User talk:Luca.favorido

Welcome to Wikidata, Luca.favorido!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

Prahlad balaji (talk) 18:55, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Hi I'm user of simple English Wikipedia. Could you please tell how to use this wiki as I tried two or three there.TTP1233 (talk) 13:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

[WMF Board of Trustees - Call for feedback: Community Board seats] Meetings with the Wikidata community

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is organizing a call for feedback about community selection processes between February 1 and March 14. While the Wikimedia Foundation and the movement have grown about five times in the past ten years, the Board’s structure and processes have remained basically the same. As the Board is designed today, we have a problem of capacity, performance, and lack of representation of the movement’s diversity. Our current processes to select individual volunteer and affiliate seats have some limitations. Direct elections tend to favor candidates from the leading language communities, regardless of how relevant their skills and experience might be in serving as a Board member, or contributing to the ability of the Board to perform its specific responsibilities. It is also a fact that the current processes have favored volunteers from North America and Western Europe. In the upcoming months, we need to renew three community seats and appoint three more community members in the new seats. This call for feedback is to see what processes can we all collaboratively design to promote and choose candidates that represent our movement and are prepared with the experience, skills, and insight to perform as trustees?

In this regard, two rounds of feedback meetings are being hosted to collect feedback from the Wikidata community. Two rounds are being hosted with the same agenda, to accomodate people from various time zones across the globe. We will be discussing ideas proposed by the Board and the community to address the above mentioned problems. Please sign-up according to whatever is most comfortable to you. You are welcome to participate in both as well!

• Round 1 - Feb 24, 4:00 pm UTC
• Round 2 - Mar 3, 4:00 am UTC
• Sign-up and meeting details: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees/Call for feedback: Community Board seats/Conversations/Wikidata

Also, please share this with other volunteers who might be interested in this. Let me know if you have any questions. KCVelaga (WMF), 14:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Catalogo MnM decorati onorificenze repubblica

Ciao! Ho notato che il catalogo in questione (https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/4236) sembra avere un problemino: le entry sono corrette, così come le loro descrizioni, ma stranamente i link esterni vengono generati non usando URL di formattazione + id, bensì usando url di formattazione + nome della entry, il che genera ovviamente un errore. Forse c'è stato un errore nell'impostazione dello scraper. Credo che convenga reimportare il catalogo, che mi pare un ottimo strumento di lavoro. Grazie mille e buona notte! --Epìdosis 21:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Ciao Epìdosis!

Grazie della segnalazione. Purtroppo ho notato questo problema e non è da poco essendo su 300.000 elementi.

Probabilmente mi è sfuggito qualcosa con lo strumento di scraping di Mix N Match.

Nel frattempo, ho fatto scraping per conto mio dello stesso catalogo, con gli ID corretti, perché vorrei reimportarli.

Per caso sai come si elimina un' importazione? Mi trovo un po' in difficoltà. Se provo a importare il nuovo catalogo, mi sa che aggiunge nuovamente tutti gli elementi. E il catalogo diventerebbe di 600.000 elementi di cui metà errati.

Grazie della pazienza, buona giornata!

--Luca.favorido (talk) 07:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Puoi importare separatamente un nuovo catalogo, poi me lo dici e io cancello il precedente ;-) --Epìdosis 09:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Ciao Epìdosis,

Ti ringrazio del consiglio. Ho importato il nuovo catalogo. Con un po' di pazienza dovrebbe arrivare a 320.000. - Nuovo catalogo 4245

Ti chiedo perciò di cancellare quello vecchio. - Vecchio catalogo 4236.

Grazie ancora ;-) --Luca.favorido (talk) 18:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Grazie a te, --Epìdosis 18:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Family names: Wolfram Language entity code (P4839) and 2010 United States Census surname index (Q92953148)

Hi Luca.favorido,

Wolfram seems to have used the same source for many of its entries. Consequently, it should be possible to match many of them against [1]. --- Jura 14:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jura,

Thanks :-) This is a very interesting information and in my opinion we should really add it to Wikidata (maybe with quickstatement batches), because it seems to be the primary source. --Luca.favorido (talk) 19:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Daniele Dolfin

La voce Q32985104 si riferisce al Daniele IV Dolfin detto Girolamo, militare, non al fratello Daniele III Dolfin detto Zuanne, ambasciatore e presente in DBI con l'altro fratello Daniele II detto Marco, arcivescovo e cardinale. Peraltro sia il III, sia il IV erano procuratori e cavalieri di san Marco. C'è anche da dire che a partire da Daniele II Dolfin, detto Andrea, nelle quattro generazioni successive dei Dolfin del ramo di san Pantalon quasi tutti erano battezzati Daniele e parecchi ricoprirono ruoli rilevanti. La cosa crea una certa confusione, anche alla Treccani che ne ha biografato soltanto una parte.--Zanekost (talk) 19:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Grazie della precisazione, Zanekost. Sì, anch'io sono ricaduto nella confusione dei vari Daniele :-) --Luca.favorido (talk) 05:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Pietro Cavallo

Pietro Cavallo (Q106486011) sembra difficile che l'autore di questo testo possa aver fatto parte di una società storica creata nel 1990.

-)

--Carlomorino (talk) 11:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Grazie di aver segnalato e corretto la svista, Carlomorino. ;-) --Luca.favorido (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Flag propertycreator

Ciao, vengo anche qui in pubblico per la tua candidatura a propertycreator su wikidata. Come ti ho detto sulla chat telegram GWMAB uno dei più attivi qui ma c'è tanto da fare. Ho trovato un altro candidato oltre un anno che ha aiutato, ma uno in più farebbe comodo.

Hai decine e decine di migliaia di edit, sei abbastanza fluido in inglese che fa comodo, e io e User:Epìdosis possiamo guidarti. Io ho imparato a rifinire da lui, ma alla fine se sai fare buone proposte ID hai tutta la manualità che serve.

Quando vuoi faremo la candidatura. Alexmar983 (talk) 21:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Grazie @Alexmar983,

Rispondo ora perché sono appena rientrato dalle ferie. Ho letto meglio la pagina che spiega chi è un Property creator.

Mi farebbe davvero piacere approfondire e imparare. Quali saranno i prossimi passi? Devo autocandidarmi o accettare la proposta in qualche modo?

Ti ringrazio --Luca.favorido (talk) 14:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

questa è la pagina... se vuoi ti cvandidamo noi, però devi formalmente ricordare che sei al corrente.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Epìdosis ti ha candidato... ricordati di segnalare che sei a favore della candidatura con un breve commento, nel caso.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

author

Hi, not sure where else to write, so I'll try you. Seems an editor named Daask thought the Q482980 should be used differently, and changed it despite the use as an occupation in thousands upon thousands of entries. TherasTaneel (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks @TherasTaneel.

You're right, it could be a mess... I've added a discussion in author (Q482980) to better understand the facts, and explain that it could be very difficult to fix thousands of items.

Thanks for reporting. :-) Luca.favorido (talk) 06:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

duplicated television season items

Hi Luca, please check before creating new season item, whether they already exist. You have created many duplicate items. Also, please check Wikidata:WikiProject_Movies/Properties#Season how a season item should look like. There shouldn't be is a list of (P360) and instance of (P31) should not use Wikimedia list article (Q13406463). Thanks CENNOXX (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear @CennoxX,

You're totally right, I should have read the specific Wikiproject. I took example from other existing elements that were Wikimedia list article (Q13406463), but I was wrong.

I saw you already corrected many the elements using Quick Statements. I fixed the remaining using SPARQL and Quick Statements.

Could it be an idea to add a constraint on property instance of (P31) and is a list of (P360)? I saw it's a common way of avoiding mistakes.

For the duplicates, I used Open Refine for searching which elements were duplicated using the reconciliation feature, but probably something wasn't correctly reconciled.

I will try to check using queries if I spot some duplicates and I will merge them in case.

Thanks a lot for informing me. :-) Luca.favorido (talk) 06:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

It's not a good idea to merge the items, because there are already descriptions in many languages stating the items are wikimedia lists. So this would cause many work for cleaning the descriptions of the items. Therefore I created a deletion request: Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Duplicate_items_with_wrong_descriptions. CENNOXX (talk) 08:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@CennoxX you're right.

In fact before merging some elements I reverted the bot-generated descriptions.

So, if I can help fixing or checking the duplicated I've done, I'm glad to contribute.

Thanks. Luca.favorido (talk) 12:21, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Unioni

Ciao, ho visto che hai unito elementi geografici con aree protette. Per favore in caso di omonimie non fare queste unioni, sono istanze diverse e basate su presupposti giuridici e normativi diversi. Mentre un'area protetta ha una superficie ben definita, l'omonimo elemento geografico non ce l'ha. L'area protetta ha dei riferimenti normativi che il toponimo non ha ecc ecc. É un tema di cui si è già discusso in passato qui Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Italy/2019#Aree_protette_-_troviamo_una_linea_guida. In caso di omonimia fra aree e luoghi geografici andrebbe usato il distinto da (P1889). Grazie Civvì (talk) 11:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Ciao @Civvì, grazie di avermi segnalato la cosa, e grazie di aver ri-diviso gli elementi che ho unito.

Ho letto la discussione, ed in effetti è più che sensato tenere gli elementi divisi.

Sicuramente, dal prossimo caso in cui mi troverò, eviterò di unire e piuttosto aggiungerò io la proprietà different from (P1889). ;-)

--Luca.favorido (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Abbazia di Santa Maria di Càlena

Ciao, ho creato la voce ed associato il wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q117307852. Dopo ho visto che esiste già https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q108320707 puoi sostare le informazioni sul primo? Versouni (talk) 15:09, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Ciao @Versouni,

ho unito le due voci. Grazie dela segnalazione! --Luca.favorido (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Francesca Fanelli

Hi Luca, F Fanelli (Q116873279) and F Fanelli (Q55208926) seems to be the same person but I'm not totally sure. Can you check? --Kolja21 (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Kolja21, you're totally right, I do think they match. I merge them, thanks! Luca.favorido (talk) 18:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Italian verb forms

Hello! Thanks for adding Italian verb lexemes! You might wish to consider omitting from those lexemes the forms consisting of 'avere' or 'essere' followed by a participle, as these could be easily formed by using the appropriate forms from avere (L5138) or essere (L5139) and the participial forms of the verb in question. French, Spanish, and Portuguese verb lexemes are already modeled this way (with respect to avoir/être, haber/estar, haver/estar), so it would make sense to do the same with Italian here. Mahir256 (talk) 01:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Mahir256!

Thanks for pointing this out. The problem is that some tenses of verbs cannot stand alone without the auxiliary verb.

Like for example, in Italian, present perfect (Q1240211) is composed by the auxiliary verb in present indicative (Q56682909) + past participle (Q1230649). And I think that in French, Spanish it is the same.

Therefore, would you suggest to skip all the forms of those tenses? And not model them?

Thanks a lot! :-) Luca.favorido (talk) 02:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

@Luca.favorido: Yes, I would still suggest skipping them for brevity's sake. That only a participial form is present on a verb need not mean that it is able to stand alone, and grammatical rules manifesting as periphrastic constructions are best left as rules, especially when there are situations in which the parts of those constructions are separated (e.g. when other words can come between 'avere' and a participial form). Mahir256 (talk) 02:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

That's clear, thanks! So, I'll fix the verbs I created removing the forms with particular composed tenses. Luca.favorido (talk) 02:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Ma nessuno ti ha detto nulla? Traguardo storico sul tuo edit.

Qui in talk di questo non vedo traccia. Alexmar983 (talk) 05:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Gioachino Venturi

Ciao Luca, questo sito che hai aggiunto come fonte ha in realtà ripreso le informazioni dalla voce di Wikipedia su Linneo quindi non può essere utilizzato. Il testo è stato rielaborato ma non molto ("Molti dei suoi studenti presero parte alle spedizioni e alcuni addirittura perirono durante i viaggi, come per esempio il trentino Gioachino Venturi, colpito dal tifo durante una spedizione in Venezuela." è diventato "A queste spedizioni partecipano molti dei suoi studenti alcuni dei quali vi muoiono anche. Tra i tanti ricordiamo il trentino Gioachino Venturi, colpito dal tifo durante una spedizione in Venezuela."). Il sito esterno è certamente successivo: il riferimento a Venturi era stato aggiunto a ottobre, presumibilmente dalla stessa persona che aveva creato la voce (bufala), mentre l'articolo è datato 10 gennaio 2024. Jaqen (talk) 12:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

@Jaqen, caspita, grazie del controllo fonti. In effetti non ho trovato bibliografie o identificativi autorevoli.

Mi sa che a questo punto ha senso anche segnalare a wikidata in spagnolo :-/ Luca.favorido (talk) 13:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Ho già chiesto la cancellazione immediata della voce in spagnolo, ma non è stata ancora eseguita... Jaqen (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Grammatical features on Italian Lexemes

Ciao,

I just corrected the grammatical features on a few Italian Lexemes (like nostro (L8209)) decomposing features like masculine singular (Q47088290) into masculine (Q499327) and singular (Q110786).

I noticed there is a lot more (see https://w.wiki/9LuL for masculine singular (Q47088290) alone). Could you take a look? (and maybe use this opportunity to do some other improvements on these Lexemes ;) ).

Grazie, VIGNERON (talk) 12:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Bonjour @VIGNERON,

merci pour le signalement. Heureusement, il n'y en a pas tant que ça, et je vais les corriger petit à petit à la main.

Malheureusement, je suis un peu débordé ces jours-ci et je ne peux pas éditer de wikidata.

Bien à vous. Luca.favorido (talk) 05:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Pocket Oxford Italian Dictionary: Italian-English ID

Hi Luca.favorido. Could you please support the creation of the following property: Pocket Oxford Italian Dictionary: Italian-English ID . Thank you. Soufiyouns (talk) 10:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Soufiyouns, thanks for notifying me about it! Luca.favorido (talk) 11:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

@Luca.favorido: Thank you very much for your  Strong support. Could you also support the creation of the reverse property: Pocket Oxford Italian Dictionary: English-Italian ID. Regards. Soufiyouns (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Pocket Oxford-Hachette French Dictionary: French-English ID

Hi Luca.favorido. Could you please support the creation of the following property:Pocket Oxford-Hachette French Dictionary: French-English ID. Thank you. --Soufiyouns (talk) 07:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Soufiyouns, sorry but I have a neutral position about it. I explained my point of view in the related discussion Wikidata_talk:Lexicographical_data#Oxford_dictionaries. Luca.favorido (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Ipotesi aggiornamento del catalogo di NBM

Ciao, ho creato un file csv per NBM authority ID (P9507) e il catalogo https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/4417
Ho però raccolto 22125 voci, contro i 27812 ad oggi nel sito, e contro gli oltre 33000 in MnM.
Due tentativi di aggiornare il catalogo non hanno avuto successo: non sembra partire l'operazione "update from tabbed file".
@Epìdosis pensa che si possa anche rifare del tutto il catalogo cancellando il 4417.
Che ne pensi di tutto questo? Grazie mille.  Bargioni 🗣 19:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Ciao @Bargioni,

Sono d'accordo! Tanto le associazioni con NBM authority ID (P9507) rimangono come dichiarazioni negli elementi. So che @Epìdosis ha i permessi per la cancellazione. Procedete e grazie dell'aggiornamento!

-- Luca.favorido (talk) 19:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Grazie! Ciao. --  Bargioni 🗣 20:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Pipe organ at (formerly) Itami Sun City Hall

Ciao, I guess you may be pleased to get an update. It was successfully relocated to Vietnam, as the Asahi article suggested, and now serves Hanoi community. https://www.city.itami.lg.jp/SOSIKI/KENKOFUKUSHI/TIKI_KONEN/KOUREISYA/31635.html (Japanese)　--Aphaia (talk) 11:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

VIAF changed

Hi,

First, thank you for your tool LinkyPop !

Second, the website of VIAF have changed. the search URL of your tool must be changed to https://viaf.org/fr/viaf/search?field=local.names&index=viaf&searchTerms= Simon Villeneuve (talk) 14:42, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Simon Villeneuve,

First of all thanks for using it :-) I enjoyed coding it and I'm glad it can be useful!

I changed the VIAF search URL with the one you suggested me and the change should be updated soon (in 2 hours). It's right, the site was heavily changed!

The gadget, basically uses the search formatter URL (P4354) property of properties, so everyone can change or add new external search features to Wikidata. Greetings! Luca.favorido (talk) 20:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

noted about the use of P4354.

It seems that there's a problem with the new URL. As an example, when I use the tool with Paul Hewett (Q107199520), it gives me this result. Maybe it's partly linked to the language qualifier of P4354. Simon Villeneuve (talk) 11:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Ok. The language part seems ok now. There's still a repetition of the name in the search box (see Satoru Iguchi (Q16263951) as an example). Simon Villeneuve (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Simon Villeneuve,

Now that the Vector theme rolled out as the default one, I faced your same issue. Before I really couldn't reproduce it.

I made a small fix to avoid the repetition. It could be helpful if you try again and tell me if the text is still duplicated or not.

Thanks and sorry for the delay. --Luca.favorido (talk) 06:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

it seems ok for me now. Thanks for the fix. Simon Villeneuve (talk) 13:51, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Circular etymology

Hi,

On October 2023, you added taccagno (L650353)derived from lexeme (P5191)tacaño (L309750) but without references and on March 2022 Hameryko added the reverse statements tacaño (L309750)derived from lexeme (P5191)taccagno (L650353) with a reference. Such a circular etymology is strange ; I guess different sources can be contradictory... Could you have a look and check?

PS: also, both these lexemes are senseless right now which is also bad.

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello @VIGNERON,

Thanks for pointing it out. I missed the reference and now I've added it. My bad...

That is indeed strange and seems to be a circular dependency of etymology, and personally I don't know which reference to give more trust. What do you suggest to remove the circularity?

I've added the sense too. Salut! Luca.favorido (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure what is the best solution here. Maybe find more and better references? Maybe there is a better etymology that could be put at the preferred rank? I don't know enough this case to have a strong opinion ; the situation is already much better (circular statements are bad but it's better with references), thanks. Maybe Hameryko could help too. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @VIGNERON!

Yes, the situation is better, but I think it'd be hard to untangle.

I've linked an Italian article about this specific word (third reference) and what I get is that it's very difficult to identify the clear etymology with so many theories and so few sources.

In the Italian language it first appeared in 1503 and it was used with 3 different meanings. Then, the current meaning became popular, maybe for the similarity with the dialect root "tacar" (attaccare - to attach - attached to the money).

I found some other words with uncertain etymologies but I preferred to skip them and leave them empty even if they are terribly interesting. :-)

Have a nice day! --Luca.favorido (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I've been researching this and almost all Spanish sources say it comes from Italian, and almost all Italian sources say it comes from Spanish. Although both can't be true at the same time. There are some sources that indicate another etymological origin, such as the French "taquin" or the Hebrew "taqanáh". In any case, it seems to be something more speculative than known for sure. I'm not sure what should be done in these cases. --Hameryko (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

I agree 100%, @Hameryko. The various Romance languages have influenced each other a lot and with some words it is really hard to get to grips with them. One of the things I like about Wikidata is that it is fine. There are sources, there is a contradiction, OK - the sources don't agree. You don't have to resolve all conflicts, although that would obviously be ideal.

Thank you for your opinions! --Luca.favorido (talk) 20:13, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Precisione delle date e riferimenti

Ciao! Ti scrivo per ricordarti che, quando cambi una data migliorando la sua precisione da anno a giorno (ad esempio qui), non puoi lasciare gli stessi riferimenti (mentre aggiungi anche il riferimento per la data precisa al giorno), perché stai dichiarando erroneamente che i vecchi riferimenti sostengono la data precisa al giorno, ma in realtà sostengono soltanto la data precisa all'anno. La soluzione migliore di solito è aggiungere la data precisa al giorno come nuovo valore col suo riferimento (o riferimenti) e porla come valore preferito (cf. User:Bargioni/PrefRank.js); altrimenti puoi rimuovere completamente la data precisa all'anno coi suoi riferimenti e poi aggiungere la data precisa al giorno coi suoi riferimenti. Grazie mille e a presto, --Epìdosis 10:46, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Ciao @Epìdosis, effettivamente è vero ed è probabile che mi sia sfuggito qualche altra volta. Grazie del suggerimento, ci presterò attenzione nei prossimi cambi data. Luca.favorido (talk) 20:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Nomi che devono essere plurali

Ciao. Per caso sai se esiste un modo per indicare che un nome, in un senso, deve sempre essere plurale (ad esempio forbici, pantaloni...)? Dv103 (talk) 19:32, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Ciao @Dv103,

io ho sempre modellato con singola forma con plurale, un po' per semplicità anche se non fa impazzire. Esempi: nozze (L1236098) o viveri (L1341357). È una soluzione di compromesso perché l'assenza di una forma su Wikidata potrebbe far pensare a un non-madrelingua che magari è stato dimenticato il singolare (inducendolo magari ad aggiungerlo), mentre il lemma è solamente plurale e non ammette singolari. La cosa giusta da fare sarebbe affermare che il singolare non c'è.

Fammi sapere che ne pensi. Ti avviso che purtroppo sono sempre meno attivo sulla wiki, vado a periodi! Un saluto Luca.favorido (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Grazie mille per la risposta tempestiva!

Per quanto è vero che viveri e nozze non hanno una forma singolare, credo sia necessario codificare l'obbligatorietà del plurale, proprio per parole che hanno anche forme singolari ma in alcuni sensi devono essere plurali. In assenza di alternative migliori, io andrei per requires grammatical feature (P5713) plural (Q146786) (so che non è una soluzione elegante, ma dovrebbe funzionare).

Questo problema mi è sorto provando a implementare una funzione su Wikifunctions che generi frasi del tipo "<X> è un <Y>", ma essedo l'Italiano sempre l'Italiano, nonostante sia teoricamente il tipo di frasi più semplice che esista, devo considerare un sacco di eccezioni. Dv103 (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

VIAF problem, again

Hi,

Since a couple of days, I got the message "field is invalid!" on a pink/red banner on the VIAF website when I use the LinkyPop tool for VIAF cluster ID (P214). Simon Villeneuve (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2026 (UTC)