Database reports/templates and items with 0 claims/jawiki. Based on that you can probably expand ja:利用者:NoclaimsBot/Template claim. The bot will run every day.

Reply to "Noclaimsbot on jawp"
XXN (talkcontribs)

Hi. (Regarding your post on project chat) MTC!, a tool developed by Fastily, written in Java, is open-source. I think in your community should be at least one user with programmer skills, who can code in Java. If you'll start a discussion locally about this fact, perhaps someone will be able to modify and adapt this tool for your wiki, and everyone will be happy seeing tons of files moved to Commons :)

Reply to "Batch transfer tool"
Glorian WD (talkcontribs)

Hi Syced!

I have finished analyzing the pilot campaign result. You can find the analysis result here. I have also proposed some changes on the existing item quality criteria. You might want to take a look at those :)

Thanks!

Reply to "Pilot Campaign Analysis Result"
Glorian WD (talkcontribs)

Hi Syced!

Thanks for your feedback for item quality model! I do appreciate your idea and feedback :)

I would like to ask if you are aware about this landing page: Wikidata:Item quality campaign. Additionally, I'd like to ask if you have participated in the pilot campaign :D

Merci!

Reply to "Pilot Campaign"

Wikidata bento in Tokyo, October 28th

10
Higa4 (talkcontribs)

Hello,

Can I join the bento meet up?  I'm a wikidata beginner and an OpenStreetMapper.

Syced (talkcontribs)

Hello,

Of course! See you at http://i.imgur.com/wP0gYP8.jpg at 12:00 tomorrow :-)

Higa4 (talkcontribs)

OK!

Syced (talkcontribs)

Since you are an OpenStreetMapper, how about working on this tomorrow? https://github.com/nicolas-raoul/database-of-embassies/issues/2

It is a useful task that links Wikidata and OpenStreetMap.

Higa4 (talkcontribs)

Thanks for your information. It's one of my concern if importing OSM objects into wikidata is possible legally, not technically.

Is there an agreement between wikidata community and OSM foundation for importing?

I'm not an ODbL enthusiast though, there may be some license violation for bulk import from ODbL to CC0 even if it may be fact data. If importing is "Substantial", ODbL license should be carried.

http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Substantial_-_Guideline

Syced (talkcontribs)

Inserting Wikidata identifiers into OpenStreetMap is 100% legal. Wikidata identifiers are public domain, and importing public domain material into OpenStreetMap is OK.

Syced (talkcontribs)

Thinking more about it, I agree with you that the second phase is problematic, thanks for the insight! I divided the Github issues into two phases for better clarity. We can at least start with phase 1, which is legal, I believe.

Higa4 (talkcontribs)

I agree. Wikidata -> OSM is OK.

Higa4 (talkcontribs)

Sorry, I may be late 10 or 20 min.

Syced (talkcontribs)

Understood!

Reply to "Wikidata bento in Tokyo, October 28th"

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)

Hello!

Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply to "Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey"
There are no older topics