User talk:Midleading/Flow

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Midleading/Archive 1 on 2018-11-06.

I noticed you made this edit, undoing my change to instance of (P31) marking the property as a qualifier. Could you say more about why? JesseW (talk) 15:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

I have not seen a property which is not an instance of "Wikidata property (related to ...)"

But

⟨ Wikidata qualifier (Q15720608)    ⟩ instance of (P31) ⟨ Wikidata property (Q18616576)    ⟩

is true. It's a perfectly valid subclass.

The whole "Wikidata property related to X" hierarchy is redundant in a complicated way with other ways of sorting properties; I'm planning (eventually) to write up an RfC suggesting fixes for it. You can see the existing discussion here, if you are interested: Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2022/09#We've_got_nearly_200_uncategorized_Properties

I had to revert your edits in rac-salbutamol (Q410358) once again. This item is about a racemate, i.e. a mixture of two enantiomers. Most probably there will never be an illustration suitable for this item. This illustration would be correct for (RS)-salbutamol (Q93346928), such illustrations are not really useful in Wikidata, as it does not represent a specific stereoisomers that can be depicted in 3D, each stereoisomer can have a 3D model of itself. Also, this and this do not illustrate the racemate, but the pharmaceutical products, so the first one is now in Ventolin (Q47522282) (I think there is no item for the second one yet). Wikidata is not a Wikipedia, an illustration must be specific to the concept of the item and not just be related to it in some way.

What about related image (P6802)?

If there is no suitable image in image (P18), chemical structure (P117) or molecular model or crystal lattice model (P8224), then yes, related image (P6802) may be used. I have no objections to the use of this property in chemistry-related items like in this situation, that's what it was created for after all (only personally I find it really strange that it was created at all in a project like Wikidata).

You are doing excellent work with not notable stuff when adding content to our Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions! But it would be extra good if you would notice the creator (e.g. like I did at User talk:Sulejerry). Such notiying would easifying administrators' work considerably

Sure.

E.g. Q117272628. Thanks for your contributions though.

Hi, you marked Wikidata:Property proposal/beforehand-afterward owned by as "ready" but did not created those 2 properties yet. Can you create them and ping me and I will do the rest?

@Jarekt:  Done beforehand owned by (P11811) afterward owned by (P11812)

Hi there! I see that you use that script to create properties. I added it to my JS, but couldn't find out how it works. Could you explain how me to use it? Thanks,

When you use this tool, a link named "PropertyCreator helper form" will appear in page tools in a property proposal. Clicking on it will bring you to a form where you fill in information from the property proposal. You may preload the form which helps you fill in the form. Check everything is correct, then click "Create" button. Wait until the property is created by checking out your contributions, and finally update the property proposal, notify the users and edit the new property. I didn't have a user JS. I always load it from the browser console when I need to use it. You will find information printed by this tool in the browser console as well.

Thanks :)

I don't think that edits like , are correct. CAS Common Chemistry may give you a 'Get detail failed: Detail not found' error, but this service does not contain all the CAS numbers from CAS Registry, it contains a selection of CAS numbers, about 0,5 million from over 200 million entries.

In other words: CAS number is correct, but CAS Common Chemistry does not have it (but CAS Registry, which is not a free service, do).

Okay, I accessed CAS SciFinderⁿ and confirmed these CAS numbers are on CAS REGISTRY®.

Hi I noticed this edit by your bot today but I can't find any corresponding bot requests. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q371362&curid=353382&diff=2248100652&oldid=2201538241

These edits are part of "Ongoing and uncontroversial" tasks on Wikidata:WikiProject Redundancy to remove unneeded P143, thank you.

Thanks for the link and for doing this work.

		The Wikidata Barnstar
		Thank you for your bot on ref:importé du projet Wikimedia (P143) removed!

Archived

Hello

This is an important message regarding this page.

This page uses Structured Discussions/Flow, an obsolete tool that causes many maintenance problems. It has been decided to remove this tool from the wikis.

As of December 16, it will no longer be possible to add a new topic or post a message on this page.

Before this date, you can move or have this page moved to a subpage, in order to archive it. Once moved, this page will become a standard discussion page.

If you get this message on your personal talk page, it is probably because you turned Structured Discussions on, using the Beta features page. Please check there if you can to turn Structured Discussions off.

If you haven't moved this page by December 16, a script will automatically move the page to an archive page (the format will be Page name/Flow). The page using Structured Discussions/Flow will then be made read-only.

If you have any questions, please let me know!

Trizek_(WMF)

ok