User talk:Moe Epsilon

From Wikidata
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

  • Ideally, I would like to have any conversation continued on the page where it was started. If I have left a message on your talk page please do not reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
  • Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
  • Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
  • To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
  • You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Contents

Wikidata weekly summary #70[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #71[edit]

Q19763[edit]

I see that you have earlier deleted this item as not conforming with the deletion policy. Could you please give a hint why you decided it does not conform with the policy? I do not see it immediately, but of course there can be some issues which I overlooked. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Per the notability guideline: "To be valid a link must not be a talk page, nor a MediaWiki page, nor a special page, nor a user page, nor a subtemplate, nor a file." and Q19763 was for a template talk page. There's not a particular issue, I was just following that guideline. Of course I could be mistaken, but I thought most of the other sitelinks linking to it were also Did You Know template talk pages as well. What the item equated to, in my opinion, was an archive and I don't believe that really falls under what we should have as an item. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 19:30, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Actually, I just took a look back and I found more issues with it than what I originally thought after looking at some of the other language links. The item itself is particularly confusing. The item seemed to be the place where all the Did You Knows current nomination proposals went. However, for each language, it's very different. One is on the template discussion, some are on the Wikipedia namespace, some on a subpage. We might need to have some kind of discussion somewhere to discuss if these kinds of items are acceptable or not, because some pages are not simply proposal pages, they are discussion and whatnot, so I don't know if they fall under what we find acceptable. I don't mind undeleting and finding someplace to discuss it. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 19:39, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #72[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #73[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #74[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #75[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #76[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #77[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #78[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #79[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #80[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #81[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #82[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #83[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #84[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #85[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #86[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #87[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #88[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #89[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #90[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #91[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #92[edit]

Broken imports[edit]

As you may have already noticed, several of your recent imports were from the Module space directly onto the Template space, severely breaking the relevant templates. --Yair rand (talk) 11:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, that was strange. Some of these modules already exist, so I guess there shouldn't be a problem just deleting some of what I brought over. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 13:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
I think I've fixed it, thanks for telling me. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 13:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Q15628586[edit]

As you can see if you browse to the relevant pages, this isn't an ordinary MediaWiki message, but a template stored in the MediaWiki namespace (don't ask me why, in the wiki that I'm able to do changes, pt.wikisource, it is stored in Template namespace; some others Wikisources does it in te same way). Lugusto (talk) 15:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, I see that now after looking at the English Wikisource, they transclude the MediaWiki namespace. [1] I'm not sure why this is done, but I'll go ahead and restore it for you. You may want to start a thread at the Wikidata:Notability talk page and see if it can be added as an exemption so it doesn't get deleted again. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 16:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Authority control properties and other navigation templates[edit]

Hi, {{Authority control properties}} does not work after your deletion {{Navbox}}. I do not understand comment "botched import". Could you restore {{Navbox}}? — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Apologies. I've restored it for you. After messing up an import and a history mixed up in the process, I thought this corrected an error. I'll go back and see if I missed anything else. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 07:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


If everyone could bare with me, there appears to have been a bug in the MediaWiki which resulted in history of modules from Wikidata being imported to Wikidata when I attempted to import an English Wikipedia template. It's a very confusing pattern of edit histories trying to be restored back. Right now, Template:Navbar, Template:Namespace detect and Template:Category handler are not functional. If another administrator wants to make an attempt at trying to resolve the issue, that would be most appreciated. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 08:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Update: Category handler has been fixed, still working on reparing the other two. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 08:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Update Appears I've been able to fix Namespace detect too. Only remaining issue is getting the navbar up and working again. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 08:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #93[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #94[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #95[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #96[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #97[edit]

babel setting[edit]

Hello Moe Epsilon. Your user page is categorized into Category:User de, Category:User ja, etc., but sortkeys are not specified at all. I think you should set a language-level for each sortkey. For example, [[Category:User de|3]], [[Category:User ja|2]], etc. --Penn Station (talk) 06:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

I suppose I could. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 05:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #98[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #99[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #100[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #101[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #102[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #103[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #104[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #105[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #106[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #107[edit]

simple/en[edit]

you have a simple-en-language babel on your user page. please don't add labels, descriptions or aliases in simple-en. they should instead be made in en. see Wikidata:Project_chat#'als'/'gsw'? 'de-formal'?. --Akkakk 07:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #108[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #109[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #110[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #110[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #111[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #112[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #113[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #114[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #115[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #116[edit]

Wikidata weekly summary #117[edit]