Update this subject
User talk:Kghbln
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Update and clean up subject.
Hello here as well. Please make sure to follow Help:Descriptions#Capitalization and only capitalise descriptions when they start with proper nouns. Thanks.
Thanks for the note. I have done this incorrectly on many hundreds of pages here. In future ...
If it was only English, it's relatively easy to fix with TABernacle. I could give it a try tomorrow.
Was not aware of TABernacle. You are welcome to give it a shot!
Oh, nice, there are only 1040 unique pages you've edited in namespace, which is certainly a doable amount with the tool (sorry for not linking it).
As far as such capitalisation issues in general are concerned, I'll raise this at the project chat, as I've now encountered three editors with decent edit counts in a period of two days who weren't aware of the guideline, and I think this is something that should be mentioned in any of those introduction popups a new editor sees when they do their first edits.
No worries. Actually I forgot to add the correct namespace to the page for the tool in my reply.
Indeed, it will be nice to have a note to introductions. This probably applies to many languages and I am sure every one of it handles it differently.
I had stepped back from this task as I had found other work, but now I'm trying to finish this. As I have no knowledge about martial arts, could you please tell me if "Strongman athlete" should be capitalised? Thanks!
No worries. Actually I was not really expecting you to do this.
Apparently I do not even know what a "Strongman athlete" is either. However [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?search=Strongman%20athlete&title=Special%3ASearch&fulltext=1&ns0=1&ns120=1 nobody writes "strongman athlete".
I'd seen that, too, but I'd also seen strongman (Q1852228), which did confuse me. I'll keep it as is then.
Ah, strongman (Q1852228) writes it with a lower-case letter. But I guess this case is a different issue.
oops. While the above is true, I meant to refer to Interrelationships between strength, anthropometrics, and strongman performance in novice strongman athletes. (Q39665891), as that uses the exact phrase we're talking about.
I guess you are better off asking a native English speaker here. English is rather confusing when it comes to capitalization, as bad as German, probably even more. :D
Huch?
I probably copied it over from somewhere and forgot to change it to German.
Done (German and English), see (with some unrelated changes on the go) for reference. I have also fixed some other issues with descriptions, like descriptions beginning with articles or ending with full stops, and descriptions created as sentences (and one or another typo/punctuation fix). See also Help:Description/de for German descriptions.
Thanks a ton. I will have a peep on the changes, also to see how they would like to do it. I disagree with some of the recommendations but it will be too exhausting not to adhere. Lucky us. :)
Yeah, I do think articles could be useful sometimes, but I guess leaving them out altogether is more consistent.
That's basically why I adhere. I am a fan of consistency even if it is ... ;)
Bitte weiterhin aufpassen.
Danke für den Hinweis. Ja, die lieben Beistrichregeln. :| Ansonsten bin ich der Herde hinterhergelaufen. :|
Die meinte ich gar nicht, es ging um die Kleinschreibung.
Dies hat mich indes mehr gewurmt. Aber ja, das meinte ich mit der Herde, da zu dem Zeitpunkt meiner Bearbeitung die englischsprachige Version ebenfalls nicht astrein war.
Nochmal, das ist nichts persönliches und es besteht auch für dich kein Grund, dass du persönlich oder beleidigend wirst. Das hätte auch anders geklärt werden können, und zwar administrativ mit Antrag auf Schreibsperre. Weder das eine, noch das andere muss sein. Gruß
Hallo Kghbln, bitte lass solche Änderungen bleiben. Bei Wikidata besteht ein großer Handlungsspielraum, der aber nicht für persönliche Vorlieben ausgenutzt werden sollte. Die Labels für Film-ID und Personen-ID werden überall verwendet (z.B. ČSFD film ID (P2529) / Kinopoisk person ID (P2604) und Kinopoisk film ID (P2603) usw. usw.). Es gibt sicher andere Möglichkeiten, wie du dich hier nützlich einbringen kannst.
Alles klar. Bitte sorge indes dafür, daß Du fehlerfreie Bezeichnungen verwendest. Solange dies nicht der Fall ist, werde ich die Fehler korrigieren und die entsprechenden Bearbeitungen rückgenängig machen und bessere Bezeichnungen einsetzen. Besten Dank für Dein Verständnis.
Der fehlende Bindestrich ist kein Fehler sondern normales labeling.
Achte bitte darauf das normale "labeling" auf Deutsch durchzuführen, zumindest wenn Du Bearbeitungen für de durchführst. Besten Dank.
Achte bitte du darauf, dass der allgemeine Konsens zählt. Mach kein Stress und bleib cool. Das ist nichts gegen dich. Renn nicht mit dem Kopf an die Wand und versuch nicht jetzt besondere (deine) Sichtweisen in diesem Fall einzuführen.
Ich gebe nach. Bevor bei Euch Film- und Fernsehleuten Pipi im Höschen ist, verwenden wir hier doch lieber die Version mit Rechtschreibfehler. Die ist ja offensichtlich Konsens. Letztlich wird über Euch gelacht.
What's the difference between these two? Is there any benefit to using Semantic Wikimedia over Wikibase? Can the two be somehow merged?
Actually it is called Semantic MediaWiki and it is the "older sister" of Wikibase. I personally see SMW as a software for storing and visualizing structured data within a wiki whereas WB is a software for storing structured data (in masses).
On mw.o some people are currently shaping a page comparing the both.
These two will not be merged but I believe that it is about time to think about how to bridge the two. As a matter of fact this has already started.
This post was hidden by Kghbln (history)
There are no older topics